Ena Chadha is a adjudicator at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Adjudicator

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Adjudicator·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 13, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as untimely because applicant failed to establish good faith delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, over two years after her employment was terminated.

The respondents argued the application was out of time.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay and did not establish that the delay was incurred in good faith under section 34(2) of the Human Rights Code.

The application was dismissed as untimely.

Courtney v. Faurecia Automotive Seating Canada Ltd., 2011 HRTO 1855

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 12, 2011

Human rights application dismissed at preliminary stage as allegations did not engage Code-protected grounds.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on record of offences and reprisal.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the applicant admitted he had no criminal convictions but claimed the respondents treated him as if he did due to false statements by a former employer.

The Tribunal dismissed the application at a preliminary stage, finding that the allegations did not relate to the Code-protected ground of 'record of offences' and did not raise a valid claim of reprisal.

Iharosy v. Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council, 2011 HRTO 1840

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 6, 2011

Tribunal declines to dismiss human rights application at preliminary stage for delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sexual solicitation and a poisoned work environment.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be filed more than one year after the last alleged incident.

The applicant provided submissions arguing that the last incident occurred within the one-year limitation period when her request for a transfer was denied.

The Tribunal found that it was not plain and obvious that the application was outside its jurisdiction and ordered that the application be delivered to the respondents.

Winnie Yebuga v. Cineplex Entertainment Corporation and Robert Gosek, 2011 HRTO 1823

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 4, 2011

Application withdrawn against organizational respondent; individual respondents ordered to comply with response requirements.

The applicant requested to withdraw the human rights application against the organizational respondent, which the Tribunal accepted.

The Tribunal also addressed the individual respondents' failure to file complete responses.

Respondent Carter failed to file a proper Response despite multiple directions, leading the Tribunal to order that it would proceed without further notice to him under Rule 5.5.

Respondent Johnson filed an incomplete Response and was ordered to provide a full answer to Question 9 within 10 days.

Neil Michelin v. Chris Carter and Ralph Johnson, 2011 HRTO 1796

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 4, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment.

The respondents noted an ongoing criminal matter between the parties.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file submissions on whether the application should be deferred pending the criminal matter.

The applicant failed to file submissions or communicate with the Tribunal.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Keliann Lewis v. IMS Incorporation and Leon d’Ancona, 2011 HRTO 1801

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 4, 2011

Tribunal permitted applicant to amend human rights application to cite disability instead of record of offences.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of 'record of offences' after being dismissed while on disability leave following a motor vehicle accident.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss as the application lacked facts supporting a 'record of offences' claim.

The applicant subsequently sought to amend her application to cite 'disability' as the ground of discrimination.

The Tribunal found it plain and obvious that the allegations pertained to disability and permitted the amendment, directing the respondent to file a full response.

Linda Oldenhof v. TS Environmental Services, 2011 HRTO 1793

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 3, 2011

Tribunal granted applicant's request on consent to amend human rights application to add disability ground.

The applicant filed an Application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex, claiming her employment was terminated due to absences related to fertility treatment.

The applicant subsequently filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to amend her Application to include the ground of disability.

The respondents consented to the amendment.

The Tribunal granted the request to amend the Application and directed the applicant to file an amended Application with particulars by December 12, 2011, accommodating her request for an extension of time due to a family medical emergency.

Meak v. Ottawa Mould Craft Ltd., 2011 HRTO 1789

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 30, 2011

Respondents' request for early disclosure of applicant's medical records denied as premature; time extension granted.

The respondents in a human rights application alleging racial discrimination in employment brought a request for an order during proceedings.

They sought an extension of time to file their response and an order compelling the applicant to produce his medical advisory service file.

The Tribunal denied the request for medical records as premature, noting that the core allegations of racial discrimination could be answered without them and that document disclosure normally occurs after pleadings are closed.

The Tribunal granted the extension of time because key individuals needed to prepare the response were unavailable due to family emergencies, retirement, and summer holidays.

Garnette Rose v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2011 HRTO 1784

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 29, 2011

Request to remove personal respondents granted as allegations pertained solely to their employment roles.

The respondents filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to remove the two personal respondents from the Application, arguing that the corporate respondent had been added and the allegations related to the personal respondents' actions in their employment capacity.

The applicant did not file submissions.

Applying the Persaud factors, the Tribunal found no compelling reason to continue the proceeding against the personal respondents, as the allegations pertained to their employment roles and the corporate respondent was in the best position to satisfy any potential remedies.

The request was granted and the personal respondents were removed.

Mark Oproiu v. ATG Communications Group, 2011 HRTO 1775

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 28, 2011

Human rights application permitted to proceed against respondent corporation that dissolved after the application was filed.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex (pregnancy).

Nine months later, the respondent corporation dissolved and sought to cancel mediation and discontinue the application.

