Dan Weagant is a member at the Assessment Review Board with 252 decisions on record from 2015 to 2025. Key areas include property tax assessment, administrative law, other tribunals.

What tribunal does Dan Weagant sit on?

Dan Weagant sits on the Assessment Review Board.

What areas of law does Dan Weagant decide?

Dan Weagant's most common areas include Property Tax Assessment (252 decisions), Administrative Law (42 decisions), Other Tribunals (7 decisions). Dan Weagant has handled 252 decisions across 3 areas.

How many decisions has Dan Weagant made?

Dan Weagant has 252 decisions on record from 2015 to 2025.

Who frequently appears before Dan Weagant?

Representatives who frequently appear before Dan Weagant include Sean Doyle, Sean Doyle, William Somerville.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Dan Weagant — Member

Property Tax Assessment

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Dan Weagant

Member·Assessment Review Board·Since 2015

252

cases · 11 yrs · OARB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Member· 209Member· 27Member· 11MEMBER· 3MEMBER· 1MEMBER· 1

Joseph Jebreen

OARB0 cases2018–2019

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMar 20, 2019

Property assessment reduced to $335,000 based on comparable sales; appellant's alternative valuation methods rejected.

The appellant appealed the property assessment of her single-family residential dwelling for the 2017 and 2018 taxation years.

MPAC had assessed the property at $387,000 but recommended a value of $351,000 at the hearing based on the direct comparison approach.

The appellant argued for a value of $260,740 using various alternative methods and raised numerous allegations of human rights violations and deceptive practices by MPAC.

The Assessment Review Board rejected the appellant's valuation methods and allegations, but found that based on the comparable sales evidence, the correct current value was $335,000.

The Board found no evidence to support a further reduction for equity purposes.

Grace Joubarne v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation ("MPAC") Region 03 and City of Ottawa, 2019 CanLII 22897

Christopher Henderson

3 cases2015–2019

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMar 7, 2019

Appeal regarding property tax apportionment dismissed because there were no unpaid taxes to apportion.

The appellants appealed a decision of the City of Toronto regarding the apportionment of property taxes to their condominium unit following its registration.

The appellants argued the taxes apportioned for the 2016 taxation year were too high.

The Assessment Review Board found that under section 322 of the City of Toronto Act, an appeal regarding apportionment requires that the taxes be unpaid.

Because the evidence demonstrated there were no unpaid taxes, the Board determined there was no statutory basis for the appeal and dismissed it.

Jea Yu Yang v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 18815

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMar 6, 2019

Assessment Review Board accepts parties' agreed apportionment of property assessment for commercial and excess land.

The City of London appealed the property assessment for 977 Oxford Street East.

Following previous interim decisions determining the current value and the area of excess land, the parties were directed to make submissions on the apportionment of the assessment.

The parties reached an agreement on the apportionment, which the Assessment Review Board accepted, finalizing the assessment at $314,000 for the 2015 and 2016 taxation years.

City of London v. 8768013 Canada Ltd., 2019 CanLII 18814

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMar 4, 2019

Property tax relief application dismissed as applicant's household income significantly exceeded monthly expenses.

The applicant applied for a cancellation, reduction, or refund of his 2017 property taxes under s. 357(1)(d1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, claiming an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board reviewed the applicant's financial situation, noting that the household's monthly income exceeded expenses by over $3,000 and that the 2017 property taxes had already been paid in full.

The Board found that the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay the property taxes and dismissed the application.

R.A. and A.A. v. City of Mississauga, 2019 CanLII 18806

Property taxes cancelled as applicant demonstrated inability to pay due to extreme poverty.

The applicant appealed to the Assessment Review Board to have her 2017 property taxes cancelled due to extreme poverty under section 323(1)(e) of the City of Toronto Act.

The Board found that the applicant's monthly expenses for basic necessities exceeded her household income, which consisted primarily of social assistance and child tax benefits.

The Board concluded the applicant was in a condition of extreme poverty and cancelled the 2017 property taxes in the amount of $3,463.73.

A.M.C. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 18809

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMar 4, 2019

Property assessment confirmed at returned value where appellant failed to attend and no notice of increase given.

The appellant appealed the property assessment of $288,000 for the 2017 and 2018 taxation years but failed to attend the hearing.

The Board proceeded in the appellant's absence.

Based on MPAC's evidence, the Board determined the current value of the property to be $344,000 and applied an equity reduction to $332,000.

However, because neither MPAC nor the Town gave notice of an intention to seek a higher assessment, the Board confirmed the assessment at the returned value of $288,000.

Kamen Laptev v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, Region 27, 2019 CanLII 18810

Luis Verastegui

6 cases2016–2019

Graham Thomson

Practising Law - Employed24 cases2019–2025

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardFeb 26, 2019

Application for property tax relief dismissed as applicant failed to demonstrate inability to pay.

The applicant applied to the City of Toronto for a reduction, cancellation, or refund of her 2017 property taxes, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty under section 323(1)(e) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

The Assessment Review Board reviewed the applicant's household income, expenses, and bank balances.

The Board found that the applicant's household had sufficient funds to meet its monthly obligations, including property taxes, and maintained a bank balance of over $6,000 at the end of 2017.

Consequently, the Board concluded the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay and dismissed the application.

N.N. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 16519

Jared Wherle

1 case2019–2019

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardFeb 22, 2019

Property tax relief application dismissed after applicant failed to attend and evidence showed taxes were paid.

The applicant applied for a reduction or cancellation of his 2017 property taxes under s. 323(1)(e) of the City of Toronto Act, citing sickness or extreme poverty.

The applicant failed to attend the peremptory hearing.

The City presented evidence that the applicant owned multiple properties with significant equity and had already paid his 2017 taxes in full.

The Assessment Review Board proceeded in the applicant's absence and dismissed the application, finding no demonstrated inability to pay.

C.D. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 14357

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardFeb 21, 2019

Property assessment reduced for 2018 based on sales comparison approach; 2017 assessment confirmed.

The appellants appealed the property assessments of their 16.9-acre rural residential property for the 2017 and 2018 taxation years.

The Assessment Review Board rejected the appellants' approach of applying a percentage increase to the previous assessment, preferring MPAC's sales comparison approach.

The Board determined the current value to be $186,000 based on the time-adjusted sales of two comparable properties.

The Board found no evidence to support a reduction for equitable assessment.

The 2017 assessment was confirmed at $183,000 to avoid an unfair increase without notice, and the 2018 assessment was reduced from $221,000 to $186,000.

Parazader v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 14356

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardFeb 21, 2019

Application for property tax relief dismissed as applicant failed to demonstrate inability to pay.

The applicant applied to the City of Mississauga for a reduction, cancellation, or refund of his 2017 property taxes under s. 357(1)(d1) of the Municipal Act, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board reviewed the applicant's household income and expenses, noting that the family's monthly income exceeded their expenses and they had no mortgage or reported debt.

The Board found that the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay the property taxes and dismissed the application.

A.K.F. v. City of Mississauga, 2019 CanLII 14355

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardFeb 21, 2019

Property tax relief appeal dismissed; appellant failed to demonstrate inability to pay.

The appellant applied to the municipality for a reduction, cancellation, or refund of her 2016 property taxes under s. 357(7) of the Municipal Act, 2001, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The municipality denied the application, and the appellant appealed to the Assessment Review Board.

The Board reviewed the appellant's financial situation, noting a household income of approximately $58,790, a bank balance exceeding $9,000 at the end of the year, and that the 2016 property taxes had been fully paid.

The Board found that the appellant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay the property taxes and dismissed the appeal.

R.S.A. v. City of Windsor, 2019 CanLII 14353

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardFeb 21, 2019

Property assessment reduced to $1,077,000 based on the best comparable sale; no equity reduction warranted.

The appellant appealed the property assessment of their single-family dwelling for the 2017 and 2018 taxation years, originally assessed at $1,433,000.

MPAC recommended a reduced value of $1,306,000 following an inspection.

The Assessment Review Board found the best comparable sale indicated a current value of $1,077,000.

The Board further determined that no reduction was necessary for equitable assessment purposes, as similar properties in the vicinity were generally assessed above their current value.

The assessment was reduced to $1,077,000.

Constantine Zygoumis v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 14351

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardFeb 5, 2019

Property assessment reduced to $301,000 based on time-adjusted purchase price and equitable assessment principles.

The appellants appealed the property assessment of their single-family dwelling, which was assessed at $332,000 for the 2017 and 2018 taxation years.

