Dan Weagant is a member at the Assessment Review Board with 252 decisions on record from 2015 to 2025. Key areas include property tax assessment, administrative law, other tribunals.

What tribunal does Dan Weagant sit on?

Dan Weagant sits on the Assessment Review Board.

What areas of law does Dan Weagant decide?

Dan Weagant's most common areas include Property Tax Assessment (252 decisions), Administrative Law (42 decisions), Other Tribunals (7 decisions). Dan Weagant has handled 252 decisions across 3 areas.

How many decisions has Dan Weagant made?

Dan Weagant has 252 decisions on record from 2015 to 2025.

Who frequently appears before Dan Weagant?

Representatives who frequently appear before Dan Weagant include Sean Doyle, Sean Doyle, William Somerville.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Dan Weagant — Member

Property Tax Assessment

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Dan Weagant

Member·Assessment Review Board·Since 2015

252

cases · 11 yrs · OARB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Member· 209Member· 27Member· 11MEMBER· 3MEMBER· 1MEMBER· 1

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardSep 11, 2019

Property tax refund granted where applicant demonstrated inability to pay due to extreme poverty.

The applicant applied to the City of Hamilton for a refund of his 2018 property taxes under s. 357(1)(d1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, citing an inability to pay due to extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board found that the applicant's monthly expenses for basic necessities consistently exceeded his income, forcing him to incur additional mortgage debt to meet his obligations.

The Board concluded that the applicant demonstrated a condition of extreme poverty and ordered a full refund of the $2,297.84 in property taxes levied for 2018.

D. D. v. City of Hamilton, 2019 CanLII 86388

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardSep 3, 2019

Property tax relief appeal dismissed as appellant failed to provide evidence of expenses to prove inability to pay.

The appellant appealed the municipality's failure to make a decision on his application for property tax relief for the 2016 taxation year.

The appellant sought cancellation or reduction of his taxes, arguing he was unable to pay due to extreme poverty and that the municipality had not legally levied the taxes.

The Assessment Review Board dismissed the appeal, finding that while the appellant provided evidence of his income, he provided no evidence of his expenses.

Consequently, the appellant failed to meet his onus to demonstrate an inability to pay the taxes levied.

M.C. v. City of Sudbury, 2019 CanLII 83963

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardAug 30, 2019

Property assessment reduced to achieve equity with similar properties in the vicinity.

The appellants appealed the 2018 supplementary assessment and 2019 assessment of their residential property following a major renovation.

MPAC recommended a current value of $1,432,000, which the Board accepted as the correct current value based on comparable sales.

However, applying section 44(3)(b) of the Assessment Act, the Board found that a reduction was necessary to make the assessment equitable with similar properties in the vicinity.

The Board reduced the 2019 assessment to $1,291,000 and the 2018 supplementary assessment to $407,000.

Joanna Teresa Powell and Peter Owen Powell v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 81687

Jennifer Boyczuk

19 cases2016–2023

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardAug 27, 2019

Property tax relief application dismissed as applicants demonstrated ability to pay despite sickness and low income.

The applicants applied to the City of Toronto to have their 2018 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded due to sickness or extreme poverty under s. 323(1)(e) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

The Assessment Review Board found that despite the applicants' modest income and significant medical challenges, they had sufficient funds in their bank account after paying the 2018 taxes to demonstrate an ability to pay.

The application was dismissed.

H.S. and V.M. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 81688

Property tax relief application dismissed as applicant failed to demonstrate inability to pay.

The applicant applied to the City of Toronto for a reduction, cancellation, or refund of her 2018 property taxes under s. 323(1)(e) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board, acting under delegated authority, reviewed the applicant's household income and expenses.

The Board found that the applicant's family had sufficient income to meet essential needs and was incurring significant non-essential expenses.

Consequently, the Board concluded the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay the property taxes and dismissed the application.

J.R. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 79847

Jonathan Langille

3 cases2018–2024

Jean-Paul Pilon

OARB0 cases2018–2023

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardAug 8, 2019

Motion to extend schedule of events timelines denied as moving party failed to show exceptional circumstances.

The Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) brought a motion to alter the timelines set out in the schedule of events for property assessment appeals, citing exceptional circumstances.

MPAC argued that a change in the respondent's counsel and the late discovery of equipment requiring a new expert justified the extension.

