Dan Weagant is a member at the Assessment Review Board with 252 decisions on record from 2015 to 2025. Key areas include property tax assessment, administrative law, other tribunals.

What tribunal does Dan Weagant sit on?

Dan Weagant sits on the Assessment Review Board.

What areas of law does Dan Weagant decide?

Dan Weagant's most common areas include Property Tax Assessment (252 decisions), Administrative Law (42 decisions), Other Tribunals (7 decisions). Dan Weagant has handled 252 decisions across 3 areas.

How many decisions has Dan Weagant made?

Dan Weagant has 252 decisions on record from 2015 to 2025.

Who frequently appears before Dan Weagant?

Representatives who frequently appear before Dan Weagant include Sean Doyle, Sean Doyle, William Somerville.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Dan Weagant — Member

Property Tax Assessment

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Dan Weagant

Member·Assessment Review Board·Since 2015

252

cases · 11 yrs · OARB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Member· 209Member· 27Member· 11MEMBER· 3MEMBER· 1MEMBER· 1

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMar 19, 2021

Property assessment reduced to $548,000 to ensure equity with a highly similar neighbouring property.

The appellant appealed the 2020 property assessment of her single-family dwelling, a 'bungaloft', which was assessed at $551,000.

The Assessment Review Board found the current value of the property to be $620,000 based on its time-adjusted 2015 sale price.

However, applying the principle of equitable assessment, the Board reduced the assessment to $548,000 to match the assessment of a nearly identical property located directly across the street.

Marion Seidler v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 13, 2021 CanLII 22017

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMar 10, 2021

Property tax relief application dismissed as the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay.

The Applicant applied to the City of Mississauga for a reduction, cancellation, or refund of her 2019 property taxes under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The City delegated the application to the Assessment Review Board.

The Board found that the Applicant had sufficient assets, including approximately $69,000 in a bank account, and had already paid the 2019 property taxes.

The Board concluded the Applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay and dismissed the application.

A.C. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 15, 2021 CanLII 19611

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMar 10, 2021

Property tax relief application dismissed as applicant failed to demonstrate inability to pay.

The applicant applied to the City of Hamilton for a reduction, cancellation, or refund of her 2019 property taxes under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The City delegated the determination to the Assessment Review Board.

The Board found that the applicant's monthly income exceeded her monthly expenses and that she had successfully paid her 2019 property taxes, including arrears from 2018.

Consequently, the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay, and the application was dismissed.

N.H. v. City of Hamilton, 2021 CanLII 19613

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardFeb 11, 2021

Waterfront property assessment reduced to $556,000 based on comparable sales.

The appellant appealed the current value assessment of a seasonal waterfront property on Jack Lake for the 2017-2020 taxation years.

The Municipal Property Assessment Corporation had returned a value of $600,000.

The Assessment Review Board evaluated the comparable properties presented by both parties, rejecting those with significant disparities in living area.

Based on the two most comparable properties, the Board determined the correct current value to be $556,000 and found no evidence to support a further reduction for equitable assessment.

Jack Nunno v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 07, 2021 CanLII 10162

Graham Thomson

Practising Law - Employed24 cases2019–2025

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardDec 23, 2020

Application for property tax relief dismissed as applicant failed to demonstrate inability to pay.

The applicant applied to the City of Toronto to have her 2019 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded due to an inability to pay caused by sickness or extreme poverty under s. 323(1)(e) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

The Assessment Review Board found that the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay her property taxes, noting that she was able to pay her taxes as part of her regular mortgage payments while meeting household necessities and incurring discretionary costs.

The application was dismissed.

R.E. v. City of Toronto, 2020 CanLII 103479

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardDec 18, 2020

Property assessment reduced to $1,338,000 to ensure equity with similar renovated properties in the vicinity.

The appellants appealed the 2020 property assessment of their renovated single-family home in Toronto, which MPAC had assessed at $1,507,000.

The Board first determined the current value of the property to be $1,527,000 based on MPAC's time-adjusted sales analysis of comparable properties.

However, upon conducting an equity analysis comparing the subject property to five similarly renovated properties in the vicinity, the Board found that a reduction was necessary to achieve equitable assessment.

The Board ordered the assessment reduced to $1,338,000.

Linda Ann Boyle and Robert Peter Bernstein v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 09 and City of Toronto, 2020 CanLII 103263

J. Boyczuk

8 cases2017–2024

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardDec 8, 2020

Property tax application dismissed due to applicant's failure to attend pre-hearing event.

The applicant filed an application to have its 2019 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded due to sickness or extreme poverty.

A pre-hearing event was scheduled, but the applicant failed to attend.

The Assessment Review Board found no evidence of exceptional circumstances to justify an adjournment and dismissed the application for non-attendance pursuant to Rule 104 of its Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Canada Corp. v. City of Toronto, 2020 CanLII 99838

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardNov 5, 2020

Property taxes reduced due to applicant's inability to pay caused by family sickness and disability.

The applicant applied to the City of Hamilton for a reduction or cancellation of her 2019 property taxes under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board, acting under delegated authority, reviewed the family's income, which consisted primarily of disability support payments, and their necessary expenses, including the costs of caring for an adult son with severe behavioral issues.

The Board found that the applicant was unable to pay the full tax amount due to sickness and ordered the 2019 property taxes reduced from $5,272.29 to $2,326.

Z.C. v. City of Hamilton, 2020 CanLII 87161

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardOct 30, 2020

Property tax relief application dismissed as financial evidence demonstrated the applicant's ability to pay.

The applicant applied to the City of Mississauga for a cancellation, reduction, or refund of his 2019 property taxes under s. 357(1)(d1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, claiming an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The City delegated the determination to the Assessment Review Board.

The Board found that the applicant's financial evidence, which showed a positive bank balance at the end of the year after all expenses including property taxes were paid, demonstrated an ability to pay.

The application was dismissed.

D.N. v. City of Mississauga, 2020 CanLII 83828

Graham Thomson

Practising Law - Employed24 cases2019–2025

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardOct 27, 2020

Property tax relief application dismissed as the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay.

The applicant applied to have her 2019 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded under s. 323(1)(e) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board reviewed the applicant's income, expenses, and assets, noting that she had approximately $665,000 in equity in her home and had successfully paid her 2019 property taxes in full while maintaining a small bank account surplus.

The Board found that the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay the taxes levied in 2019 and dismissed the application.

S.C. v. City of Toronto, 2020 CanLII 83825

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardOct 22, 2020

Property taxes cancelled and refunded after applicant demonstrated inability to pay due to extreme poverty.

The applicant applied to the City of Kawartha Lakes to have her 2019 property taxes reduced, cancelled, or refunded due to an inability to pay caused by extreme poverty.

The City delegated the determination to the Assessment Review Board.

The Board found that the applicant's monthly expenses exceeded her income, which consisted primarily of disability support payments, and that she was living in extreme poverty.

The Board ordered the cancellation of $765 in outstanding 2019 taxes and a refund of $876 for taxes already paid.

J.E. v. City of Kawartha Lakes, 2020 CanLII 80893

Geoff Belch

3 cases2015–2020

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardOct 20, 2020

Property assessment appeals dismissed due to appellants' failure to comply with the Board's Schedule of Events.

The City of London brought a motion to dismiss the appellants' property assessment appeals for the 2018, 2019, and 2020 taxation years due to their failure to comply with the Board's Schedule of Events.

The appellants had not exchanged documents by the required deadline, citing unfamiliarity with the new process and lack of time due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Assessment Review Board granted the motion, finding that the appellants were responsible for taking the necessary steps to advance their appeals and had failed to do so.

The appeals were dismissed.

Damian Anthony Smith and Michelle Lynne Smith v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 23 and City of London, 2020 CanLII 80890

Graham Thompson

1 case2020–2020

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardOct 15, 2020

Application for property tax relief dismissed as applicants failed to demonstrate inability to pay.

The applicants applied to the City of Toronto to have their 2019 property taxes reduced, cancelled, or refunded under s. 323(1)(e) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The City delegated the application to the Assessment Review Board.

The Board reviewed the applicants' financial documents, which showed their average monthly income exceeded their monthly expenses, leaving a positive bank balance.

The Board found the applicants failed to demonstrate an inability to pay the property taxes levied in 2019 and dismissed the application.

O.I. and Y.S. v. City of Toronto, 2020 CanLII 77935

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardSep 11, 2020

Commercial property assessment reduced to $688,000 due to poor building condition and depreciated on-site services.

The appellants appealed the property assessment of a commercial property for the 2017-2020 taxation years, arguing the value should be reduced due to the poor condition of the building and substandard drainage.

MPAC used the cost approach, applying a 58% depreciation rate to the building.

