Inge M. Stamp

Employer's application for review of Order to Pay dismissed after trust cheque bounced.

The employer applied for a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The Ministry of Labour advised the Board that the employer's cheque for the requisite trust payment was returned by the bank.

As section 68(7) requires the employer to pay the amount to the Director in trust to file an appeal, the application for review was dismissed.

Safety-Kleen Ltd. v. Sypes, 2000 CanLII 7364

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant requested to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

Drywall Acoustic Lathing and Insulation Local 675, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Steel Technologies Framing Inc., 2000 CanLII 7629

Inge M. Stamp

Application for review of an Order to Pay terminated due to applicant's failure to file required forms.

The applicant employer filed an application for review of an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act.

The Board advised the applicant that the application would not be processed until it was filed as required by the Rules of Procedure, and provided the correct form and a 10-day deadline.

The applicant failed to file the required application.

The Board deemed the application abandoned, terminated the proceeding, and directed the Director of Employment Standards to pay out the $926.06 held in trust to the responding party employee.

Bridal Factory Ltd. v. Ramsackal, 2000 CanLII 1537

Inge M. Stamp

Application for review of Order to Pay terminated following parties' Minutes of Settlement.

The employer applied for a review of an Order to Pay issued by an Employment Standards Officer.

The employer and the employee subsequently entered into Minutes of Settlement to resolve the matter.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the disbursement of the funds held in trust by the Director in accordance with the settlement and terminated the application.

Total Document Solutions Inc. v. Oliver Ben O’Connor, 2000 CanLII 3239

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

Consent order issued declaring the employer bound by the collective agreement and ordering payment of damages.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Prior to the scheduled hearing, the parties reached a settlement and requested the Board to issue a consent order.

The Board issued declarations that the responding party is bound by the collective agreement and violated several of its articles.

The Board also ordered the responding party to pay damages totaling $3,233.74 to the applicant, union dues, and pension plan, in accordance with the memorandum of agreement.

Construction Workers Local 6 affiliated with the Christian Labour Association of Canada v. Schaible Electric Ltd., 2000 CanLII 2245

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

Union permitted to add responding parties and granted production of documents in related employer application.

The applicant union sought to amend its related employer and sale of a business applications to add two new responding parties, and requested production of documents.

The responding parties objected to the broad pre-hearing production request.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the amendment to add the responding parties and directed the responding parties to produce relevant documents.

The Board also directed the parties to meet with a Labour Relations Officer to resolve any remaining production issues.

Carpenters and Allied Workers Local 27, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Bentall Properties Ltd., 2000 CanLII 6855

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

Default judgment granted ordering employer to post $5,000 bond for delinquent benefit contributions.

The applicant referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding party failed to post a bond for delinquent contributions as required by the collective agreement.

The responding party failed to file a response or notice of intent to defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted the facts in the application.

The Board declared a violation of the collective agreement, ordered the responding party to post a $5,000 bond, and awarded costs to the applicant.

Carpenters District Council of Ontario v. Formcrete Contracting Ltd., 2000 CanLII 8799

Bernard Fishbein

79 cases1982–2011

Inge M. Stamp

Board issues agreed procedural directions and notice requirements for a construction industry sector dispute.

The parties in a construction industry sector dispute met with a Labour Relations Officer and agreed on the form of notice and the list of entities to be served.

The Board issued a procedural decision directing the applicant to forward the agreed notice to the listed entities, setting out the process for interventions and scheduling the hearing for March 2001.

International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, Local 1590 v. Bradscot (MCL) Ltd., 2000 CanLII 3210

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

Board issues default declarations and cease and desist order for collective agreement violations.

The applicant referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.

The Board found that the responding party violated the provincial collective agreement by subcontracting work to non-union employers and directed it to cease and desist.

The matter was scheduled for a hearing to determine damages and costs.

Lake Ontario District Council United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Phoenix Restoration, 2000 CanLII 3038

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

Default judgment granted ordering employer to post $5,000 bond for late benefit contributions.

The applicant referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding party failed to post a $5,000 bond for late benefit contributions as required by the collective agreement.

The responding party failed to file a response.

The Board deemed the responding party to have accepted the facts, found a violation of the collective agreement, and ordered the responding party to post the bond and pay costs.