The Assessment Review Board dismissed the motion, finding that the delay in retaining new counsel was unexplained and the need for a new expert arose from MPAC's failure to conduct a timely inspection.

The Board concluded that no exceptional circumstances existed to warrant an extension of time.

Municipal Property Assessment Corporation v. Cappola Food Inc., 2019 CanLII 75483

Luis Verastegui

6 cases2016–2019

Graham Thomson

Practising Law - Employed24 cases2019–2025

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJul 31, 2019

Property tax relief application dismissed as applicants failed to demonstrate an inability to pay.

The applicants applied to the City of Toronto to have their 2017 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded due to an inability to pay caused by sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board, acting under delegated authority, reviewed the applicants' household income and expenses.

The Board found that the applicants' monthly income exceeded their expenses and that they were meeting their financial obligations, including property taxes.

Consequently, the applicants failed to demonstrate an inability to pay, and the application was dismissed.

M.M. and A.Z. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 72767

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJul 22, 2019

Property assessment reduced to $226,000 based on MPAC's direct comparison approach; appellant's income approach rejected.

The appellant appealed the 2018 and 2019 property assessments of a residential property in North Bay.

MPAC recommended a reduced assessment of $226,000 based on a direct comparison approach, while the appellant argued for a lower value using a relative comparison and gross rent multiplier approach.

The Assessment Review Board accepted MPAC's direct comparison approach as the best evidence of current value, rejecting the appellant's income approach due to a lack of market rent evidence.

The Board set the current value at $226,000 and found no further reduction was warranted for equitable assessment purposes.

Golden Estates Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 70206

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJul 22, 2019

Property assessment reduced to $234,000 based on MPAC's direct comparison approach; appellant's income approach rejected.

The appellant appealed the 2018 and 2019 property assessments of a residential property in North Bay.

MPAC recommended a reduced current value of $234,000 based on the direct comparison approach, while the appellant argued for a value of $162,000 using a relative comparison and gross rent multiplier approach.

The Assessment Review Board rejected the appellant's income approach due to a lack of market rent evidence and preferred MPAC's direct comparison approach.

The Board found the current value to be $234,000 and concluded that no further reduction was necessary for equitable assessment.

Millford Development Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 70201

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJul 18, 2019

Property assessment reduced to $224,000 based on MPAC's direct comparison approach; appellant's income approach rejected.

The appellant appealed the 2018 and 2019 property assessments of a residential property in North Bay.

MPAC recommended a reduced assessment of $224,000 based on the direct comparison approach, while the appellant argued for a value of $162,000 using a relative comparison and gross rent multiplier approach.

The Assessment Review Board rejected the appellant's income approach due to a lack of market rent evidence and preferred MPAC's direct comparison approach.

The Board found the current value to be $224,000 and concluded no further reduction was necessary for equitable assessment.

Millford Development Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 67568

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJun 25, 2019

Property assessment reduced to $392,000 to achieve equity with similar properties in the vicinity.

The appellants appealed the property assessment of their single-family dwelling for the 2017, 2018, and 2019 taxation years.

MPAC had assessed the property at $398,000, $429,000, and $419,000 respectively.

The appellants argued the assessment should be between $375,000 and $385,000.

The Assessment Review Board determined the current value of the property to be $420,000 based on comparable sales.

However, applying section 44(3) of the Assessment Act, the Board found that a reduction was necessary to achieve equitable assessment with similar properties in the vicinity.

The Board reduced the assessment to $392,000 for all three taxation years.

Rennick v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 59506

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJun 14, 2019

Property assessment reduced to $305,000 based on direct comparison approach; equity reduction denied.

The appellant appealed the 2018 and 2019 property assessments of a single-family dwelling in North Bay, arguing for a reduction from $316,000 and $324,000 to approximately $200,000.

The Assessment Review Board rejected the appellant's gross rent multiplier approach because it relied on actual rather than economic rents.

Preferring the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation's direct comparison approach, the Board determined the current value to be $305,000.

The Board further found no compelling evidence to reduce this value for equity purposes, as the assessment-to-sale ratio analysis indicated similar properties in the vicinity were assessed equitably.

The appeals were allowed in part, reducing the assessment to $305,000 for both taxation years.

Millford Development Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 55278

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJun 6, 2019

Property assessment reduced to $203,000 based on direct comparison; appellant's expert witness not qualified.