The Assessment Review Board found the current value of the property to be $688,000, adjusting MPAC's valuation to account for the depreciated value of on-site water and septic services.

No equity reduction was applied.

Aipco Inc. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 14, 2020 CanLII 66082

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJul 30, 2020

Commercial property assessment reduced to $688,000 after applying 58% depreciation to building and on-site utilities.

The appellants appealed the property assessment of a commercial property for the 2017 to 2020 taxation years, arguing the value should be reduced due to the poor condition of the building and substandard drainage.

MPAC used the cost approach, applying a 58% depreciation rate to the building due to its condition, and recommended a value of $717,000.

The Assessment Review Board adjusted the land value based on comparable sales and applied the 58% depreciation rate to the on-site utilities (septic and water well).

The Board determined the current value of the property to be $688,000 and found no evidence to support a further reduction for equitable assessment.

Aipco Inc. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 14, 2020 CanLII 52482

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJul 21, 2020

Property assessment reduced to $1,049,000 to reflect equitable assessment compared to similar nearby properties.

The appellant appealed the 2019 and 2020 property assessments for a 50-acre property comprising residential, managed forest, and conservation lands.

The Assessment Review Board determined the current value of the property to be $1,605,000 based on comparable sales.

However, applying the principle of equitable assessment, the Board reduced the assessment to $1,049,000 after comparing the property to similar nearby properties with multiple property classes.

Alan Benjamin Young v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 15, 2020 CanLII 50041

Sean Doyle

25 cases2015–2026

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJun 23, 2020

Application dismissed due to the applicant's failure to attend the peremptory hearing.

The applicant failed to attend a peremptory hearing scheduled by telephone conference call.

The respondent municipality brought an oral motion to dismiss the application for non-attendance.

The Assessment Review Board noted that the applicant's representative was aware of the hearing date and time, and no reasons were provided for the absence.

Pursuant to Rule 104 of the Board's Rules of Practice and Procedure, the Board granted the motion and dismissed the application.

B.B. v. City of Mississauga, 2020 CanLII 42842

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMay 20, 2020

Property assessment reduced to $1,325,000 using market rents rather than actual rents under the income approach.

The appellants appealed the property assessment of a two-storey office building for the 2017-2020 taxation years, arguing the value was too high because it was based on market rents rather than the property's actual rents.

The Assessment Review Board held that, under the income approach to value, market rents must be used rather than actual rents.

Applying a market rent of $10.50 per square foot derived from comparable leases in effect on the valuation day, the Board reduced the assessment from $1,523,000 to $1,325,000.

700720 Ontario Inc. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 05, 2020 CanLII 35836

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMay 20, 2020

Property assessment reduced to $640,000 based on unadjusted comparable sales and actual purchase price.

The appellant appealed the 2019 and 2020 property assessments of her single-family dwelling, which MPAC had assessed at $679,000.

Both parties used the direct comparison approach but disagreed on time adjustment factors and locational adjustments.

The Assessment Review Board rejected both parties' time adjustment factors due to lack of reliable evidence and relied on the unadjusted sale prices of comparable properties, including the subject property's actual 2014 purchase price of $640,000.

The Board reduced the assessment to $640,000 and found no compelling evidence to warrant a further reduction for equitable assessment purposes.

Kisenko v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 19, 2020 CanLII 35837

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardApr 2, 2020

Property tax relief application dismissed as applicant failed to demonstrate inability to pay.

The applicant applied to the municipality to have her 2018 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded under section 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board found that the applicant's income and bank balances demonstrated an ability to pay the taxes, which had already been paid in full.

The application was dismissed.

A.M. v. City of Mississauga, 2020 CanLII 26214

Page 5 of 13 (252 cases)

assisted the Applicant

A.E.-G.Agent
1 appearance

for 1490804 Ontario Limited and Angie Cormpilas

Angie CormpilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

for 2320480 Ontario Limited

Geoff WattsAgent
1 appearance

for 2440781 Ontario Limited

Akbar BapooAgent
1 appearance

for 3022056 Canada Inc.

Paul GrosmanCounsel
1 appearance

for 409315 Ontario Ltd.

William John BakerAgent
1 appearance

for 440 Elizabeth Street Holding and 440 Elizabeth Street Holdings Ltd.

Andrew AttardAgent
1 appearance
Daniel AttardAgent
1 appearance

for 625041 Ontario Limited

Peter StavrouCounsel
1 appearance

for 8768013 Canada Ltd.

