H. Peacock

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Certificate issued to applicant union following successful representation vote; intervenor's postponement request denied.

The applicant union applied for certification and won a representation vote among the employees of the responding party.

The intervenor union requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement request, consistent with its previous decisions, and issued a certificate to the applicant union.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Cruikshank Cleaning Contractors Ltd., 2000 CanLII 11275

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Union certification granted after successful representation vote; intervenor's request to postpone disposition denied.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The intervenor union requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement, noting it had dealt with these requests in other decisions.

Having found the bargaining unit appropriate and noting that more than 50% of the ballots in the representation vote were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Society of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, 2000 CanLII 11276

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Union certification granted following a successful representation vote, despite intervenor's request for postponement.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of employees at the responding party's centre.

The intervenor union requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion and raiding charges, which the Board denied, consistent with its other decisions.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board granted the certification and ordered a certificate to issue.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Merrymount Children’s Centre, 2000 CanLII 11279

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Union certified after winning representation vote; intervenor's requests to dismiss or postpone application rejected.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party nursing home.

The intervenor union requested that the application be dismissed for alleged non-compliance with the Board's Rules of Procedure, or postponed pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board rejected these requests, noting a lack of particulars for dismissal and relying on prior Board decisions regarding postponement.

As more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast in the representation vote were in favour of the applicant, the Board certified the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon unit of employees.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Babcock Nursing and Rest Homes Ltd., 2000 CanLII 11291

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Union certification granted following successful representation vote; intervenor's request to postpone disposition denied.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The intervenor requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement request, noting it had dealt with similar requests in other decisions.

Based on the representation vote where more than fifty percent of ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. The Corporation of the County of Lambton Marshall Gowland Manor, 2000 CanLII 12396

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Union certified as bargaining agent after winning representation vote; intervenor's objections dismissed.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The intervenor requested the application be dismissed for non-compliance with the Board's Rules of Procedure, or postponed pending a related contempt motion and raiding charges.

The Board rejected these requests, finding no particulars to decline giving effect to the representation vote.

As more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board certified the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon unit of therapy staff at the responding party's treatment centre.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers’ Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. George Jeffrey Children’s Treatment Centre, 2000 CanLII 12760

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Union certification granted; intervenor's request to dismiss application under section 8.1 denied.

The applicant union sought certification for a bargaining unit of nurses.

The intervenor requested that the application be dismissed under section 8.1 of the Act and that the disposition be postponed pending a contempt motion and raiding charges.

The Board dismissed the intervenor's requests, noting that section 8.1 is only available to employers, not trade unions.

Having regard to the representation vote where more than fifty percent of ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board granted certification.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers’ Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Victorian Order of Nurses Thunder Bay & District Branch, 2000 CanLII 13115

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Certification granted to applicant union following successful representation vote; intervenor's request for postponement denied.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The intervenor requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and the resolution of raiding charges by the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement, noting it agreed with other Board decisions dealing with these requests.

As more than fifty percent of the ballots cast in the representation vote were in favour of the applicant, the Board granted certification and ordered a certificate to issue.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. The Corporation of the County of Lambton Marshall Gowland Manor, 2000 CanLII 13144

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Board denies intervenor's postponement request and issues certification to the applicant union following a successful representation vote.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The intervenor union requested a postponement of the disposition based on a pending contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement request, noting it had dealt with and agreed with other Board decisions on this issue.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties on the bargaining unit description, and the representation vote where more than fifty percent of ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Sunbeam Residential Development Centre, 2000 CanLII 9263

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Representation vote directed for proposed bargaining unit of nursing staff.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of nursing staff employed by the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that the proposed bargaining unit is appropriate.

Based on the membership evidence, the Board directed that a representation vote be held.

The responding party's section 8.1 notice was not numerically relevant, so the ballot box will not be sealed.

Ontario Public Service Employees Union v. Multi-Professional Support Services Inc., 2000 CanLII 9070

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Application adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.

The Ontario Nurses' Association applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

On consent of the parties, the Board adjourned the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.

Ontario Nurses’ Association v. Don Mills Foundation, 2000 CanLII 7372

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Union certification granted after representation vote; requests to postpone disposition denied.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The responding party and intervenor requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement, noting it had dealt with these requests in other decisions.

Having found the bargaining unit appropriate and that more than 50% of the ballots in the representation vote were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Victoria Place Retirement Place, 2000 CanLII 6663

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Board directs representation vote for proposed bargaining unit of employees.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least 40% of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

United Steelworkers of America v. Nextrom Ltd., 2000 CanLII 3010

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Union certification granted following a successful representation vote with no objections filed.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate.

The Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant and cancelled previously set meeting and hearing dates.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Viceroy Homes Limited, 2000 CanLII 2471

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant, Canadian Union of Public Employees, sought to withdraw its application against Barton Place Nursing Home.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Barton Place Nursing Home, 2000 CanLII 5423

Patrick Kelly

OLRB0 cases1999–2019

J. A. Rundle

OLRB0 cases1986–2001

H. Peacock

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 11, 2000

Applications withdrawn at the request of the applicant union.

The applicant union requested to withdraw its applications.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the matters were withdrawn.

United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 175 v. Alamo Rent-A-Car (Canada) Inc., 2000 CanLII 6672

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Rundle

OLRB0 cases1986–2001

H. Peacock

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 11, 2000

Representation vote directed in application for certification.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties on the appropriate bargaining unit and finding that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed unit were members of the union, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Lift-Rite Inc., 2000 CanLII 8931

Russell Goodfellow

J. A. Rundle

OLRB0 cases1986–2001

H. Peacock

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 11, 2000

Board dismissed applicants' correspondence raising issues outside the scope of an already granted termination application.

The applicants submitted correspondence to the Board regarding a termination application.

The Board agreed with the responding party's counsel that the matters raised did not fall within the scope of the termination application, which had already been granted.

The Board also noted that the responding party's legal submissions appeared correct.

Herzenberg v. Power Workers’ Union CUPE Local 1000, 2000 CanLII 12166

M. A. Nairn

OLRB0 cases1989–2001

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock