Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 30, 2011

Individual respondents ordered to file responses and submissions regarding applicant's request to withdraw.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal.

The organizational respondent filed a response identifying two individual respondents.

The applicant subsequently requested to withdraw the application against the organizational respondent only.

The individual respondents failed to file full responses as required.

The Tribunal ordered the individual respondents to file full responses and ordered all respondents to file written submissions regarding the applicant's request to withdraw.

Michelin v. Nishnawbe Gamik Friendship Centre, 2011 HRTO 1623

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 30, 2011

Respondent given 10 days to file a Response to human rights application after missing initial deadline.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the deadline set in the Notice of Application.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondent to file a Response within 10 days, along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice and deem the respondent to have accepted the allegations.

Khan v. Seneca College of Applied Arts and Technology, 2011 HRTO 1619

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 26, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent grievance arbitration process.

The applicant filed a human rights application regarding workplace accommodation.

The respondent and intervenor union submitted that the applicant's accommodation grievance remained outstanding and should proceed to arbitration.

The Tribunal deferred the application pending the conclusion of the grievance and arbitration process, noting the significant overlap in facts and issues and the risk of inconsistent findings.

Tuomela v. Sault Area Hospital, 2011 HRTO 1601

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 25, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of related WSIB appeal.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability with respect to services provided during a labour market re-entry (LMR) program.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the applicant had an ongoing WSIB appeal dealing with the same subject matter.

Both the applicant and the respondent WSIB agreed that the application should be deferred to avoid duplicative proceedings.

The Tribunal ordered the application deferred pending the conclusion of the WSIB appeal.

Halder v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2011 HRTO 1591

Andrew Drury

2 cases2011–2015

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 24, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend scheduled conference call hearing.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in housing based on disability and receipt of public assistance.

A conference call hearing was scheduled to hear the respondent's request to dismiss the application under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to attend or participate in the scheduled conference call hearing.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Hardman v. Grey County Housing, 2011 HRTO 1587

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 24, 2011

Extension of time granted to respond to interim remedy request; submissions ordered on delay and deferral.

The applicant, a teacher, filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisal, along with a request for an interim remedy regarding a change in her work assignment.

The respondent requested an extension of time to respond to the interim remedy request due to the school principal's absence during the summer closure.

The Tribunal granted the extension, finding the respondent had valid reasons.

Additionally, noting that the application raised events older than one year and that the applicant had outstanding grievances, the Tribunal ordered the parties to provide written submissions on whether the older allegations are time-barred under section 34 of the Code and whether the application should be deferred pending the grievance process.

Bruno v. Toronto Catholic District School Board, 2011 HRTO 1580

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 18, 2011

Human rights application deemed abandoned after applicant failed to provide alternate hearing dates.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code but subsequently moved out of Ontario and joined the military.

She advised the Tribunal she could not attend the scheduled hearing in person and requested to proceed in writing.

The Tribunal previously ruled an in-person hearing was required to assess credibility and directed her to provide alternate dates.

After failing to provide alternate dates despite extensions, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Ketchum v. Serco DES Inc., 2011 HRTO 1545

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 16, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of the applicant's related WSIB appeal.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, claiming he was dismissed for abandoning his employment after his driver's license was revoked due to a previous workplace injury.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred because the applicant was appealing a WSIB decision dealing with the same facts and circumstances.

The Tribunal found that the WSIB appeal dealt with similar allegations and issues, including the reasons for dismissal and entitlement to loss of earnings compensation.

To avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions, the Tribunal deferred the application pending the conclusion of the WSIB appeal.

McIntosh v. Shred-It, 2011 HRTO 1527

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 15, 2011

Tribunal removes five personal respondents from human rights application for lacking specific allegations of discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination based on disability against his employer and several personal respondents.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss regarding five personal respondents because the application failed to identify specific acts of discrimination committed by them.

After receiving submissions, the Tribunal removed the five individuals as respondents, noting that corporate respondents are vicariously liable for employees' actions and personal respondents should not be named unnecessarily.

Tom Argiropoulos v. University of Toronto, 2011 HRTO 1507

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 15, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending outcome of related WSIB appeal to avoid inconsistent decisions.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability.

The applicant requested that the application be deferred pending the outcome of an appeal regarding his Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) claim for loss of earnings benefits.