The appellant appealed the property tax assessment of a single-family dwelling for the 2018 and 2019 taxation years, arguing the value should be reduced from $228,000 to between $152,000 and $160,000.

The Board refused to qualify the appellant's proposed expert witness due to disclosure failures and an ill-defined compensation arrangement.

Relying on the direct comparison approach, the Board accepted MPAC's revised valuation of $203,000.

The Board found no reduction was necessary for equitable assessment purposes, as evidence showed similar properties in the vicinity were assessed at their current values.

Millford Development Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 52942

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMay 24, 2019

Property tax relief application dismissed as household income was adequate to pay the levied taxes.

The applicant applied for a reduction or cancellation of her 2016 property taxes under s. 357(1)(d1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board reviewed the applicant's household income and expenses.

The Board found that the household's 2016 income was adequate to meet basic necessities and pay the annual property taxes.

The application was dismissed.

I.H. v. City of Hamilton, 2019 CanLII 47988

Joanne Laws

OARB0 cases2015–2022

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMay 14, 2019

Farm property assessments reduced after Board applied time-adjusted sales and localized equitable assessment analysis.

The appellants appealed the property tax assessments of six farm properties in the Town of Leamington for the 2018 and 2019 taxation years.

The Assessment Review Board had to determine the current value of each property and whether those values should be reduced for equitable assessment.

The Board determined the current values using a combination of the appellants' time-adjusted sale prices for the subject properties and MPAC's comparable sales approach, depending on the reliability of the sale data for each property.

The Board then found that reductions were necessary for equitable assessment, preferring the appellants' equity analysis based on adjacent similar properties over MPAC's broader regional analysis.

The appeals were allowed and the assessments were reduced.

Driedger v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, Region 27, 2019 CanLII 44232

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardApr 18, 2019

Property assessment reduced for 2018 and 2019 taxation years following equity adjustment and supplementary assessment review.

The appellant appealed the property assessments for the 2017, 2018, and deemed 2019 taxation years for a property located at 6 Cordingley Beach Road.

The Assessment Review Board determined the current value of the property for 2018 and 2019 to be $195,000, but applied an 8% equity reduction, resulting in an assessment of $179,000.

The Board also reduced the supplementary assessment for a detached garage and unfinished allowance from $35,000 to $24,000.

The 2017 assessment was confirmed at $153,000.

Jamie Sofonoff v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 34544

Paul Voorn

5 cases2019–2023

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardApr 18, 2019

Property tax relief application dismissed as household income significantly exceeded reported expenses.

The applicants applied to the Town of Newmarket for a reduction, cancellation, or refund of their 2017 property taxes, claiming an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty under s. 357(7) of the Municipal Act, 2001.

The Assessment Review Board, acting under delegated authority, reviewed the applicants' financial records.

The Board found that the total household income significantly exceeded the reported expenses, indicating that the applicants were able to pay the property taxes.

The application was dismissed.

H.S. and G.S. v. Town of Newmarket, 2019 CanLII 34542

Joanne Laws

OARB0 cases2015–2022

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardApr 5, 2019

Farm property assessments reduced after Board finds Class 2 and 3 soil designation more appropriate.

The appellants appealed the property assessments of three 50-acre farm properties for the 2017, 2018, and deemed 2019 taxation years.

The respondent assessment corporation had assessed the properties as Class 1 farmland.

The appellants argued that the properties should be assessed as Class 2 or 3 farmland due to the presence of Toledo Clay soil, which restricts crop production.

The Assessment Review Board agreed with the appellants, finding that the Class 2 and 3 farmland designation was most appropriate.

The Board determined the current value based on comparable sales and then reduced the assessment for equitable purposes based on the lower assessments of similar properties in the vicinity.

The appeals were allowed and the assessments were reduced.

David Van Segbrook et al. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation et al., 2019 CanLII 29142

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardApr 4, 2019

Property tax relief application dismissed because the applicant possessed sufficient assets to pay the taxes.

The applicant applied to have her 2017 property taxes cancelled or reduced under s. 357(1)(d1) of the Municipal Act, claiming inability to pay due to extreme poverty.

The City of Mississauga delegated the application to the Assessment Review Board.

The Board found that although the applicant's monthly household expenses exceeded her income, she possessed significant assets, including an interest in two other properties and a substantial bank balance.

The Board concluded that a desire to retain assets does not equate to an inability to pay, and dismissed the application.