They argued the assessment should reflect their June 2014 purchase price of $260,000.

The Assessment Review Board found the estate sale was a valid indicator of current value and applied a time adjustment factor to determine a current value of $315,000.

The Board further reduced this value to $301,000 after finding that similar properties in the vicinity were assessed below their current values, applying a mean assessment-to-sale ratio of 0.955 to achieve equitable assessment.

Mark Denomme and Paris Denomme v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 27 and City of Windsor, 2019 CanLII 9704

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardFeb 1, 2019

Property taxes reduced by $2,501 due to applicant's inability to pay caused by extreme poverty.

The applicant applied to the municipality for a reduction, cancellation, or refund of her 2016 property taxes under s. 357(1)(d1) of the Municipal Act, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board, acting under delegated authority, reviewed the applicant's financial situation, including her income, expenses, and lack of discretionary spending.

The Board found that the applicant was unable to pay her property taxes in full due to extreme poverty.

The Board granted the application and reduced the 2016 property taxes by $2,501.

T.T. v. City of Mississauga, 2019 CanLII 7202

Luis Verastegui

6 cases2016–2019

J. Boyczuk

8 cases2017–2024

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJan 31, 2019

Property tax refund partially granted due to extreme poverty, less amounts contributed to an RRSP.

The applicant applied for a cancellation, reduction, or refund of her 2017 property taxes under section 323(1)(e) of the City of Toronto Act, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board found that the applicant demonstrated extreme poverty, with monthly expenses significantly exceeding her income.

However, because the applicant contributed $1,593.25 to an RRSP during the taxation year, the Board determined those funds were available to pay taxes.

The Board ordered a partial refund of $702.67, representing the total taxes levied minus the RRSP contribution.

A.D. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 7186

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJan 21, 2019

Property assessment confirmed at returned value because respondents failed to give notice for higher assessment.

The appellant appealed the 2017 property assessment of their residential property, arguing the returned value of $1,618,000 was too high.

The Assessment Review Board determined the current value of the property to be $1,751,000 based on comparable sales.

After applying an adjustment for equitable assessment, the value was reduced to $1,683,000.

However, because neither the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation nor the municipality provided notice of an intention to seek a higher assessment, the Board confirmed the original assessment of $1,618,000 for the 2017 and deemed 2018 taxation years.

Carey Eidlitz v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 5476

Luis Verastegui

6 cases2016–2019

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJan 16, 2019

Property tax relief application dismissed as the applicant's RRSP assets demonstrated an ability to pay.

The applicant applied to the City of Toronto to have his 2017 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded due to sickness or extreme poverty under s. 323(1)(e) of the City of Toronto Act.

The Assessment Review Board found that while the applicant lived a modest lifestyle and had mental health challenges, he possessed significant RRSP assets that exceeded his liabilities.

Consequently, the Board determined the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay the property taxes and dismissed the application.

R.S. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 3427

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJan 9, 2019

Island property assessment reduced to $509,000 based on direct comparison approach; no equity reduction warranted.

The appellant appealed the 2017 and 2018 property assessment of an island property in the Township of the Archipelago, which was assessed at $839,000.

The Assessment Review Board found that the best comparable property supported a current value of $509,000, rejecting MPAC's higher valuation based on properties with superior quality ratings.

The Board further found no evidence to support a reduction for equitable assessment purposes, as MPAC's equity analysis indicated the assessment was fair.

The appeal was allowed, and the assessment was reduced to $509,000.

2251210 Ontario Inc. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 1218

Graham Thomson

Practising Law - Employed24 cases2019–2025

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJan 7, 2019

Property tax relief application dismissed as household income exceeded expenses and obligations were being met.

The applicant applied to have his 2016 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded under s. 323(1)(e) of the City of Toronto Act, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board reviewed the applicant's household income, expenses, and assets.

The Board found that the household's monthly income exceeded its expenses by over $900, and the family was meeting its monthly obligations, including property taxes.

Consequently, the Board concluded the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay and dismissed the application.

M.M. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 1217

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJan 4, 2019

Property assessment reduced to $275,000 based on modified direct comparison and cost approaches.

The appellants appealed the property assessment of their 10-acre farm property for the 2017 and 2018 taxation years.

MPAC assessed the property at $292,000, while the appellants argued for a value of approximately $180,000.

