John Taylor is a vice-chair at the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal with 86 decisions on record from 1997 to 2011. Key areas include administrative law, other tribunals, environmental law.

What tribunal does John Taylor sit on?

John Taylor sits on the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does John Taylor decide?

John Taylor's most common areas include Administrative Law (83 decisions), Other Tribunals (78 decisions), Environmental Law (32 decisions). John Taylor has handled 86 decisions across 4 areas.

How many decisions has John Taylor made?

John Taylor has 86 decisions on record from 1997 to 2011.

Who frequently appears before John Taylor?

Representatives who frequently appear before John Taylor include Peter Wechselmann, Joanne Cook, Don Dowdell.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

John Taylor — Vice-Chair

John Taylor

Vice-Chair·Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal·Since 1997

cases · 15 yrs · OAFRAAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice Chair· 32Vice-Chair· 30Vice Chair· 14vice-président· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1Vice Chair· 1Vice Chair· 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 27, 2001

Appeal regarding municipal drain construction allowed in part to remediate improper spoil disposal.

The appellant appealed the quality of construction of a municipal drain under section 64 of the Drainage Act.

The appellant raised concerns regarding a gabion structure placed on its property, potential liability, and the improper disposal of excavated spoil which created a berm and caused ponding.

The Tribunal found the gabion structure was constructed adequately and in accordance with the engineer's report, and declined to order fencing at the drain's expense.

However, the Tribunal found the spoil was not adequately spread and ordered the engineer to consult with the landowner to level the material and construct swales to prevent ponding.

Woodville Drain #1 (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 19

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 23, 2001

Tribunal denies discovery of municipal engineer but orders limited document production and grants adjournment.

The appellant brought a preliminary motion seeking an adjournment, an examination for discovery of the municipal engineer, and the right for their own engineer to inspect the land.

The Tribunal denied the request for an examination for discovery, noting such orders are only for extraordinary circumstances.

However, the Tribunal granted the adjournment and ordered the municipal engineer to produce specific documents, including field notes and calculations, to ensure fairness without overcomplicating the quasi-judicial process.

Carl King v. City of Kawartha Lakes, 2001 ONAFRAAT 18

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 21, 2001

Tribunal permits witness testimony by videoconference and orders mutual disclosure of witness names and test results.

In a preliminary decision regarding an appeal of somatic cell count test results under the Ontario Raw Milk Quality Program, the appellants requested permission to have witnesses testify via videoconference.

The respondent objected and requested disclosure of witness names.

The appellants also sought disclosure of individual laboratory test results rather than summaries.

The Tribunal granted the request for videoconferencing at the appellants' expense, ordered both parties to disclose anticipated witness names, and directed the respondent to endeavor to produce the requested individual test results.

Lafrance v. Director of Regulatory Compliance, Ontario Raw Milk Quality Program, 2001 ONAFRAAT 17

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 20, 2001

Crop insurance appeal partially granted; yield loss attributed equally to drought and poor farm management.

The appellant appealed AGRICORP's decision to deny his crop insurance claim for a reduced soybean yield in 1999.

AGRICORP had denied the claim on the basis that the yield reduction was due to poor farm management practices, specifically inadequate weed control, rather than an insured peril like drought.

The Tribunal found that the yield reduction was caused by a combination of drought (an insured peril) and poor farm management practices (late planting and lack of crop rotation).

The Tribunal ordered AGRICORP to pay 50% of the claim, amounting to $2,109.97.

Pillon et al. v Agricorp, 2001 ONAFRAAT 10

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 19, 2001

Drainage assessment appeal granted; original engineer's report reinstated after Court of Revision's inequitable alterations.

The appellants appealed their assessment under the Drainage Act regarding the Dippel Drainage Works.

The Court of Revision had previously altered the engineer's original assessment schedule by shifting statutory benefits for culverts from downstream landowners to the appellants.

The Tribunal found no basis in the Drainage Act for the Court of Revision's changes and noted that the revised maintenance schedule inequitably burdened the appellants.

The Tribunal granted the appeal, set aside the Court of Revision's decision, and reinstated the original engineer's report.

Orland and Freida Dippel v. Township of West Grey, 2001 ONAFRAAT 9

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 31, 2001

Appeals regarding municipal drain construction and outlet location dismissed; assessments adjusted.

Three landowners appealed the engineer's report and the Court of Revision's decision regarding the proposed Cook-Leddy Municipal Drain.