The Tribunal held that pursuant to section 242(1)(a) of the Business Corporations Act, an administrative proceeding commenced against a corporation before its dissolution may be continued.

The Tribunal directed the application to proceed and ordered the respondent to file the complete Certificate of Articles of Dissolution.

Keana-Nicole Olegario v. The Oxygen Specialists, Inc., 2011 HRTO 1768

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 12, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned following the applicant's death and lack of response from estate.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of age.

The respondent union subsequently informed the Tribunal that the applicant had passed away.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction to determine if an estate trustee intended to proceed with the application.

After receiving no response within the specified timeframe, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Dolly LeBlanc v. Ontario Public Service Employees Union Local 500, 2011 HRTO 1679

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 9, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent Landlord and Tenant Board proceedings.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in housing on the basis of family status.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the parties were involved in concurrent proceedings before the Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) dealing with the same underlying facts.

Despite the applicant's opposition due to her family's planned departure from Canada, the Tribunal deferred the application, finding that proceeding concurrently risked inconsistent findings of fact and law.

Tsoref v. Frastell Property Management Inc., 2011 HRTO 1673

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 8, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as duplicative of an ongoing civil action based on the same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and harassment based on disability and age by his supervisor.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code because the applicant had commenced a civil action based on the same facts.

The Tribunal found that the civil claim and the application were duplicative, asserting parallel allegations and seeking overlapping remedies.

The application was dismissed.

Chaves v. General Electric Canada Inc., 2011 HRTO 1659

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 7, 2011

Tribunal declined to defer disability discrimination application because WSIB lacked jurisdiction over the non-compensable condition.

The applicant filed an application alleging disability discrimination, claiming the employer rescinded a return-to-work offer because it could not accommodate his Multiple Sclerosis, despite accommodating a compensable elbow injury.

The Tribunal considered whether to defer the application pending the applicant's ongoing Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) process.

The applicant opposed deferral, providing evidence that the WSIB declined jurisdiction over the non-compensable Multiple Sclerosis condition.

The Tribunal held that deferral was not warranted because the human rights allegations were not the subject of the WSIB proceeding.

The Tribunal ordered the application to proceed and directed the respondent to file a response.

Johnson v. Direct Fire Protection, 2011 HRTO 1655

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 1, 2011

Tribunal removes personal respondent and declines to order costs or compel attendance at voluntary mediation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

The respondents requested the removal of the personal respondent, while the applicant requested costs and an order compelling the respondents to attend mediation after they withdrew their consent to mediate.

The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's requests, noting it lacks jurisdiction to award legal costs and that mediation is voluntary.

The Tribunal granted the respondents' request to remove the personal respondent, applying the Persaud factors and finding that the personal respondent acted within the scope of his employment and the corporate respondent could satisfy any potential remedies.

Tadros v. Salice Canada, 2011 HRTO 1640

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 1, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent OLRB proceeding on same facts.

The respondent requested an order to defer the human rights application pending the conclusion of an ongoing Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) proceeding involving the same facts.

The applicant did not file submissions in response.

The Tribunal granted the request, noting that deferral is appropriate to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions, and deferred the application pending the completion of the OLRB proceeding.

Kharal v. Oakville United Taxi, 2011 HRTO 1639

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 31, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to jurisdictional notice.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code against Bell Canada.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, noting that the respondent appeared to be a federally regulated business and the application failed to identify specific acts of discrimination.

The applicant was directed to provide written submissions but failed to do so.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Emerence Miakanda v. Bell Canada, 2011 HRTO 1631

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 31, 2011

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and abandonment after applicant failed to respond.

The applicant filed an application alleging reprisal with respect to services, goods, and facilities.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application failed to identify any specific acts of discrimination or reprisal related to a Code-protected ground.

The applicant failed to provide written submissions regarding the Tribunal's jurisdiction as directed.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding it did not fall within its jurisdiction and deeming it abandoned due to the applicant's failure to respond.

S.O. v. Joanne Chapman School of Dance, 2011 HRTO 1635

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 30, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned due to applicant's failure to communicate with the Tribunal.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation and subsequently failed to respond to multiple communications from the Tribunal, including directions to provide available dates for mediation and to confirm his intentions regarding the application.

The Tribunal warned that failure to respond would result in the application being deemed abandoned.

As no response was received, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Coombs v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2011 HRTO 1525

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 30, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of a concurrent union grievance on the same issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and place of origin.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred because the subject matter was also the subject of a pending union grievance.

The Tribunal found significant overlap between the application and the grievance, which was anticipated to proceed to arbitration.

To avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent findings, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievance process.

Miroslav Radic v. The Town of Oakville, 2011 HRTO 1624

Page 22 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 22 of 44 (867 cases)