K.P. v. City of Mississauga, 2019 CanLII 29143

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMar 21, 2019

Property assessment reduced to account for necessary renovations to bring property to comparable standard.

The appellant appealed the property assessment of their residential property for the 2017 and 2018 taxation years, arguing the assessed value of $781,000 was too high due to the property's poor condition.

The Assessment Review Board determined the current value by comparing the property to a similar nearby property and deducting the estimated costs of necessary renovations ($99,000) to bring it to a comparable standard.

The Board reduced the assessment to $718,000 and found no further reduction was required for equitable assessment purposes.

Shahid v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 22922

Page 7 of 13 (252 cases)

assisted the Applicant

A.E.-G.Agent
1 appearance

for 1490804 Ontario Limited and Angie Cormpilas

Angie CormpilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

for 2320480 Ontario Limited

Geoff WattsAgent
1 appearance

for 2440781 Ontario Limited

Akbar BapooAgent
1 appearance

for 3022056 Canada Inc.

Paul GrosmanCounsel
1 appearance

for 409315 Ontario Ltd.

William John BakerAgent
1 appearance

for 440 Elizabeth Street Holding and 440 Elizabeth Street Holdings Ltd.

Andrew AttardAgent
1 appearance
Daniel AttardAgent
1 appearance

for 625041 Ontario Limited

Peter StavrouCounsel
1 appearance

for 8768013 Canada Ltd.

Erin PicklesAgent
2 appearances
Jeff PicklesAgent
2 appearances
Ratha HalfordAgent
1 appearance

for Aipco Inc.

Benjamin FriedSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Amalie Holdings Limited

Paul GrosmanAgent
1 appearance

for Amos Weber and Betsy Hoover Weber

Abram WeberAgent
1 appearance

for Bell Canada

Daniel RosmanCounsel
1 appearance
Richard MinsterCounsel
1 appearance

for Bryfam Enterprises Inc.

Tammy BrysonAgent
1 appearance
Tim BrysonAgent
1 appearance

for Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc.

Mark BlidnerCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Burlington

Paul LacelleAgent
1 appearance
P. LacelleAgent
1 appearance

for City of Greater Sudbury

Dan RosmanCounsel
2 appearances
Richard MinsterCounsel
2 appearances

for City of Hamilton

John O’KaneAgent
2 appearances

for City of London

Brian ShimlaAgent
2 appearances

for City of Niagara Falls

John O’KaneCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Ottawa

Guy TudinoAgent
1 appearance

for City of Thunder Bay

Guy TudinoCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Woodstock (observing only)

Diane CampbellAgent
1 appearance

for CRH Canada Inc.

D. RosmanCounsel
2 appearances
R. MinsterCounsel
2 appearances

for Dennis Abram Driedger, Karen Anne Driedger, and A. Driedger Farms Inc.

Dennis DriedgerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for D. Murray Ventures Inc.

Patrick PrendergastAgent
1 appearance

for EMD Canada Acquisition Co.

Bob PattersonAgent
1 appearance

for Fellowship Wilderness Camp

Stu BurkholderAgent
1 appearance

for Firestone Textiles Company

Drew SamuelsAgent
1 appearance

for Glencore Canada Corporation

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Karina WongCounsel
1 appearance

for Glencore Canada Corporation (formerly Xstrata Canada Corporation)

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Karina WongCounsel
1 appearance

for Greater Toronto Airports Authority

Thomas W. BarlowCounsel
1 appearance

for H.A. and A.S.M.

H.A.Self-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Ken RaySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Host Hospitality Inc.

G. GrewalAgent
1 appearance

for J & S Holdings Inc. and Gary Mayers

Gary MayersSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kamoaks Limited

Thomas ReveszAgent
1 appearance

for Kaprod Holdings Ltd.

