Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 2, 2011

Tribunal orders consecutive hearings for spouses' applications and removes personal respondents due to corporate liability.

The applicants, who are spouses, filed separate human rights applications against their mutual employer, Wendy's Restaurant of Canada, and several personal respondents.

The Tribunal considered preliminary issues of consolidation and the removal of personal respondents.

The Tribunal declined to consolidate the applications due to a lack of common facts but ordered them to be heard consecutively by the same adjudicator.

The Tribunal also ordered the removal of all personal respondents, finding no compelling reason to keep them as the corporate respondent accepted deemed liability for their actions.

Sterling v. Wendy’s Restaurant of Canada, 2011 HRTO 1432

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 28, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent WSIB appeal regarding the same workplace injuries.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability, claiming the respondents failed to accommodate her workplace injuries.

The respondents requested early dismissal or deferral because the applicant had a concurrent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) claim regarding the same injuries, which was currently under appeal.

The Tribunal found significant factual overlap between the two proceedings and deferred the human rights application pending the conclusion of the WSIB appeal to avoid inconsistent decisions.

Joanne Badgley v. Somerville Graphics Inc. and Ken Somerville, 2011 HRTO 1413

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 28, 2011

Human rights application against Superior Court judge dismissed due to judicial immunity and limitation period expiry.

The applicant filed a human rights application against a Superior Court judge, alleging discrimination based on the judge's dismissal of his civil case.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The Tribunal found that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the application because the judge's adjudicative decisions are protected by the doctrine of judicial immunity.

Furthermore, the application was filed more than four years after the last alleged incident, and the applicant's lack of awareness of the Tribunal did not establish that the delay was incurred in good faith.

The application was dismissed.

Ahmed Chafchak v. Justice Gerald Taylor - Ontario Superior Court of Justice, 2011 HRTO 1425

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 28, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of related WSIAT proceeding to avoid conflicting findings.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, claiming she was terminated after sustaining workplace injuries and filing WSIB claims.

The applicant subsequently requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the conclusion of a related proceeding before the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT).

The Tribunal found that there was significant overlap in the facts and issues between the two proceedings, including the level of disability and benefits entitlement.

To avoid multiple concurrent proceedings and the risk of conflicting findings, the Tribunal granted the request and deferred the application pending the completion of the WSIAT process.

Flynn v. DGN Marketing Services Ltd., 2011 HRTO 1419

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 26, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent grievance arbitration regarding the same dismissal.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability regarding his termination.

A concurrent grievance arbitration concerning the same dismissal was scheduled.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer.

The respondent agreed to the deferral, while the applicant's union noted the employer was not allowing human rights submissions in the grievance.

The Tribunal deferred the application, noting that grievance arbitrators have the responsibility to enforce human rights obligations and that deferral avoids concurrent proceedings and inconsistent findings.

Robert Niven v. General Motors of Canada, 2011 HRTO 1393

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 25, 2011

Request to amend human rights application to clarify remedial claim granted.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking to amend her human rights application to clarify and augment her damages claim.

The respondent did not object to the request.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding that the proposed amendment simply clarified the remedial claim without prejudice to the respondent's position on the merits.

Lisa Marino v. Compuware Corporation of Canada, 2011 HRTO 1390

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 25, 2011

Respondent deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, specifically denial of workplace accommodation.

The respondent failed to file a Response despite receiving a Notice of Application and a subsequent Interim Decision cautioning of the consequences.

The Tribunal ordered that the respondent is deemed to have waived all rights to notice or participation and accepted all allegations in the Application pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The applicant was directed to submit additional materials and advise if she wished to make oral submissions before a final determination.

Laura Mizen v. Transcom Worldwide, 2011 HRTO 1375

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 20, 2011

Reconsideration request dismissed; applicant failed to provide a signed settlement agreement to support breach allegations.

The applicant sought reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his Application alleging a breach of settlement by the respondents.

The original application was dismissed because the applicant failed to file a copy of the written settlement as required by Rule 24.2 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for reconsideration, finding that the applicant did not satisfy any of the threshold criteria under Rule 26.5 and had only provided a letter indicating settlement discussions were at an impasse, rather than a signed settlement agreement.