Erin PicklesAgent
2 appearances
Jeff PicklesAgent
2 appearances
Ratha HalfordAgent
1 appearance

for Aipco Inc.

Benjamin FriedSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Amalie Holdings Limited

Paul GrosmanAgent
1 appearance

for Amos Weber and Betsy Hoover Weber

Abram WeberAgent
1 appearance

for Bell Canada

Daniel RosmanCounsel
1 appearance
Richard MinsterCounsel
1 appearance

for Bryfam Enterprises Inc.

Tammy BrysonAgent
1 appearance
Tim BrysonAgent
1 appearance

for Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc.

Mark BlidnerCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Burlington

Paul LacelleAgent
1 appearance
P. LacelleAgent
1 appearance

for City of Greater Sudbury

Dan RosmanCounsel
2 appearances
Richard MinsterCounsel
2 appearances

for City of Hamilton

John O’KaneAgent
2 appearances

for City of London

Brian ShimlaAgent
2 appearances

for City of Niagara Falls

John O’KaneCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Ottawa

Guy TudinoAgent
1 appearance

for City of Thunder Bay

Guy TudinoCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Woodstock (observing only)

Diane CampbellAgent
1 appearance

for CRH Canada Inc.

D. RosmanCounsel
2 appearances
R. MinsterCounsel
2 appearances

for Dennis Abram Driedger, Karen Anne Driedger, and A. Driedger Farms Inc.

Dennis DriedgerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for D. Murray Ventures Inc.

Patrick PrendergastAgent
1 appearance

for EMD Canada Acquisition Co.

Bob PattersonAgent
1 appearance

for Fellowship Wilderness Camp

Stu BurkholderAgent
1 appearance

for Firestone Textiles Company

Drew SamuelsAgent
1 appearance

for Glencore Canada Corporation

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Karina WongCounsel
1 appearance

for Glencore Canada Corporation (formerly Xstrata Canada Corporation)

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Karina WongCounsel
1 appearance

for Greater Toronto Airports Authority

Thomas W. BarlowCounsel
1 appearance

for H.A. and A.S.M.

H.A.Self-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Ken RaySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Host Hospitality Inc.

G. GrewalAgent
1 appearance

for J & S Holdings Inc. and Gary Mayers

Gary MayersSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kamoaks Limited

Thomas ReveszAgent
1 appearance

for Kaprod Holdings Ltd.

P. GrosmanParalegal
1 appearance

for Millford Development Limited

Andrew WinkworthAgent
2 appearances
Mike GuillemetteAgent
2 appearances

for MPAC

William SomervilleAgent
7 appearances
Pierre LefebvreAgent
6 appearances
Justin JohnstoneAgent
6 appearances
Louise St. JeanAgent
5 appearances
Toban EdmundsAgent
5 appearances
Frank SheaCounsel
3 appearances
Ian JohnstoneCounsel
3 appearances
Don MitchellCounsel
3 appearances
Antonietta Romano-BitontiAgent
3 appearances
William SomervilleCounsel
3 appearances
Wayne WilliamsAgent
3 appearances
Tony PileggiAgent
3 appearances
Bonnie MickAgent
2 appearances
Erin ComeauAgent
2 appearances
Jessie YuAgent
2 appearances
John ColeAgent
2 appearances
John TaraborrelliAgent
2 appearances
Corinne Van RaayAgent
2 appearances
Jane Sokol-KennedyAgent
2 appearances
Geoff HigginsonAgent
2 appearances

for Municipality of Brockton

Trish BagloleAgent
1 appearance

for Municipal Property Assessment Corporation

Sarah CormanCounsel
2 appearances
Hilary BrownCounsel
2 appearances
Melissa VanBerkumCounsel
2 appearances
Michael RadanAgent
2 appearances
Leo ChapdelaineAgent
1 appearance
Loris FataAgent
1 appearance
Michael RadanCounsel
1 appearance
Adam ParkerAgent
1 appearance
Carrie CaroneCounsel
1 appearance
Damian BernacikAgent
1 appearance
Francis X. SheaCounsel
1 appearance
George KaldenbachAgent
1 appearance

for North American Railway Hall of Fame

Larry LongfieldAgent
2 appearances
Paul SmithAgent
2 appearances
Matt JanesAgent
2 appearances

for Nuance Group Canada Inc., The Nuance Group Canada Inc., and Nuance Global Traders Inc.

Peter A. MilliganCounsel
1 appearance
James G. WalkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Parkyards Inc.

