M. A. Nairn

The applicant union and responding employers agreed to adjourn the application.

The Board adjourned the matter for 53 weeks, noting that it would be dismissed if no party requested to proceed within that time.

The parties agreed to adjourn the applications sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment, noting that the matters would be deemed terminated if no request to proceed was made within that time.

The parties agreed to adjourn the applications sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment, noting that if no party requests to proceed within that time, the matters will be deemed terminated without further notice.

The applicant brought a matter before the Ontario Labour Relations Board regarding an Employment Practices Branch file.

The Labour Relations Officer reported that the Ministry of Labour considered the matter closed following a settlement between the parties.

The Board terminated the proceeding.

The applicant filed an application for review of an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act.

Prior to the hearing, the applicant requested an adjournment by letter but failed to obtain consent from the other parties or request a telephone conference.

On the scheduled hearing date, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant.

The Board noted that the applicant had ample opportunity to retain counsel and could have sought production of documents if needed.

Due to the applicant's failure to appear, the application for review was dismissed.

The applicant sought to challenge an Employment Standards Officer's refusal to issue an Order.

The application for review was filed over five months past the 45-day statutory deadline.

The applicant requested an extension of time based on personal reasons.

The Board found that the reasons provided did not constitute reasonable grounds to extend the time limit given the significant delay.

The application was dismissed as untimely.

The applicant brought an application under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act to challenge an Order to Pay.

The Board noted ambiguity regarding whether the applicant was appealing a 1999 Order, a 2001 Order, or both, which affected the timeliness analysis.

The Board directed the applicant to provide written representations clarifying the precise nature of the appeal and addressing the timeliness issues.

The applicant sought to challenge an Employment Standards Officer's refusal to make an Order under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The application was filed on March 14, 2001, two days after the 45-day statutory deadline expired.

The Board requested representations regarding the untimeliness, but the applicant failed to respond or request an extension.

The application was dismissed as untimely.

The applicant applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees in the specified bargaining unit.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding employer failed to make required remittances to welfare and pension trust funds.

The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.

The Board found the employer violated the collective agreement and ordered it to pay $46,969.79 in damages and $214.00 in costs.

The applicant filed an application involving IEEW Local 353.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the parties to contact the Vote Co-ordinator to arrange a Post-Vote Meeting.

Following that meeting, the Board will determine whether it is appropriate to list the matter for a hearing.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent carpenters and carpenters' apprentices employed by the responding party in residential construction.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate and ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

Any bargaining rights held by the intervenor for this unit were terminated.

The Labourers' International Union of North America filed an application for certification.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the parties to contact the Vote Co-ordinator to arrange a Regional Certification Meeting.

Following that meeting, the Board will determine whether it is appropriate to list the matter for a hearing.

The applicant union filed applications against the responding party employer.

Following correspondence between counsel indicating that the responding party had received all of the applicant's submissions, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the responding party an extension of time to file its response.

The applicant sought to challenge an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act but filed its application for review past the 45-day statutory deadline.

The applicant requested an extension of time, explaining that the employee responsible for the appeal had unexpectedly quit.

The Board found appropriate grounds to grant the extension, deemed the application timely, and referred it to the Registrar for processing.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend/Participate.

Despite the responding party's failure to comply with the filing requirements, the Board declined to determine the referral solely on the material filed and directed that the scheduled hearing proceed to deal with all issues in dispute.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the parties in a union certification application to contact the Vote Co-ordinator to arrange a Regional Certification Meeting.

The Board will determine whether to list the matter for a hearing following that meeting.

The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement.

The Board issued a consent order declaring that the responding party was bound by the Carpenters Provincial Collective Agreement, had violated area work practices, and ordered the payment of $1,500 in damages as full and final settlement.

The applicant filed an application for review of an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act.

The application appeared to be filed past the 45-day statutory deadline.

However, the Ministry of Labour confirmed that the application and trust monies were received at a regional office before the deadline but were delayed in being forwarded to the Board.

The Board extended the time for filing, rendering the application timely, and referred it to the Registrar for processing.

The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging the responding party violated the collective agreement by subcontracting concrete forming work.

Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement.

The Board issued a consent order declaring the responding party bound by the collective agreement, finding a violation of the subcontracting provisions, and ordering the payment of $14,000 in damages.