Stopyn v. UAPP Union Local 67, 2011 HRTO 1370

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 18, 2011

Application dismissed where corporate respondent ceased operations and could not be contacted.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sex discrimination in employment against her former employer, a corporate entity.

The corporate respondent subsequently ceased operations and could no longer be contacted.

The applicant sought to proceed against the defunct corporation and to add its former Director as a personal respondent.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that it could not proceed against a non-existent entity that could not be contacted, and that there was no compelling reason to add the former Director as a personal respondent for actions taken strictly in a managerial capacity.

Chalifoux v. Achievement House, 2011 HRTO 1330

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 18, 2011

Union granted intervenor status; parties directed to provide submissions on consolidation of related applications.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal regarding the employer's uniform policy.

The applicant's union requested intervenor status, which the applicant partially opposed.

The Tribunal granted the union intervenor status, noting its interest as the exclusive bargaining agent.

The Tribunal also noted a similar application filed by the applicant's co-worker and directed the parties to provide submissions on whether the two applications should be consolidated.

Richard Vella v. City of Toronto, Stewart Morris and John Jansen, 2011 HRTO 1357

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 18, 2011

Union granted intervenor status; parties directed to provide submissions on consolidation of similar human rights applications.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability regarding the employer's uniform policy.

The applicant's union requested intervenor status, which the Tribunal granted in accordance with its standard practice.

Noting that the applicant's co-worker had filed a similar application raising common issues of fact and law, the Tribunal directed the parties to provide submissions on whether the two applications should be consolidated.

Victor Pak v. City of Toronto and John Janson, 2011 HRTO 1356

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 18, 2011

Respondents granted 10-day extension to file response to human rights application after missing initial deadline.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondents.

The respondents failed to file a response by the deadline set in the Notice of Application.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondents of the consequences of failing to participate under Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The Tribunal granted the respondents an additional 10 days to file a response along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice.

Turnbull v. Guild Stationers Limited, 2011 HRTO 1354

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 18, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent workplace grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed or deferred because the facts were part of ongoing workplace grievances.

The Tribunal deferred the application pending the conclusion of the applicant's grievance arbitration, noting that grievance arbitrators have the power and responsibility to enforce human rights obligations.

The Tribunal declined to rule on the respondents' request to dismiss under s. 45.1 or the applicant's request to add a personal respondent at this stage.

Vasquez v. Mount Sinai Hospital, 2011 HRTO 1353

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 18, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent union grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on race, colour, disability, and age.

The applicant's union requested to intervene, noting it had filed grievances on behalf of the applicant regarding the same allegations.

The respondent employer requested that the application be deferred pending the completion of the grievance process.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene and ordered the application deferred, finding significant factual and legal overlap between the grievances and the application.

Said Yonis v. Newalta Corporation, 2011 HRTO 1352

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 18, 2011

Union granted intervenor status; parties ordered to provide submissions on status of related grievances.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The respondent employer requested early dismissal or deferral, arguing the matter was dealt with or should be dealt with through the grievance process.

The applicant's union requested intervenor status.

The Tribunal granted the union intervenor status and ordered the parties to provide further written submissions clarifying the status of the grievances and whether any settlement appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

Tuomela v. Sault Area Hospital, 2011 HRTO 1347

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 15, 2011

Request to dismiss application under section 45.1 denied as prior employment standards proceeding did not address human rights issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, claiming she was compelled to resign after the respondent refused to accommodate her.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that a prior Ministry of Labour proceeding regarding overtime and vacation pay appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the Employment Standards decision did not address the human rights issues, such as the duty to accommodate or alleged discriminatory comments.

Manon Piche v. Kwik Cash Inc., 2011 HRTO 1341

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 15, 2011

Reconsideration request denied; applicant failed to establish grounds for reconsidering dismissal based on concurrent civil proceeding.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a decision dismissing his human rights application due to an ongoing civil proceeding.