The appellants raised concerns about the necessity of the drain, the location of the outlet, potential pollution of a farm pond, and the apportionment of assessments.

The Tribunal found that the drain was necessary to address excess water and provide a legal outlet.

It declined to relocate the outlet downstream of the pond due to the substantial additional costs that would result.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals regarding the drain's construction and outlet location, but set aside the Court of Revision's decision and adjusted the assessments for two of the properties.

Cook-Leddy Municipal Drain (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 6

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 15, 2000

Tribunal adjusts municipal drain assessments to account for different run-off rates but declines to modify works.

Several landowners appealed the assessments and the engineer's report regarding the Bourdeau Municipal Drain.

The appellants argued that the municipality should bear the costs of drain modifications and repairs, and disputed their individual assessments based on the extent to which their properties contributed to or benefited from the drain.

The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to modify the drainage works but ordered adjustments to the assessment schedule, including a minimum assessment per property and specific reductions for certain landowners, noting that the engineer failed to differentiate run-off rates between residential and undeveloped lands.

Bourdeau Municipal Drain (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 31

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 16, 2000

Drainage works approved but benefit assessments varied to remove unjustified special levy on nearby properties.

Property owners appealed an engineer's report and a Court of Revision decision concerning improvements to a municipal drain.

The municipality initiated the report to enclose a fragile section of the open drain and update assessment schedules.

Appellants challenged the necessity of the works and the engineer's apportionment of costs, specifically a $200 special benefit assessment levied on 38 nearby properties.

The Tribunal approved the proposed works, finding them necessary to prevent potential collapse and flooding.

However, the Tribunal found the $200 special levy unjustified, ordering its deletion and reallocating the costs by increasing the assessments on the four properties immediately abutting the works and adding a nominal levy to all parcels in the watershed.

Oil Mill Creek Municipal Drain (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 30

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 16, 2000

Drainage Act appeal dismissed; agricultural benefits of drain improvements found commensurate with costs.

Three landowners appealed an engineer's report recommending repair and improvement of the Florent-Chretien Drain, arguing the benefits were not commensurate with costs and raising environmental concerns about water quality and beaver dams.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding the agricultural benefits of the drainage works justified the costs and that the appellants' environmental concerns, while valid, were better addressed in other forums.

The Tribunal ordered minor modifications to the engineer's report to include natural sediment basins and clarify buffer strip widths.

Florent-Chretien Drain (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 17

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 2, 2000

Motion to dismiss crop insurance appeal granted as it was filed beyond the strict one-year statutory limitation period.

Agricorp brought a motion to dismiss an appeal by the insured regarding a 1993 corn crop insurance claim on the basis that the appeal was filed outside the statutory time limit.

The insured argued that they were misled by Agricorp into believing they had no contract of insurance, leading them to pursue a premium refund instead of appealing the denial of benefits.

The Tribunal found that the appeal was filed well beyond the one-year statutory time limit from the filing of the proof of loss, and that the Tribunal has no authority to extend this time limit.

The motion was granted and the appeal was dismissed.

757182 Ontario Limited v Agricorp, 2000 ONAFRAAT 15

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 19, 2000

Tribunal approved bylaw amendments to relocate a drain and assessed increased costs to Bell Canada.

The Township of Zorra applied to the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal to modify a bylaw regarding the Cartmale Drain.

During construction, a Bell Canada fibre optic cable was discovered, requiring the drain to be relocated.

The Tribunal approved the requested amendments to the bylaw, including assessing the increased costs of the relocation to Bell Canada.

Cartmale Drain (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 12

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 21, 2000

Drainage assessment report referred back to engineer for reconsideration due to errors and boundary issues.

The appellants appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the assessments for the repair of the Edgar Sideroad Drain.

The engineer had based the assessments on a 1979 report but later provided a revised schedule that changed almost every property's assessment.

The appellants and other assessed owners raised concerns about the calculation of cut-off benefits, watershed boundaries, and the distribution of costs.

The engineer acknowledged errors and requested the report be referred back.

The Tribunal ordered the report referred back to the engineer for reconsideration under section 51(1) of the Drainage Act, with specific recommendations for the revised report, and ordered that the engineering costs for the revision and hearing not be charged to the drainage project.

Joseph Malenfant and Stanley Hall v. Town of Essex (Edgar Sideroad Drain), 2000 ONAFRAAT 2

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 6, 2000

Tribunal modifies engineer's report for municipal drain to adjust alignment, land allowances, and road crossing costs.

Several landowners and municipalities appealed the engineer's report and Court of Revision decisions regarding the Séguin/East Boundary Municipal Drain.

The appellants challenged the assessments, the allowances for land taken and damages, and the proposed alignment of the drain.

The Tribunal dismissed the specific appeals but ordered modifications to the engineer's report, including relocating a portion of the drain, adjusting land allowances, and directing that the cost of the road crossing be charged to the road authority pursuant to section 26 of the Drainage Act.

Seguin/East Boundary Municipal Drain (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 15, 1999

Tribunal adopted Minutes of Settlement resolving an appeal of a drainage works engineer's report.

The appellant appealed an engineer's report regarding the 8th Concession East Drain under sections 48 and 54 of the Drainage Act.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement.

The Tribunal accepted the Minutes of Settlement, which amended the assessment schedule and relocated a borrow pit, and ordered the engineer and the municipality to modify the report, tender documents, and by-law accordingly.

Carl Hape v. Town of Essex, 1999 ONAFRAAT 33

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 15, 1999

Application to modify municipal by-law for relocation of municipal drain approved on terms.

The City of Port Colborne applied to the Tribunal requesting a modification to a municipal by-law concerning the relocation of a portion of the Wignell W2 Municipal Drain.

The proposed work, undertaken entirely at the cost of a local quarry, would relocate the drain to fit into the final quarry configuration and rehabilitation plan.

The Tribunal approved the requested amendments to the by-law on terms, directing the engineer to amend the report and the city clerk to replace the relevant drawings and notify affected persons.

Wignell W2 Municipal Drain (Re), 1999 ONAFRAAT 32

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 7, 1999

Appeals from engineer's report and Court of Revision dismissed; drainage works and assessments confirmed.

Several landowners appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Walker Drain, Branch 'B' in the Township of West Elgin.

The appellants argued that the anticipated benefits of the proposed drainage works were not commensurate with the estimated costs and challenged their respective assessments.

The Tribunal found that the project was necessary to address flooding issues and that the administrative costs, while high, were largely due to the ratepayers' own requests for meetings and revisions.

The Tribunal confirmed the engineer's assessments, finding them appropriate given the natural drainage patterns and the benefits provided by the new drain.

The appeals were dismissed.

Walker Drain, Branch “B” (Re), 1999 ONAFRAAT 26

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 16, 1999

Drain relocation upheld but engineer's report amended to increase allowances and Township's special benefit assessment.

The appellants appealed an engineer's report concerning the relocation and repair of the Harkness Drain, arguing that the allowances for damages and tree removal were insufficient and that the drain should not be moved off the road allowance.

The Tribunal upheld the decision to relocate the drain to accommodate road improvements but found that the Road Authority was not assessed enough for the benefit it received.

The Tribunal ordered the engineer's report to be amended to increase the special benefit assessment to the Township, increase the allowances for right-of-way and damages for the appellants, modify the piping requirements, and recalculate the allowances for tree removal.

Brian Stewart and William Miller v. Township of Moore, 1999 ONAFRAAT 25

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 30, 1999

Tribunal modified drainage assessments, finding upper owners liable for outlet but adjusting the benefit ratio.

The appellants appealed the decision of the Court of Revision confirming the engineer's report and assessments for the Stefanik Drain.

The appellants argued that they were riparian owners on a natural watercourse and therefore should not be assessed for outlet liability.

The Tribunal conducted a site view and concluded that the channel in question was not a natural watercourse with riparian rights, but rather a swale used as an outlet for tile drainage.

The Tribunal found that the proposed drain provided a legal outlet for the upper properties, justifying an outlet assessment.

However, the Tribunal adjusted the assessment ratio, determining that the main purpose of the work was to reclaim land on the lower property, and modified the schedule of assessment accordingly.

John Babensky, Raymond Poort and Raymond Packet v. Township of Enniskillen, 1999 ONAFRAAT 20

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 7, 1999

Campground owners' drainage benefit assessment reduced by $3,000 and redistributed across watershed.

The appellants, owners of a campground, appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding their assessment for improvements to the Ipperwash Drain.

They argued their benefit assessment was too high and disproportionate to the benefits received.

The Tribunal found the engineer's assessment method appropriate but concluded the specific benefit assessment against the appellants was too high.

The Tribunal ordered the appellants' benefit assessment reduced by $3,000, with that amount redistributed to the outlet assessment of all lands in the watershed.