The Assessment Review Board evaluated the competing valuation methods, preferring MPAC's cost approach for the buildings and a modified direct comparison approach for the land.

The Board determined the current value of the property to be $275,000 and found no reduction was necessary for equitable assessment.

Bessy Stavrou v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 288

Page 8 of 13 (252 cases)

assisted the Applicant

A.E.-G.Agent
1 appearance

for 1490804 Ontario Limited and Angie Cormpilas

Angie CormpilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

for 2320480 Ontario Limited

Geoff WattsAgent
1 appearance

for 2440781 Ontario Limited

Akbar BapooAgent
1 appearance

for 3022056 Canada Inc.

Paul GrosmanCounsel
1 appearance

for 409315 Ontario Ltd.

William John BakerAgent
1 appearance

for 440 Elizabeth Street Holding and 440 Elizabeth Street Holdings Ltd.

Andrew AttardAgent
1 appearance
Daniel AttardAgent
1 appearance

for 625041 Ontario Limited

Peter StavrouCounsel
1 appearance

for 8768013 Canada Ltd.

Erin PicklesAgent
2 appearances
Jeff PicklesAgent
2 appearances
Ratha HalfordAgent
1 appearance

for Aipco Inc.

Benjamin FriedSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Amalie Holdings Limited

Paul GrosmanAgent
1 appearance

for Amos Weber and Betsy Hoover Weber

Abram WeberAgent
1 appearance

for Bell Canada

Daniel RosmanCounsel
1 appearance
Richard MinsterCounsel
1 appearance

for Bryfam Enterprises Inc.

Tammy BrysonAgent
1 appearance
Tim BrysonAgent
1 appearance

for Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc.

Mark BlidnerCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Burlington

Paul LacelleAgent
1 appearance
P. LacelleAgent
1 appearance

for City of Greater Sudbury

Dan RosmanCounsel
2 appearances
Richard MinsterCounsel
2 appearances

for City of Hamilton

John O’KaneAgent
2 appearances

for City of London

Brian ShimlaAgent
2 appearances

for City of Niagara Falls

John O’KaneCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Ottawa

Guy TudinoAgent
1 appearance

for City of Thunder Bay

Guy TudinoCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Woodstock (observing only)

Diane CampbellAgent
1 appearance

for CRH Canada Inc.

D. RosmanCounsel
2 appearances
R. MinsterCounsel
2 appearances

for Dennis Abram Driedger, Karen Anne Driedger, and A. Driedger Farms Inc.

Dennis DriedgerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for D. Murray Ventures Inc.

Patrick PrendergastAgent
1 appearance

for EMD Canada Acquisition Co.

Bob PattersonAgent
1 appearance

for Fellowship Wilderness Camp

Stu BurkholderAgent
1 appearance

for Firestone Textiles Company

Drew SamuelsAgent
1 appearance

for Glencore Canada Corporation

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Karina WongCounsel
1 appearance

for Glencore Canada Corporation (formerly Xstrata Canada Corporation)

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Karina WongCounsel
1 appearance

for Greater Toronto Airports Authority

Thomas W. BarlowCounsel
1 appearance

for H.A. and A.S.M.

H.A.Self-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Ken RaySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Host Hospitality Inc.

G. GrewalAgent
1 appearance

for J & S Holdings Inc. and Gary Mayers

Gary MayersSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kamoaks Limited

Thomas ReveszAgent
1 appearance

for Kaprod Holdings Ltd.

P. GrosmanParalegal
1 appearance

for Millford Development Limited

Andrew WinkworthAgent
2 appearances
Mike GuillemetteAgent
2 appearances

for MPAC

William SomervilleAgent
7 appearances
Pierre LefebvreAgent
6 appearances
Justin JohnstoneAgent
6 appearances
Louise St. JeanAgent
5 appearances
Toban EdmundsAgent
5 appearances
Frank SheaCounsel
3 appearances
Ian JohnstoneCounsel
3 appearances
Don MitchellCounsel
3 appearances
Antonietta Romano-BitontiAgent
3 appearances
William SomervilleCounsel
3 appearances
Wayne WilliamsAgent
3 appearances
Tony PileggiAgent
3 appearances
Bonnie MickAgent
2 appearances
Erin ComeauAgent
2 appearances
Jessie YuAgent
2 appearances
John ColeAgent
2 appearances
John TaraborrelliAgent
2 appearances
Corinne Van RaayAgent
2 appearances
Jane Sokol-KennedyAgent
2 appearances
Geoff HigginsonAgent
2 appearances