P. GrosmanParalegal
1 appearance

for Millford Development Limited

Andrew WinkworthAgent
2 appearances
Mike GuillemetteAgent
2 appearances

for MPAC

William SomervilleAgent
7 appearances
Pierre LefebvreAgent
6 appearances
Justin JohnstoneAgent
6 appearances
Louise St. JeanAgent
5 appearances
Toban EdmundsAgent
5 appearances
Frank SheaCounsel
3 appearances
Ian JohnstoneCounsel
3 appearances
Don MitchellCounsel
3 appearances
Antonietta Romano-BitontiAgent
3 appearances
William SomervilleCounsel
3 appearances
Wayne WilliamsAgent
3 appearances
Tony PileggiAgent
3 appearances
Bonnie MickAgent
2 appearances
Erin ComeauAgent
2 appearances
Jessie YuAgent
2 appearances
John ColeAgent
2 appearances
John TaraborrelliAgent
2 appearances
Corinne Van RaayAgent
2 appearances
Jane Sokol-KennedyAgent
2 appearances
Geoff HigginsonAgent
2 appearances

for Municipality of Brockton

Trish BagloleAgent
1 appearance

for Municipal Property Assessment Corporation

Sarah CormanCounsel
2 appearances
Hilary BrownCounsel
2 appearances
Melissa VanBerkumCounsel
2 appearances
Michael RadanAgent
2 appearances
Leo ChapdelaineAgent
1 appearance
Loris FataAgent
1 appearance
Michael RadanCounsel
1 appearance
Adam ParkerAgent
1 appearance
Carrie CaroneCounsel
1 appearance
Damian BernacikAgent
1 appearance
Francis X. SheaCounsel
1 appearance
George KaldenbachAgent
1 appearance

for North American Railway Hall of Fame

Larry LongfieldAgent
2 appearances
Paul SmithAgent
2 appearances
Matt JanesAgent
2 appearances

for Nuance Group Canada Inc., The Nuance Group Canada Inc., and Nuance Global Traders Inc.

Peter A. MilliganCounsel
1 appearance
James G. WalkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Parkyards Inc.

Lukas KwiatkowskiAgent
1 appearance

for Rutherford Properties Ltd.

Chandelle HamiltonAgent
1 appearance
Colin FrancisAgent
1 appearance

for Sota Holdings Ltd.

Dorota MarshallAgent
2 appearances

for Stelco Inc.

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren LackieCounsel
1 appearance

for Stephanie Bowman and David Farwell

Surin ToorAgent
1 appearance

for St. Mary’s Cement Inc. (Canada); Capital Paving Inc; Preston Sand and Gravel Company; 2416854 Ontario Inc.

J. CowanCounsel
2 appearances

for Syed Raza and Sadia Raza

Marc KemererCounsel
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Robert BaranowskiAgent
6 appearances
Surin ToorAgent
3 appearances
Andrew WinkworthAgent
3 appearances
Mike GuillemetteAgent
3 appearances
Gurjit S. GrewalSelf-represented
2 appearances
Andrew AttardAgent
2 appearances
Peter TamAgent
2 appearances
Alan Benjamin YoungSelf-represented
1 appearance
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance
Allan HolmesAgent
1 appearance
A.M.C.Self-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PetersenAgent
1 appearance
Arwa MhawiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bernard CassarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brendan ChartersAgent
1 appearance
Charles DobuckiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cindy AsselstineSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eugene SawchukAgent
1 appearance
F. R.Self-represented
1 appearance
Garth AllenAgent
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Harry BattuSelf-represented
2 appearances
James CraneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dawn Marie GriffithSelf-represented
2 appearances
Steven Scott GriffithSelf-represented
2 appearances
Bernarda KrasowskiSelf-represented
2 appearances
Arnold AugspolsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Craig LaneSelf-represented
1 appearance
David Van SegbrookSelf-represented
1 appearance
Debbie-Jane Prada-SheaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dianne Elizabeth MillarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald RennickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Earnest LightSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward SheaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Elizabeth DeMerchantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eugene Stewart DoreySelf-represented
1 appearance
Fritz NussbergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gary CaseSelf-represented
1 appearance
George ParazaderSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn McNeilSelf-represented
1 appearance
James Edward CraneSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

J.K.Self-represented
2 appearances
P.B.Agent
2 appearances
P.S.Self-represented
2 appearances
R.A.Self-represented
2 appearances
C.A.Agent
1 appearance
D. D.Self-represented
1 appearance
D.N.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.C.Agent
1 appearance
G.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
G.C.Agent
1 appearance
G.E.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
G. H.Self-represented
1 appearance
I.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.E.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.O.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.P.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
K.P.Self-represented
1 appearance
K.S.Agent
1 appearance

for the Applicants

N.P.R.Self-represented
2 appearances
V.R.Self-represented
2 appearances
J.G.Self-represented
2 appearances
I.R-B.Self-represented
1 appearance
I.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.Y. and M.Y.Self-represented
1 appearance
L.G.Self-represented
1 appearance
M.I.Self-represented
1 appearance
M.N.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.C.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
O.I.Self-represented
1 appearance
P.S.Agent
1 appearance
R.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
R.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
R.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
U.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
V.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
Y.S.K.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Assessed