The Tribunal granted the deferral, noting that proceeding concurrently could lead to inconsistent decisions and that the WSIB appeal outcome would be relevant to whether the application should be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

Vinayagamorthy Arumugam v. Venture Industrial Supplies Inc., 2011 HRTO 1515

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 11, 2011

Tribunal deferred dismissing late human rights application to allow respondent to make submissions on prejudice.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of race and disability, approximately three years after the last alleged incident.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss due to the delay.

The applicant submitted that the delay was caused by his mental health condition and ongoing negotiations with the employer.

The Tribunal found that it could not determine the issue of delay at the preliminary stage without submissions from the respondent regarding substantial prejudice.

The Tribunal ordered the application to be delivered to the respondent for submissions on the delay issue.

Nelson Pelletier v. Nortrax Canada Inc., 2011 HRTO 1495

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 9, 2011

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction due to concurrent civil action on identical facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and wrongful dismissal based on disability.

She had previously commenced a civil action against the respondent relying on identical facts and seeking similar remedies.

The Tribunal found that section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code barred the application because of the concurrent civil proceeding.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Gordon v. Whitby Oshawa Imports, 2011 HRTO 1474

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 8, 2011

Adjournment request denied because the respondent union failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The respondent union requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing dates, citing a scheduling conflict.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting that the union failed to provide exceptional circumstances as required by the Tribunal's Practice Direction, and the request was made outside the permitted timeline.

Pazhaidam v. North York General Hospital, 2011 HRTO 1485

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 8, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent grievance arbitration on the same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of disability, claiming the respondent employer failed to provide suitable modified work and the respondent union failed to facilitate accommodation.

The respondents requested that the application be deferred because the applicant had concurrent workplace grievances scheduled for arbitration regarding the same events.

The Tribunal granted the request and deferred the application, finding substantial overlap between the facts and issues in the application and the grievances, and noting the risk of inconsistent findings if both proceedings ran concurrently.

Lourenco v. Hamilton Health Sciences, 2011 HRTO 1483

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 8, 2011

Respondent given 10 days to file a Response to human rights application before Tribunal proceeds without them.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to participate and granting them 10 days to file a Response with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice.

Jennifer Dunk v. Dollar Haven and Discount Store, 2011 HRTO 1481

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 8, 2011

Applicant's unopposed request to remove personal respondents and amend application granted.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to remove five personal respondents, delete a paragraph from his narrative, and amend his Application to clarify monetary relief.

The respondents did not file submissions in response.

The Tribunal granted the request, noting that the applicant sought to narrow the allegations and the respondents did not object.

Edgar Guzman v. Senton Incorporated and John Thain, 2011 HRTO 1480

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 4, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal communications.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After initially requesting to postpone mediation, the applicant failed to respond to multiple subsequent communications from the Tribunal regarding rescheduling.

The Tribunal warned the applicant that failure to respond would result in the application being deemed abandoned pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

As the applicant did not respond within the specified timeline, the application was deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Beverly Landen-Zynoberg v. Enhanced Hearing Corporation, 2011 HRTO 1466

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 2, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent WSIB proceedings regarding workplace injury accommodation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, specifically that the respondent employer failed to accommodate his workplace injury.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred pending the conclusion of ongoing Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) proceedings.

The applicant's union also requested intervenor status.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene and deferred the application, finding that the WSIB proceedings dealt with the same factual background and human rights allegations regarding the failure to accommodate.

Chad Randell v. Ornamental Mouldings Inc., 2011 HRTO 1441

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 2, 2011

Tribunal grants applicant's request to amend damages claim and directs submissions on consolidation.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to amend her human rights Application to increase the quantum of damages sought from $30,000-$45,000 to $150,000, having subsequently obtained legal representation.

The respondents did not file a response.

The Tribunal granted the amendment, finding no clear prejudice and noting it did not change the nature of the discrimination allegations.

The Tribunal also directed the parties to provide submissions on whether the Application should be consolidated with another Application filed by a former co-worker against the same respondents.

Suriya Dostzadah v. Voysus Group Inc. and Mahdi Raza, 2011 HRTO 1446

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 2, 2011

Respondents deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondents.

The respondents failed to file a Response despite receiving a Notice of Application and a subsequent Interim Decision directing them to do so.

The Tribunal found that the respondents received notice but chose not to participate.

Consequently, pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal ordered that the respondents are deemed to have waived all rights to further notice or participation and are deemed to have accepted all allegations in the Application.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file any additional materials or advise if she wishes to make oral submissions before a final determination is made.

Emma Clements v. Duke and Duchess, 2011 HRTO 1438

Page 23 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 23 of 44 (867 cases)