Carolinian Forest Campground (Sandra Funk) v. Town of Bosanquet, 1999 ONAFRAAT 17

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 7, 1999

Drainage Act appeal dismissed; engineer's assessment schedule for drain maintenance upheld as fair.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the assessment schedule for future maintenance of a section of the O'Brien Drain under the Drainage Act.

The appellant argued that the drain should be treated as one continuous project and that all users should be assessed equally based on acreage.

The Tribunal found that the Drainage Act requires partitioning the drain for maintenance purposes so that landowners are not assessed for work done upstream of their outlet.

The Tribunal upheld the engineer's methodology, which adjusted the previous 1953 assessment to account for subsequent severances, road construction, and drainage diversions.

The appeal was dismissed, with minor amendments ordered to clarify the report's scope.

Norman DeMeyer v. Township of Plympton, 1999 ONAFRAAT 18

Page 3 of 5 (86 cases)

agent of appellant Patrick Shanahan

Paul ShanahanAgent
1 appearance
Leo ShanahanAgent
1 appearance

appellant

Joanne CookSelf-represented
2 appearances
Art DunlopSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bill MundaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian ShanahanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel BrunerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SelmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerry DeBruynSelf-represented
1 appearance
Grant BurksSelf-represented
1 appearance
Heinz ProbstSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jean-Paul CussonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim McLaughlinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim StephensonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joe MalenfantSelf-represented
1 appearance
John Van BommelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph StephensonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ken FoundSelf-represented
1 appearance
Larry McNeilSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lise BéliveauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Luc CussonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary StephensonSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant in person

Harold ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth L. PeerSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant, in person

Donald CarrollSelf-represented
1 appearance
George KlotzSelf-represented
1 appearance
John K. WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
L. George SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Liberato SaltarelliSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant, JEMA Foods

Jim DiMennaAgent
1 appearance

appellants

Audrey StinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HamiltonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald MathesonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Elaine KonecnySelf-represented
1 appearance
Evelyn ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gilbert DePorterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gordon StinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
James HamiltonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
John PaetzSelf-represented
1 appearance
Norm StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Pauline MathesonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Phyllis CoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert BourqueSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharon LiekninsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vickie StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance
William CoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
William MillerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner

Beverly BaxterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian DammSelf-represented
1 appearance
Craig ThompsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dale McFeetersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald BellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald GreenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Earle GraySelf-represented
1 appearance
Evelyn HamblySelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank DezsoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hank GorisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jackie ConnellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jack WilkinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joe Isley Jr.Self-represented
1 appearance
Joe MurphySelf-represented
1 appearance
John FarrowSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ken HamblySelf-represented
1 appearance
Ken LeddySelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth SteerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lyle SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowners

Barry HarwoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Claude BourqueSelf-represented
1 appearance
David LaurenceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eugene BarnesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne LeesonSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed owner

Armand BrunetSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bernice O’HearSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bon RicheterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bruce SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Commodore AllenSelf-represented
1 appearance
David FleckSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas SherkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ernie DerbyshireSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerry ShaubelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn PfistererSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BellonteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret BalgaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marjorie AlbeeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rick BradySelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert StrettonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandy BunkerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steve ChapoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tim BennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne DonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
William ParkerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed owner, in person

Brian SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
David DurhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
N. LittleSelf-represented
1 appearance
R. DoddsSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed ratepayer, party to the hearing

A. VanHarenSelf-represented
1 appearance
C. TeezelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ted ScottSelf-represented
1 appearance

assistant to Mr. Foran

Elizabeth PatrickCounsel
1 appearance

au nom de l’intimée, la municipalité

André DesjardinsAgent
1 appearance
Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance

counsel for the appellant

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the respondent

Tom GrahamCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to appellant

Noël BerthiaumeCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to JEMA Foods

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Joe Vink, appellant

John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Mr. Leddy

Mike MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant

Paul EnnsCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, 757182 Ontario Limited

Don GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Donald Bailey

George ReynoldsCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Georgian Bay Milk Company

James P. McIlroyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Mr. Derek Crolla

Thomas Allen RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant Mr. Kevin Donohue

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants

Pascale GiguèreCounsel
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants, Gilbert Goyer and Green Acres Tech

Stephanie BouchardCounsel
1 appearance
Rodrigue EscayolaCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Todd Suter

Mark MacKewCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Municipality of Leamington

Brian SweetCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent

Barry BresnerCounsel
1 appearance
Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, AGRICORP

Peter WechselmannCounsel
4 appearances
David VickersCounsel
1 appearance
Peter WechselmanCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey P. SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Colchester South

E. MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

Crop Insurance Commodity Specialist, AGRICORP

Husseinali ShivjiAgent
1 appearance

Deputy Director of Public Works

Nick AragonaAgent
1 appearance

drainage engineer who prepared report

Mike DeVosAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent

Henri BennemeerAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for the respondent the City of Port Colborne

René LandryAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for the respondent, the Township of Champlain

Michael St. JeanAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, Town of Minto

Chris PeterAgent
1 appearance

Engineer

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

engineer for the report

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the addendum to the report

Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the report

Gerard RoodAgent
1 appearance
Kent SchachowskojAgent
1 appearance
Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the report

Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the Report

Gaetan H. LascellesAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report, for the Municipality of Leamington

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for 3A and Associates Investments Limited

M. BergmanCounsel
1 appearance

for AGRICORP

Bill QuippAgent
1 appearance
Eric BrouwerAgent
1 appearance
Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance
John TimmermansAgent
1 appearance

for Glen Tulpin

Julien DeplanckeAgent
1 appearance

for Grand River Conservation Authority

Jennifer WrightAgent
1 appearance

for herself

Carmen GirouardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cindy SauveSelf-represented
1 appearance
Isabel MosselerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Katherine CavanaughSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mariette Gareau-FosterSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Allan SimpsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bob KordybanSelf-represented
1 appearance
David DawsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ed SeguinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerard VermeerenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gilles ChretienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guilio NacciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guy DurocherSelf-represented
1 appearance
H. Vern SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jean Jacques DemersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Louis DobrichSelf-represented
1 appearance
Luigi TroianiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Milton SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter HutchisonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ronald Van RaesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ron VanDenBrinkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stuart GomesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Terry BuysSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ulrich SchaererSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor ReasbeckSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Just Beginning Inc., assessed owner

Anton NoorloosAgent
1 appearance

for Keith MacLennan

Douglas HewsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Marilyn Nicholson

Paul NicholsonAgent
1 appearance

former Deputy Reeve

Lawrie WepplerSelf-represented
1 appearance

former Reeve of the municipality

Denis PommainvilleSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Michael Brausam, assessed landowner

Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Montreal Soaring Council, assessed landowner

Walter EkiertAgent
1 appearance

for Mrs. Olga Woods, assessed owner

Will BartlettAgent
1 appearance

for Ms. Cindy Sauve and assessed landowners

Andrew RobinsonAgent
1 appearance

for R. Christensen

Thomas ChristensenAgent
1 appearance

for Tampa Farms Ltd., K. Fowler, B.&M. Vandenberg, B. Vandenberg, H. Stoelinga, R.&L. Graham and J.&R. Graham

William TurvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant

David JohnstonAgent
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance
Emile DeschambaultSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance
Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance
Keith VanderbekeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul BeaudetCounsel
1 appearance
Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance
Sheldon PettleCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, International Dairy Direct

Donald R. GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant Milton Smith

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant Mr. Kevin Donohue

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Mr. Watson

Ron ReaumeCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Olszowka Poultry Inc.

John JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants

Fred FunkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary EmerickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Philip EmerickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra FunkSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Numerous appellantsSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellants, Heinz and Christine Probst

Thomas RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Fancsy

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants Mr. Packet, Mr. Poort and Mr. Babensky

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants Orland and Freida Dippel

Stephen DippelAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant the Renfrew County Roman Catholic Separate School Board

Don DowdellAgent
2 appearances

for the appellant V. DeJong

Klaus DeJongAgent
1 appearance

for the applicant (respondent in the appeal, the OPPMB)

Sean ForanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Armstrong appellants

Donald ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the assessed landowner

Lambertus (Bert) HuysSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the City of Port Colborne

Rene LandryAgent
1 appearance

for the City of St. Thomas

Burt LongAgent
1 appearance

for the DeJong Farm (Petrolia) Ltd., assessed owner

Everett DeJongAgent
1 appearance

for the Engineer

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

for the Grape Growers of Ontario

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the municipality

John D. ValleeAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality

Bruce CrozierAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Central Elgin

Donald LietchAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of West Nipissing

Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of West Perth

Jim DemerlingAgent
1 appearance
Ken ClarkeAgent
1 appearance
Patricia TaylorAgent
1 appearance

for the O'Neil appellants

Charles O'NeilSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the respondent

Fred ThompsonAgent
1 appearance
Harry FraserAgent
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance
Ron SwainCounsel
1 appearance
Rosaire St. PierreAgent
1 appearance
Wm. GrahamAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, AgriCorp

Tom GrahamCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey P. SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents to the motion (appellants in the appeal), Elite Swine and Cold Springs Farm Ltd.