Eli MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Assessed Person

Erin PicklesAgent
1 appearance
Jeff PicklesAgent
1 appearance
Ratha HalfordAgent
1 appearance

for the Assessed Persons

Isaak Penner DoerksenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manassah Martin DoerksenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the City of Brampton

Aida KarremanAgent
4 appearances

for the City of Burlington

Paul LacelleAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Cambridge

David HotsonAgent
2 appearances
Kendra SchollAgent
2 appearances
Shawn McConkeyAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Hamilton

Linda NimakoAgent
4 appearances
Irwin SampatAgent
3 appearances
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance
John O’KaneCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kitchener

Paul YeomanAgent
1 appearance

for the City of London

Brian ShimlaAgent
2 appearances
Geoff BelchCounsel
1 appearance
James EdmundsAgent
1 appearance

for the City of London and Brian Shimla

Geoff BelchCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Mississauga

Sean DoyleAgent
8 appearances
Sean DoyleCounsel
2 appearances
Barb MaltaAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Niagara Falls

Stephanie YoungAgent
1 appearance
Amber FergusonAgent
1 appearance
Anthony ScaringiAgent
1 appearance
Miranda AdamsonAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Thunder Bay

Vince DesandoAgent
3 appearances

for the City of Toronto

Graham ThomsonCounsel
5 appearances
Luis VerasteguiCounsel
4 appearances
J. BoyczukCounsel
3 appearances
Georgia KarakolisAgent
1 appearance
Graham ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance
Graham ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Jared WherleCounsel
1 appearance
Jennifer BoyczukCounsel
1 appearance
Laura NymanCounsel
1 appearance
Luis VerasteguiAgent
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarCounsel
1 appearance
Alison MintoffCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarAgent
1 appearance
Amy TieuCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Windsor

Janice GuthrieAgent
1 appearance
Jose MejalliAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Dorothy GibbonsAgent
1 appearance
Joel FarberCounsel
1 appearance

for The Corporation of the City of Mississauga

Brad TeichmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the County of Lambton and City of Sarnia

Donald DaviesAgent
1 appearance
Gaetano TudinoAgent
1 appearance

for the County of Wellington

C. KuehlCounsel
2 appearances
R. ShoomCounsel
2 appearances

for the Estate of Peter Dyriw and Roman Dyriw

Roman DyriwSelf-represented
1 appearance

for themselves

Damian Anthony SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michelle Lynne SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Municipality

Dennis DoyleAgent
1 appearance
William DakinAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Greenstone

Jack KuzminskiAgent
1 appearance
Lorne ChristensonAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Huron Shores

Deborah TonelliAgent
2 appearances

for the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation

Tim OberleAgent
4 appearances
Jessie YuAgent
2 appearances
D. MitchellCounsel
2 appearances
J. BarlowCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie DeWinterAgent
2 appearances
Michael RadanAgent
2 appearances
Sheryl McRobertsAgent
2 appearances
Terence JohnstonAgent
2 appearances
Damian BernacikAgent
1 appearance
Amanda GordonAgent
1 appearance
Donald MitchellCounsel
1 appearance
Evan MendelAgent
1 appearance
Helene BlackburnAgent
1 appearance
Jacqui IrwinAgent
1 appearance
Tanya Janeczek-BoyleAgent
1 appearance
Amber WalshAgent
1 appearance
John HyattAgent
1 appearance
Kalin DoucetAgent
1 appearance
Karen BallAgent
1 appearance
Tara JonesAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Sean DoyleAgent
12 appearances
Sean DoyleCounsel
6 appearances
Jennifer BoyczukCounsel
3 appearances
Laura NymanCounsel
2 appearances
Melanie ShankarAgent
2 appearances
Georgia TannerCounsel
1 appearance
Graham ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance
Irwin SampatAgent
1 appearance
James EdmundsAgent
1 appearance
Jennifer ErringtonAgent
1 appearance
Justin JohnstoneAgent
1 appearance
Linda LiottiAgent
1 appearance
Linda NimakoAgent
1 appearance
Luis VerasteguiCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarCounsel
1 appearance
Paul HettingaCounsel
1 appearance
Sue StraughanAgent
1 appearance
Y. KwiecienAgent
1 appearance
A. KarremanAgent
1 appearance
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Halton Hills

