Union's request for reconsideration dismissed as untimely and for failing to establish valid grounds.
The applicant union requested reconsideration of a Board decision regarding a bad faith bargaining complaint.
The Board dismissed the request, finding it was filed beyond the 20-day time limit under Rule 96 without explanation.
The Board further noted that even if timely, the request would be dismissed because it merely reargued the case and disputed findings of fact based on documents the parties themselves had put before the Board, failing to meet the stringent grounds required for reconsideration.
Applications deemed abandoned after applicants failed to respond to Board directions.
The applicants failed to respond to a previous Board direction requiring them to indicate whether they wished to continue with the litigation.
After attempting to contact counsel for Trentfab Inc. without success, the Adjudicator deemed the applications abandoned.
The Director of Employment Standards was directed to release the monies held in trust, along with accrued interest, to the employee responding party.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicants sought to withdraw their application against IBEW Local 586 and MegaTech Electrical.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Motion to suspend inspector's order pending appeal dismissed as union failed to show compelling grounds.
The applicant union sought to suspend an inspector's order pending an appeal under section 61(7) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
A worker had refused work citing the risk of physical assault from vehicle operators.
The inspector found that the complaint did not fall within the criteria for a work refusal under section 43(3) of the Act, but treated the concerns as a health and safety complaint and issued orders requiring corrective action.
The Board dismissed the suspension request, finding no compelling grounds to suspend the order, as the order did not limit the workers' right to refuse unsafe work and the employer was already complying with the corrective orders.
Employment standards application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant, Rashid Ahmed, sought to withdraw his employment standards application against Fat Albert's and the Ministry of Labour.
Adjournment of director's appeal granted in advance to spare employee respondents unnecessary travel.
The applicant, a corporate director, requested an adjournment of a scheduled hearing for an appeal under the Employment Standards Act.
Although the Ministry of Labour consented, the applicant failed to obtain consent from the numerous employee responding parties.
To spare the employees the inconvenience of traveling to Toronto only to have the adjournment granted, the Board granted the request in advance but warned the applicant that no further adjournments would be granted absent exceptional circumstances.
Consent order issued for $6,500 in damages for collective agreement violations following minutes of settlement.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.
The Board issued a consent order declaring the responding party bound to the Provincial Collective Agreement and finding violations of Articles 4 and 5.
The responding party was ordered to pay $6,500 in damages as full and final settlement.
Default judgment granted against employer for violating collective agreement by failing to use union members.
The responding parties failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.
Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding parties were deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.
The Board found that the responding parties were bound by the collective agreement and violated it by failing to utilize union members for work at a Barrie condominium project.
The Board ordered the responding parties to pay $55,323.84 in damages and $214.00 for the applicant's filing fees.
Time for filing request for review extended where delay was caused by Ministry forwarding application.
The applicant employer sought a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The application was received by the Board after the 45-day statutory deadline.
However, the Board found that the applicant had sent the application and the requisite payment in trust to the Ministry of Labour well within the time limit, and the delay was caused by the Ministry forwarding it to the Board.
The Board exercised its discretion under section 68(4) of the Act to extend the time for filing the application.
Appeal will be deemed terminated for abandonment unless applicant provides reasons to continue within 10 days.
The applicant filed an appeal but failed to make submissions as directed by the Board.
The Board directed the applicant to advise within 10 days why the application should continue to be processed, failing which the application will be deemed terminated for abandonment.
Union certification application dismissed after failing to secure majority support in representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification.
Following a representation vote where not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and no statements of desire to make representations were filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.
A one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for this bargaining unit was imposed.
Board directs representation vote in construction industry union certification application.
The applicant union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The responding party objected to the inclusion of Board Area 4 in the bargaining unit description, which the Board accepted.
Finding that the union appeared to have the requisite 40 percent membership support, the Board defined the appropriate bargaining unit and directed that a representation vote be held.
Representation vote directed in certification application after employer failed to file a response.
The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.
The responding party employer failed to file a response within the stipulated time.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that it appeared to have the requisite membership support of not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with voters asked to choose between the applicant and the incumbent union, the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 3054.
Employer ordered to pay $5,412.28 in unpaid benefit contributions following failure to respond to grievance referral.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging the responding employer failed to remit benefit trust fund contributions.
The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.
Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.
The Board found the employer violated the collective agreement and ordered it to pay $5,412.28 in outstanding contributions, late charges, and penalties, plus $214.00 in filing fees.
Appeal of Order to Pay terminated for failure to file required application forms.
The applicant sought to appeal an Order to Pay but failed to file the formal application on the proper forms as required by the Board's Rules of Procedure.
Despite being sent the required forms and given a 10-day deadline, the applicant did not file the application.
The Board terminated the matter.
Time for filing request for review of Order to Pay extended due to short delay.
The applicant employer requested a review of an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act.
The application was filed three days after the 45-day statutory deadline.
The Board exercised its discretion under section 68(4) of the Act to extend the time for filing, noting the short delay and that the requisite monies had been paid into trust.
Board confirms trade union status of applicant following name change and issues certification.
The applicant union applied for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
A representation vote was held, but the Board required the applicant to establish its trade union status due to a recent name change and affiliation change.
The Board found that the applicant was the same organization as its predecessor, having simply changed its name with the authorization of the General President.
The Board confirmed the applicant's trade union status, noted that the representation vote was successful, and ordered that a certificate issue.
Union application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Representation vote directed in construction industry certification application, with ballot box sealed pending status dispute.
The applicant trade union council applied for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The responding party claimed it had no employees in the proposed bargaining unit.
The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support and directed a representation vote for the proposed bargaining unit of electricians and apprentices, with the ballot box to be sealed pending resolution of the employee status dispute.
The applicant sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.