Carpenters District Council of Ontario v. The Cooler Guys Inc., 2000 CanLII 8380

Inge M. Stamp

Application for review terminated following parties' execution of Minutes of Settlement.

The applicant sought a review of a refusal to issue an order to pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement with the assistance of a Labour Relations Officer, resolving all issues in dispute.

The settlement included a payment of $250 to the applicant and an agreement regarding employment references.

The Board terminated the application in accordance with subsection 69.1(5) of the Act.

Bruce N. Coursolle v. Elgin and Wintergarden Theatre Centre and Ministry of Labour, 2000 CanLII 4406

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

Board orders delinquent employer to post $5,000 bond in default construction industry grievance proceeding.

The applicant referred a construction industry grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding party failed to post a $5,000 bond as required by the collective agreement for delinquent employers.

The responding party failed to file a response or a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the Board deemed the facts in the application to be true, found the responding party in violation of the collective agreement, and ordered it to post the bond and pay costs.

Carpenters District Council of Ontario v. Long Valley Construction Limited, 2000 CanLII 9652

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

Applicant directed to provide valid addresses for service for responding parties whose mail was returned.

In an application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board, notices of the hearing date were sent to all responding parties.

Mail was returned from four responding parties.

The Board directed the applicant to forthwith provide the Registrar with valid addresses for service for each of these parties.

Brick and Allied Craft Union of Canada v. International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers, Local 6, 2000 CanLII 10655

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

Grievance allowed on default; delinquent employer ordered to post $5,000 bond for late benefit contributions.

The applicant referred a construction industry grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging the responding party failed to post a bond after being deemed a delinquent employer for late payment of contributions.

The responding party failed to file a response or notice of intent to defend.

Proceeding by way of default, the Board accepted the applicant's allegations of fact as true.

The Board declared that the responding party violated the provincial collective agreement and directed it to deliver a $5,000 bond to the trustees and pay costs of $664.

Carpenters District Council of Ontario v. City Accoustics Limited, 2000 CanLII 9494

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

Grievance allowed in default proceeding after employer failed to respond to section 133 referral.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding party employer failed to pay proper wages, overtime, and benefits.

The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.

The Board declared the responding party bound by the collective agreement, found it had violated the agreement, issued a cease and desist order, and directed the production of documents and payment of the filing fee.

Universal Workers Union, Labourers’ International Union of North America Local 183 v. Plastina Investments Limited, 2000 CanLII 6947

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMemeny

OLRB0 cases1996–2000

Employer found in violation of collective agreement in default decision after failing to respond to grievance.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act.

The responding employer failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.

The Board found that the employer violated the collective agreement by failing to employ union members at two jobsites, issued a cease and desist order, and directed the production of documents and payment of filing fees.

Universal Workers Union, Labourers’ International Union of North America Local 183 v. 1196683 Ontario Ltd. o/a Raicon Forming, 2000 CanLII 10643

Inge M. Stamp

Application for review of Order to Pay terminated following Minutes of Settlement.

The employer applied for a review of an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act.

The employer and the employee entered into Minutes of Settlement agreeing to the disbursement of funds held in trust by the Director.

The Board ordered the funds disbursed in accordance with the settlement and terminated the application.

Willows Agriservices v. David Scouten and Ministry of Labour, 2000 CanLII 1518

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardOct 12, 2000

Applications withdrawn with leave of the Board following agreement of the parties.

The parties reached an agreement and requested that the applications be withdrawn.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the applications.

Millwrights Union, Local 1007 v. Shelby Sheet Metal and Mechanical, 2000 CanLII 2850

J. G. Knight

Inge M. Stamp

G. McMenemy

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardOct 11, 2000

Board approves notice to contractors and waives Schedule 'F' requirement in accreditation applications.

The applicants sought accreditation as Employers' Organizations for the residential construction sector.

The Board approved the agreed-upon form of notice to be published in trade publications to notify affected contractors.

The Board also waived the requirement to compile Schedule 'F' (listing employers with no employees performing bargaining unit work in the past year) and scheduled the matters for a hearing.

Toronto Residential Construction Labour Bureau v. Universal Workers Union, Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 183, 2000 CanLII 6441

Russel Zinn

7 cases1989–2001

Ron Coppens

Robert Desjardins

2 cases2000–2001

J. Crausen

Garry Parsons

Elizabeth Mitchell

39 cases1988–2007

Darren Power

Inge M. Stamp