for Municipality of Brockton

Trish BagloleAgent
1 appearance

for Municipal Property Assessment Corporation

Sarah CormanCounsel
2 appearances
Hilary BrownCounsel
2 appearances
Melissa VanBerkumCounsel
2 appearances
Michael RadanAgent
2 appearances
Leo ChapdelaineAgent
1 appearance
Loris FataAgent
1 appearance
Michael RadanCounsel
1 appearance
Adam ParkerAgent
1 appearance
Carrie CaroneCounsel
1 appearance
Damian BernacikAgent
1 appearance
Francis X. SheaCounsel
1 appearance
George KaldenbachAgent
1 appearance

for North American Railway Hall of Fame

Larry LongfieldAgent
2 appearances
Paul SmithAgent
2 appearances
Matt JanesAgent
2 appearances

for Nuance Group Canada Inc., The Nuance Group Canada Inc., and Nuance Global Traders Inc.

Peter A. MilliganCounsel
1 appearance
James G. WalkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Parkyards Inc.

Lukas KwiatkowskiAgent
1 appearance

for Rutherford Properties Ltd.

Chandelle HamiltonAgent
1 appearance
Colin FrancisAgent
1 appearance

for Sota Holdings Ltd.

Dorota MarshallAgent
2 appearances

for Stelco Inc.

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren LackieCounsel
1 appearance

for Stephanie Bowman and David Farwell

Surin ToorAgent
1 appearance

for St. Mary’s Cement Inc. (Canada); Capital Paving Inc; Preston Sand and Gravel Company; 2416854 Ontario Inc.

J. CowanCounsel
2 appearances

for Syed Raza and Sadia Raza

Marc KemererCounsel
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Robert BaranowskiAgent
6 appearances
Surin ToorAgent
3 appearances
Andrew WinkworthAgent
3 appearances
Mike GuillemetteAgent
3 appearances
Gurjit S. GrewalSelf-represented
2 appearances
Andrew AttardAgent
2 appearances
Peter TamAgent
2 appearances
Alan Benjamin YoungSelf-represented
1 appearance
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance
Allan HolmesAgent
1 appearance
A.M.C.Self-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PetersenAgent
1 appearance
Arwa MhawiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bernard CassarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brendan ChartersAgent
1 appearance
Charles DobuckiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cindy AsselstineSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eugene SawchukAgent
1 appearance
F. R.Self-represented
1 appearance
Garth AllenAgent
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Harry BattuSelf-represented
2 appearances
James CraneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dawn Marie GriffithSelf-represented
2 appearances
Steven Scott GriffithSelf-represented
2 appearances
Bernarda KrasowskiSelf-represented
2 appearances
Arnold AugspolsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Craig LaneSelf-represented
1 appearance
David Van SegbrookSelf-represented
1 appearance
Debbie-Jane Prada-SheaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dianne Elizabeth MillarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald RennickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Earnest LightSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward SheaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Elizabeth DeMerchantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eugene Stewart DoreySelf-represented
1 appearance
Fritz NussbergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gary CaseSelf-represented
1 appearance
George ParazaderSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn McNeilSelf-represented
1 appearance
James Edward CraneSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

J.K.Self-represented
2 appearances
P.B.Agent
2 appearances
P.S.Self-represented
2 appearances
R.A.Self-represented
2 appearances
C.A.Agent
1 appearance
D. D.Self-represented
1 appearance
D.N.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.C.Agent
1 appearance
G.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
G.C.Agent
1 appearance
G.E.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
G. H.Self-represented
1 appearance
I.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.E.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.O.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.P.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
K.P.Self-represented
1 appearance
K.S.Agent
1 appearance

for the Applicants

N.P.R.Self-represented
2 appearances
V.R.Self-represented
2 appearances
J.G.Self-represented
2 appearances
I.R-B.Self-represented
1 appearance
I.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.Y. and M.Y.Self-represented
1 appearance
L.G.Self-represented
1 appearance
M.I.Self-represented
1 appearance
M.N.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.C.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
O.I.Self-represented
1 appearance
P.S.Agent
1 appearance
R.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
R.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
R.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
U.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
V.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
Y.S.K.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Assessed