Lukas KwiatkowskiAgent
1 appearance

for Rutherford Properties Ltd.

Chandelle HamiltonAgent
1 appearance
Colin FrancisAgent
1 appearance

for Sota Holdings Ltd.

Dorota MarshallAgent
2 appearances

for Stelco Inc.

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren LackieCounsel
1 appearance

for Stephanie Bowman and David Farwell

Surin ToorAgent
1 appearance

for St. Mary’s Cement Inc. (Canada); Capital Paving Inc; Preston Sand and Gravel Company; 2416854 Ontario Inc.

J. CowanCounsel
2 appearances

for Syed Raza and Sadia Raza

Marc KemererCounsel
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Robert BaranowskiAgent
6 appearances
Surin ToorAgent
3 appearances
Andrew WinkworthAgent
3 appearances
Mike GuillemetteAgent
3 appearances
Gurjit S. GrewalSelf-represented
2 appearances
Andrew AttardAgent
2 appearances
Peter TamAgent
2 appearances
Alan Benjamin YoungSelf-represented
1 appearance
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance
Allan HolmesAgent
1 appearance
A.M.C.Self-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PetersenAgent
1 appearance
Arwa MhawiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bernard CassarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brendan ChartersAgent
1 appearance
Charles DobuckiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cindy AsselstineSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eugene SawchukAgent
1 appearance
F. R.Self-represented
1 appearance
Garth AllenAgent
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Harry BattuSelf-represented
2 appearances
James CraneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dawn Marie GriffithSelf-represented
2 appearances
Steven Scott GriffithSelf-represented
2 appearances
Bernarda KrasowskiSelf-represented
2 appearances
Arnold AugspolsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Craig LaneSelf-represented
1 appearance
David Van SegbrookSelf-represented
1 appearance
Debbie-Jane Prada-SheaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dianne Elizabeth MillarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald RennickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Earnest LightSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward SheaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Elizabeth DeMerchantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eugene Stewart DoreySelf-represented
1 appearance
Fritz NussbergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gary CaseSelf-represented
1 appearance
George ParazaderSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn McNeilSelf-represented
1 appearance
James Edward CraneSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

J.K.Self-represented
2 appearances
P.B.Agent
2 appearances
P.S.Self-represented
2 appearances
R.A.Self-represented
2 appearances
C.A.Agent
1 appearance
D. D.Self-represented
1 appearance
D.N.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.C.Agent
1 appearance
G.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
G.C.Agent
1 appearance
G.E.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
G. H.Self-represented
1 appearance
I.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.E.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.O.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.P.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
K.P.Self-represented
1 appearance
K.S.Agent
1 appearance

for the Applicants

N.P.R.Self-represented
2 appearances
V.R.Self-represented
2 appearances
J.G.Self-represented
2 appearances
I.R-B.Self-represented
1 appearance
I.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.Y. and M.Y.Self-represented
1 appearance
L.G.Self-represented
1 appearance
M.I.Self-represented
1 appearance
M.N.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.C.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
O.I.Self-represented
1 appearance
P.S.Agent
1 appearance
R.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
R.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
R.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
U.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
V.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
Y.S.K.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Assessed

Eli MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Assessed Person

Erin PicklesAgent
1 appearance
Jeff PicklesAgent
1 appearance
Ratha HalfordAgent
1 appearance

for the Assessed Persons

Isaak Penner DoerksenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manassah Martin DoerksenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the City of Brampton

Aida KarremanAgent
4 appearances

for the City of Burlington

Paul LacelleAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Cambridge

David HotsonAgent
2 appearances
Kendra SchollAgent
2 appearances
Shawn McConkeyAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Hamilton

Linda NimakoAgent
4 appearances
Irwin SampatAgent
3 appearances
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance
John O’KaneCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kitchener

Paul YeomanAgent
1 appearance

for the City of London

Brian ShimlaAgent
2 appearances
Geoff BelchCounsel
1 appearance
James EdmundsAgent
1 appearance

for the City of London and Brian Shimla

Geoff BelchCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Mississauga

Sean DoyleAgent
8 appearances
Sean DoyleCounsel
2 appearances
Barb MaltaAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Niagara Falls

Stephanie YoungAgent
1 appearance
Amber FergusonAgent
1 appearance
Anthony ScaringiAgent
1 appearance
Miranda AdamsonAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Thunder Bay