Robert ShapiroCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of LaSalle

Ed LaFontaineAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

J. A. McBrideAgent
1 appearance
J. R. DicksonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Colchester South

E. MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Dawn-Euphemia

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance
Paul DaltonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Enniskillen

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Gosfield North

Terrence SimsCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Malahide

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Melancthon

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Osgoode

Kevin GraceAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Plympton

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of West Grey

William J. MannerowAgent
1 appearance

for the township

Mr. ViceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of South-West Oxford

Wray RamseyAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of West Elgin

John PooleAgent
1 appearance
John SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the Wine Council of Ontario

James McIlroyCounsel
1 appearance

for Westview Church

George BartlettAgent
1 appearance

for William Henderson

W. JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance

General Adjuster, AGRICORP

Jim KonecnyAgent
1 appearance

landowner

Donna MichlowskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Everett GrotenhuisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gordon SouthSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret WenzelSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of 104284 Canada Lteé, appellant

Wayne AssalyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of 483038 Ontario Inc., appellant

André DesjardinsAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Clarkview Farms Ltd., party to the hearing

Roger ClarkAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Jean-Paul Cusson, appellant

Jean DecoeurAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Marion Piggott, assessed landowner

Gary PiggottAgent
1 appearance
Mark RankinAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Maurice Cheveaux, assessed landowner

Andrew DegrootAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of PPM Systems Inc.

Cec KuleyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant, Mr. Carl Hape

Paul CoureyCounsel
2 appearances

on behalf of the appellant, Mr. DeBruyn

Enio SulloAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellants

Melodie FoersterAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Counties of Prescott and Russell, appellant

Marc ClermontAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the City of Port Colborne

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the City of Thorold

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich

Wybe CnossenAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Nation Municipality

Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance
Stéphane LeclercAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Bosanquet

P. K. MehargAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Essex

Don JoudreyAgent
1 appearance
Elvey MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Ahfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Bromley

David A. StewartAgent
2 appearances

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Champlain

Leo TremblayAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Respondent, the Township of Champlain

Leo TremblayAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Colchester South

Elvey MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Dawn-Euphemia

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the township of Moore

Bill VietchAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Moore

Peter MehargAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Orford

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of West Lincoln

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Zorra

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Essex

Nick PeraltaAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Hawkesbury, appellant

Martin BonhommeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township of Bosanquet

Jim MonteithAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township of Enniskillen

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

principal of Mancini Homes, the appellant

Angelo ManciniAgent
1 appearance

Quality Assurance Manager, AGRICORP

Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance

représentant l’appelant

Noël BerthiaumeAgent
1 appearance

représentant l’appelant, Place Riviera Place Inc.

Michael ChambersAgent
1 appearance

représentant l’intimé, le canton de Champlain

Robert TolhurstAgent
1 appearance

representative of Cuddy Farms, assessed landowner

John CameronAgent
1 appearance

representative of the Grey/Bruce farmers group

Alan SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Harriett EllicottSelf-represented
1 appearance

representing appellants Richard Gosselin and Garry Beach, and assessed landowner Sylvain Gauthier

Al FraserAgent
1 appearance

representing assessed landowner Anna Isley

John IsleyAgent
1 appearance

representing Royal Bourdeau and René Giroux, Jean-Claude Pavan, Ralph (Rapheal) Gour, Royal Bourdeau, René Giroux, appellants

Jean MartelCounsel
1 appearance

representing the Municipality

André DesjardinsAgent
1 appearance

representing the respondent, the City of Kawartha Lakes

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

representing the St. Michaels Parish Church

Sylvester PowerAgent
2 appearances

Senior Adjuster, AGRICORP

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance

Senior Commodity Specialist, AgriCorp

Peter IllncykyjAgent
1 appearance

senior commodity specialist for the respondent, AgriCorp

Peter IlnyckyjAgent
1 appearance

Senior Manager Claims, AGRICORP

Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance

witness

Ronald BaileyAgent
1 appearance

witness to the Tribunal

Tim BellonteSelf-represented
1 appearance

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

0.8

cases/mo

OAFRAAT86(100%)

Decision types

appeal

motion

Page 3 of 5 (86 cases)