Eli MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Assessed Person

Erin PicklesAgent
1 appearance
Jeff PicklesAgent
1 appearance
Ratha HalfordAgent
1 appearance

for the Assessed Persons

Isaak Penner DoerksenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manassah Martin DoerksenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the City of Brampton

Aida KarremanAgent
4 appearances

for the City of Burlington

Paul LacelleAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Cambridge

David HotsonAgent
2 appearances
Kendra SchollAgent
2 appearances
Shawn McConkeyAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Hamilton

Linda NimakoAgent
4 appearances
Irwin SampatAgent
3 appearances
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance
John O’KaneCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kitchener

Paul YeomanAgent
1 appearance

for the City of London

Brian ShimlaAgent
2 appearances
Geoff BelchCounsel
1 appearance
James EdmundsAgent
1 appearance

for the City of London and Brian Shimla

Geoff BelchCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Mississauga

Sean DoyleAgent
8 appearances
Sean DoyleCounsel
2 appearances
Barb MaltaAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Niagara Falls

Stephanie YoungAgent
1 appearance
Amber FergusonAgent
1 appearance
Anthony ScaringiAgent
1 appearance
Miranda AdamsonAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Thunder Bay

Vince DesandoAgent
3 appearances

for the City of Toronto

Graham ThomsonCounsel
5 appearances
Luis VerasteguiCounsel
4 appearances
J. BoyczukCounsel
3 appearances
Georgia KarakolisAgent
1 appearance
Graham ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance
Graham ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Jared WherleCounsel
1 appearance
Jennifer BoyczukCounsel
1 appearance
Laura NymanCounsel
1 appearance
Luis VerasteguiAgent
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarCounsel
1 appearance
Alison MintoffCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarAgent
1 appearance
Amy TieuCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Windsor

Janice GuthrieAgent
1 appearance
Jose MejalliAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Dorothy GibbonsAgent
1 appearance
Joel FarberCounsel
1 appearance

for The Corporation of the City of Mississauga

Brad TeichmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the County of Lambton and City of Sarnia

Donald DaviesAgent
1 appearance
Gaetano TudinoAgent
1 appearance

for the County of Wellington

C. KuehlCounsel
2 appearances
R. ShoomCounsel
2 appearances

for the Estate of Peter Dyriw and Roman Dyriw

Roman DyriwSelf-represented
1 appearance

for themselves

Damian Anthony SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michelle Lynne SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Municipality

Dennis DoyleAgent
1 appearance
William DakinAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Greenstone

Jack KuzminskiAgent
1 appearance
Lorne ChristensonAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Huron Shores

Deborah TonelliAgent
2 appearances

for the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation

Tim OberleAgent
4 appearances
Jessie YuAgent
2 appearances
D. MitchellCounsel
2 appearances
J. BarlowCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie DeWinterAgent
2 appearances
Michael RadanAgent
2 appearances
Sheryl McRobertsAgent
2 appearances
Terence JohnstonAgent
2 appearances
Damian BernacikAgent
1 appearance
Amanda GordonAgent
1 appearance
Donald MitchellCounsel
1 appearance
Evan MendelAgent
1 appearance
Helene BlackburnAgent
1 appearance
Jacqui IrwinAgent
1 appearance
Tanya Janeczek-BoyleAgent
1 appearance
Amber WalshAgent
1 appearance
John HyattAgent
1 appearance
Kalin DoucetAgent
1 appearance
Karen BallAgent
1 appearance
Tara JonesAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Sean DoyleAgent
12 appearances
Sean DoyleCounsel
6 appearances
Jennifer BoyczukCounsel
3 appearances
Laura NymanCounsel
2 appearances
Melanie ShankarAgent
2 appearances
Georgia TannerCounsel
1 appearance
Graham ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance
Irwin SampatAgent
1 appearance
James EdmundsAgent
1 appearance
Jennifer ErringtonAgent
1 appearance
Justin JohnstoneAgent
1 appearance
Linda LiottiAgent
1 appearance
Linda NimakoAgent
1 appearance
Luis VerasteguiCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarCounsel
1 appearance
Paul HettingaCounsel
1 appearance
Sue StraughanAgent
1 appearance
Y. KwiecienAgent
1 appearance
A. KarremanAgent
1 appearance
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Halton Hills