Vince DesandoAgent
3 appearances

for the City of Toronto

Graham ThomsonCounsel
5 appearances
Luis VerasteguiCounsel
4 appearances
J. BoyczukCounsel
3 appearances
Georgia KarakolisAgent
1 appearance
Graham ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance
Graham ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Jared WherleCounsel
1 appearance
Jennifer BoyczukCounsel
1 appearance
Laura NymanCounsel
1 appearance
Luis VerasteguiAgent
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarCounsel
1 appearance
Alison MintoffCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarAgent
1 appearance
Amy TieuCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Windsor

Janice GuthrieAgent
1 appearance
Jose MejalliAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Dorothy GibbonsAgent
1 appearance
Joel FarberCounsel
1 appearance

for The Corporation of the City of Mississauga

Brad TeichmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the County of Lambton and City of Sarnia

Donald DaviesAgent
1 appearance
Gaetano TudinoAgent
1 appearance

for the County of Wellington

C. KuehlCounsel
2 appearances
R. ShoomCounsel
2 appearances

for the Estate of Peter Dyriw and Roman Dyriw

Roman DyriwSelf-represented
1 appearance

for themselves

Damian Anthony SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michelle Lynne SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Municipality

Dennis DoyleAgent
1 appearance
William DakinAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Greenstone

Jack KuzminskiAgent
1 appearance
Lorne ChristensonAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Huron Shores

Deborah TonelliAgent
2 appearances

for the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation

Tim OberleAgent
4 appearances
Jessie YuAgent
2 appearances
D. MitchellCounsel
2 appearances
J. BarlowCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie DeWinterAgent
2 appearances
Michael RadanAgent
2 appearances
Sheryl McRobertsAgent
2 appearances
Terence JohnstonAgent
2 appearances
Damian BernacikAgent
1 appearance
Amanda GordonAgent
1 appearance
Donald MitchellCounsel
1 appearance
Evan MendelAgent
1 appearance
Helene BlackburnAgent
1 appearance
Jacqui IrwinAgent
1 appearance
Tanya Janeczek-BoyleAgent
1 appearance
Amber WalshAgent
1 appearance
John HyattAgent
1 appearance
Kalin DoucetAgent
1 appearance
Karen BallAgent
1 appearance
Tara JonesAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Sean DoyleAgent
12 appearances
Sean DoyleCounsel
6 appearances
Jennifer BoyczukCounsel
3 appearances
Laura NymanCounsel
2 appearances
Melanie ShankarAgent
2 appearances
Georgia TannerCounsel
1 appearance
Graham ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance
Irwin SampatAgent
1 appearance
James EdmundsAgent
1 appearance
Jennifer ErringtonAgent
1 appearance
Justin JohnstoneAgent
1 appearance
Linda LiottiAgent
1 appearance
Linda NimakoAgent
1 appearance
Luis VerasteguiCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarCounsel
1 appearance
Paul HettingaCounsel
1 appearance
Sue StraughanAgent
1 appearance
Y. KwiecienAgent
1 appearance
A. KarremanAgent
1 appearance
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Halton Hills

Elizabeth van RavensAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Newmarket

Dora WohlsteinAgent
1 appearance
Grace MarshAgent
1 appearance
Paul VoornCounsel
1 appearance
Selene AliAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Oakville

Susan PriceAgent
5 appearances

for the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville

Tracy ParsonsAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Johnson

Herman KlingenbergAgent
5 appearances

for the Township of King

Alice LiuAgent
1 appearance
Karen WoottonAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Laird

Jennifer ErringtonAgent
2 appearances

for the Township of Zorra

Kelly HallAgent
1 appearance

for Timberland Equipment Limited

Paul J. SmithAgent
3 appearances
Loryn LuxAgent
2 appearances

for Town of Halton Hills

Elizabeth van RavensAgent
1 appearance

for Town of Leamington

Laura RauchAgent
2 appearances
Ginny CampbellAgent
1 appearance
Delores JefferyAgent
1 appearance

for Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville

Tracy ParsonsAgent
1 appearance

for T Valeri Construction Limited

Paul GrosmanAgent
2 appearances

for Vale Canada Limited

Belinda SchubertCounsel
2 appearances
Philip SanfordCounsel
2 appearances

for Werh Group Inc.

Bonnie PetroAgent
1 appearance

for Z.C.

E.C.Agent
1 appearance

Self-represented

P.H.Self-represented
1 appearance

252

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

2.0

cases/mo

OARB252(100%)

Decision types

appeal

202

trial

motion

Page 5 of 13 (252 cases)