He argued that he had abandoned his civil lawsuit and that his delay in filing the application was due to physical and mental disabilities.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding no new facts or compelling circumstances to justify reconsideration.

The Tribunal also noted that the application would have been dismissed for untimeliness regardless, as the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay.

Udhbirprasaud Joseph Bhikram v. Toronto City Police Force and Sheila Richardson, 2011 HRTO 1338

Request for interim remedy regarding supervisor monitoring dismissed as unrelated to underlying accommodation application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal based on disability regarding workplace accommodation.

He subsequently requested an interim remedy to require the employer to follow specific steps before alleging an employee is asleep on duty and to transfer a particular supervisor, fearing false allegations and potential dismissal under a new performance policy.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding the applicant failed to establish that the balance of convenience favoured the interim remedy or that it was necessary to ensure a complete and effective remedy, noting the request did not relate to the underlying application.

Akash v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2011 HRTO 1337

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 14, 2011

Respondent granted 14-day extension to file Response to Application for Contravention of Settlement.

The applicant filed an Application for Contravention of Settlement.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the required deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to participate and granting a 14-day extension to file a Response along with an explanation for the delay.

Dmytro Hladyr v. Mary Sunshine, 2011 HRTO 1334

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 8, 2011

Human rights application allowed to proceed after applicant provided supplementary information clarifying allegations against respondents.

The applicant filed a human rights application on behalf of his foster son alleging discrimination on the basis of disability.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application failed to identify specific acts of discrimination by the named respondents.

After the applicant filed supplementary materials clarifying the allegations and reducing the number of personal respondents, the Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the application fell outside its jurisdiction and ordered it to be processed and served on the respondents.

Desbiens v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2011 HRTO 1313

Page 24 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 24 of 44 (867 cases)

Ena Chadha

Sterling v. Wendy’s Restaurant of Canada, 2011 HRTO 1432

Ena Chadha

Joanne Badgley v. Somerville Graphics Inc. and Ken Somerville, 2011 HRTO 1413

Ena Chadha

Ahmed Chafchak v. Justice Gerald Taylor - Ontario Superior Court of Justice, 2011 HRTO 1425

Ena Chadha

Flynn v. DGN Marketing Services Ltd., 2011 HRTO 1419

Ena Chadha

Robert Niven v. General Motors of Canada, 2011 HRTO 1393

Ena Chadha

Lisa Marino v. Compuware Corporation of Canada, 2011 HRTO 1390

Ena Chadha

Laura Mizen v. Transcom Worldwide, 2011 HRTO 1375

Ena Chadha

Stopyn v. UAPP Union Local 67, 2011 HRTO 1370

Ena Chadha

Chalifoux v. Achievement House, 2011 HRTO 1330

Ena Chadha

Richard Vella v. City of Toronto, Stewart Morris and John Jansen, 2011 HRTO 1357

Ena Chadha

Victor Pak v. City of Toronto and John Janson, 2011 HRTO 1356

Ena Chadha

Turnbull v. Guild Stationers Limited, 2011 HRTO 1354

Ena Chadha

Vasquez v. Mount Sinai Hospital, 2011 HRTO 1353

Ena Chadha

Said Yonis v. Newalta Corporation, 2011 HRTO 1352

Ena Chadha

Tuomela v. Sault Area Hospital, 2011 HRTO 1347

Ena Chadha

Manon Piche v. Kwik Cash Inc., 2011 HRTO 1341

Ena Chadha

Udhbirprasaud Joseph Bhikram v. Toronto City Police Force and Sheila Richardson, 2011 HRTO 1338

Marni Tolensky

Carlo Di Giovanni

Ena Chadha

Akash v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2011 HRTO 1337

Ena Chadha

Dmytro Hladyr v. Mary Sunshine, 2011 HRTO 1334

Ena Chadha

Desbiens v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2011 HRTO 1313

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

for Michael Watson

for Mohammed Manjra

for OPSEU

for Paul Cohn

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

for Stanley Klimitz

for Stan Mei

for the Affected Party

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

for the Applicant

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

for the Applicants

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place