Elizabeth van RavensAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Newmarket

Dora WohlsteinAgent
1 appearance
Grace MarshAgent
1 appearance
Paul VoornCounsel
1 appearance
Selene AliAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Oakville

Susan PriceAgent
5 appearances

for the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville

Tracy ParsonsAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Johnson

Herman KlingenbergAgent
5 appearances

for the Township of King

Alice LiuAgent
1 appearance
Karen WoottonAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Laird

Jennifer ErringtonAgent
2 appearances

for the Township of Zorra

Kelly HallAgent
1 appearance

for Timberland Equipment Limited

Paul J. SmithAgent
3 appearances
Loryn LuxAgent
2 appearances

for Town of Halton Hills

Elizabeth van RavensAgent
1 appearance

for Town of Leamington

Laura RauchAgent
2 appearances
Ginny CampbellAgent
1 appearance
Delores JefferyAgent
1 appearance

for Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville

Tracy ParsonsAgent
1 appearance

for T Valeri Construction Limited

Paul GrosmanAgent
2 appearances

for Vale Canada Limited

Belinda SchubertCounsel
2 appearances
Philip SanfordCounsel
2 appearances

for Werh Group Inc.

Bonnie PetroAgent
1 appearance

for Z.C.

E.C.Agent
1 appearance

Self-represented

P.H.Self-represented
1 appearance

252

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

2.0

cases/mo

OARB252(100%)

Decision types

appeal

202

trial

motion

Page 7 of 13 (252 cases)

Dan Weagant

D. D. v. City of Hamilton, 2019 CanLII 86388

Dan Weagant

M.C. v. City of Sudbury, 2019 CanLII 83963

Dan Weagant

Joanna Teresa Powell and Peter Owen Powell v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 81687

Jennifer Boyczuk

Dan Weagant

H.S. and V.M. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 81688

Melanie Shankar

Graham Thomson

Dan Weagant

J.R. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 79847

Jonathan Langille

Jean-Paul Pilon

Dan Weagant

Municipal Property Assessment Corporation v. Cappola Food Inc., 2019 CanLII 75483

Luis Verastegui

Graham Thomson

Dan Weagant

M.M. and A.Z. v. City of Toronto, 2019 CanLII 72767

Dan Weagant

Golden Estates Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 70206

Dan Weagant

Millford Development Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 70201

Dan Weagant

Millford Development Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 67568

Dan Weagant

Rennick v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 59506

Dan Weagant

Millford Development Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 55278

Dan Weagant

Millford Development Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 52942

Dan Weagant

I.H. v. City of Hamilton, 2019 CanLII 47988

Joanne Laws

Dan Weagant

Driedger v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, Region 27, 2019 CanLII 44232

Dan Weagant

Jamie Sofonoff v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 34544

Paul Voorn

Dan Weagant

H.S. and G.S. v. Town of Newmarket, 2019 CanLII 34542

Joanne Laws

Dan Weagant

David Van Segbrook et al. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation et al., 2019 CanLII 29142

Dan Weagant

K.P. v. City of Mississauga, 2019 CanLII 29143

Dan Weagant

Shahid v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 2019 CanLII 22922

assisted the Applicant

for 1490804 Ontario Limited and Angie Cormpilas

for 2320480 Ontario Limited

for 2440781 Ontario Limited

for 3022056 Canada Inc.

for 409315 Ontario Ltd.

for 440 Elizabeth Street Holding and 440 Elizabeth Street Holdings Ltd.

for 625041 Ontario Limited

for 8768013 Canada Ltd.

for Aipco Inc.

for Amalie Holdings Limited

for Amos Weber and Betsy Hoover Weber

for Bell Canada

for Bryfam Enterprises Inc.

for Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc.

for City of Burlington

for City of Greater Sudbury

for City of Hamilton

for City of London

for City of Niagara Falls

for City of Ottawa

for City of Thunder Bay

for City of Woodstock (observing only)

for CRH Canada Inc.

for Dennis Abram Driedger, Karen Anne Driedger, and A. Driedger Farms Inc.

for D. Murray Ventures Inc.

for EMD Canada Acquisition Co.

for Fellowship Wilderness Camp

for Firestone Textiles Company

for Glencore Canada Corporation