Elizabeth van RavensAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Newmarket

Dora WohlsteinAgent
1 appearance
Grace MarshAgent
1 appearance
Paul VoornCounsel
1 appearance
Selene AliAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Oakville

Susan PriceAgent
5 appearances

for the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville

Tracy ParsonsAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Johnson

Herman KlingenbergAgent
5 appearances

for the Township of King

Alice LiuAgent
1 appearance
Karen WoottonAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Laird

Jennifer ErringtonAgent
2 appearances

for the Township of Zorra

Kelly HallAgent
1 appearance

for Timberland Equipment Limited

Paul J. SmithAgent
3 appearances
Loryn LuxAgent
2 appearances

for Town of Halton Hills

Elizabeth van RavensAgent
1 appearance

for Town of Leamington

Laura RauchAgent
2 appearances
Ginny CampbellAgent
1 appearance
Delores JefferyAgent
1 appearance

for Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville

Tracy ParsonsAgent
1 appearance

for T Valeri Construction Limited

Paul GrosmanAgent
2 appearances

for Vale Canada Limited

Belinda SchubertCounsel
2 appearances
Philip SanfordCounsel
2 appearances

for Werh Group Inc.

Bonnie PetroAgent
1 appearance

for Z.C.

E.C.Agent
1 appearance

Self-represented

P.H.Self-represented
1 appearance

252

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

2.0

cases/mo

OARB252(100%)

Decision types

appeal

202

trial

motion

Page 8 of 13 (252 cases)

Joseph Jebreen

Dan Weagant

Grace Joubarne v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation ("MPAC") Region 03 and City of Ottawa, 2019 CanLII 22897

Christopher Henderson

Dan Weagant

Jea Yu Yang v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 18815

Dan Weagant

City of London v. 8768013 Canada Ltd., 2019 CanLII 18814

Dan Weagant

R.A. and A.A. v. City of Mississauga, 2019 CanLII 18806

Luis Verastegui

Jennifer Boyczuk

Dan Weagant

A.M.C. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 18809

Dan Weagant

Kamen Laptev v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, Region 27, 2019 CanLII 18810

Luis Verastegui

Graham Thomson

Dan Weagant

N.N. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 16519

Jared Wherle

Dan Weagant

C.D. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 14357

Dan Weagant

Parazader v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 14356

Dan Weagant

A.K.F. v. City of Mississauga, 2019 CanLII 14355

Dan Weagant

R.S.A. v. City of Windsor, 2019 CanLII 14353

Dan Weagant

Constantine Zygoumis v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 14351

Dan Weagant

Mark Denomme and Paris Denomme v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 27 and City of Windsor, 2019 CanLII 9704

Dan Weagant

T.T. v. City of Mississauga, 2019 CanLII 7202

Luis Verastegui

J. Boyczuk

Dan Weagant

A.D. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 7186

Dan Weagant

Carey Eidlitz v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 5476

Luis Verastegui

Dan Weagant

R.S. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 3427

Dan Weagant

2251210 Ontario Inc. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 1218

Graham Thomson

Dan Weagant

M.M. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 1217

Dan Weagant

Bessy Stavrou v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 288

assisted the Applicant

for 1490804 Ontario Limited and Angie Cormpilas

for 2320480 Ontario Limited

for 2440781 Ontario Limited

for 3022056 Canada Inc.

for 409315 Ontario Ltd.

for 440 Elizabeth Street Holding and 440 Elizabeth Street Holdings Ltd.

for 625041 Ontario Limited

for 8768013 Canada Ltd.

for Aipco Inc.

for Amalie Holdings Limited

for Amos Weber and Betsy Hoover Weber

for Bell Canada

for Bryfam Enterprises Inc.

for Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc.

for City of Burlington

for City of Greater Sudbury

for City of Hamilton

for City of London

for City of Niagara Falls

for City of Ottawa

for City of Thunder Bay

for City of Woodstock (observing only)

for CRH Canada Inc.

for Dennis Abram Driedger, Karen Anne Driedger, and A. Driedger Farms Inc.

for D. Murray Ventures Inc.

for EMD Canada Acquisition Co.

for Fellowship Wilderness Camp

for Firestone Textiles Company