Representation vote ordered in certification application with ballot box sealed due to bargaining unit dispute.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees at the responding party's manufacturing plant.
The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and proposed a different unit description, giving notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Board found that the applicant's proposed unit could be appropriate and that the union had the requisite 40 percent membership support.
The Board ordered a representation vote to be held, with the ballot box sealed pending resolution of the significant numerical difference and the appropriate bargaining unit description.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant sought to withdraw the application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Union certified as bargaining agent for registered nurses following successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for registered nurses at Tilbury Manor Nursing Home.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.
The applicant sought to withdraw the application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Representation vote ordered in union certification application.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.
The Board ordered a representation vote to be held on July 5, 2001, and directed that any ballots cast by individuals whose inclusion in the bargaining unit is disputed be segregated.
Applicant directed to provide detailed statement of material facts for duty of fair representation complaint.
The applicant filed a complaint alleging a breach of section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 by the responding union.
The Board found the application lacked sufficient details regarding the alleged unlawful conduct.
The Board directed the applicant to provide a detailed written statement of material facts and requested remedies, failing which the application may be dismissed.
Board directed employer to produce agreed documents or file submissions regarding refusals prior to hearing.
The applicant union requested an order directing the responding party employer to produce certain documents prior to a scheduled hearing.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the responding party to produce any agreed-upon documents by July 5, 2001, and to file submissions regarding any refused documents by the same date.
Any remaining disputes over production were to be addressed at the outset of the hearing on July 6, 2001.
Deadline for filing a response extended to July 5, 2001.
The responding party requested an extension of time to file a response.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and extended the deadline to July 5, 2001.
Representation vote directed in certification application despite employer's section 8.1 notice.
The applicant trade union applied for certification.
The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The majority of the Board found that the applicant established sufficient membership support to direct a representation vote and have it counted, with segregated ballots for disputed positions.
The dissenting Board member would have directed the ballot box to be sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.
Employer directed to file submissions within two days or objections to successor union declaration deemed withdrawn.
The applicant requested that the Board make successor trade union declarations, noting its understanding that the employer had withdrawn its objections but that attempts to contact employer counsel were unsuccessful.
The Board directed the employer to file submissions within two days, failing which it would be deemed to have withdrawn its objections.
Union decertified after majority of employees voted in opposition during representation vote.
The applicant filed an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of Loeb Fisher Street.
Union certification application dismissed after failing to achieve majority support in representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification.
Following a representation vote where not more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statement of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.
The Board directed the parties' attention to section 10(3) of the Act regarding the effect on any subsequent application filed within one year.
Applications listed for hearing; preliminary objections regarding late filing deferred to the hearing panel.
The applicant requested that the Board schedule the applications for hearing and bar the responding party from presenting evidence due to a late response.
The responding party subsequently filed its responses, raising preliminary objections that the Board should defer to the grievance procedure.
The Board directed that the applications be listed for hearing together and deferred the preliminary issues to the hearing panel.
Union certification granted following a successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of employees at the responding party's Kingston location.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a final decision without a hearing.
The Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate and directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Representation vote directed in union certification application after finding sufficient membership support.
The applicant union filed an application for certification.
The Board found the applicant to be a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and determined that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.
The Board directed a representation vote, ordering that ballots cast by individuals in disputed student positions be segregated.
Board orders production of documents and appoints officer to resolve segregated ballots following representation vote.
Following a representation vote where the margin between two unions was one vote and 23 ballots were segregated, the United Steelworkers of America requested particulars and document production regarding the challenged individuals.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the parties to file briefs setting out the issues in dispute and the facts relied upon, along with relevant documents.
The Board also appointed a Board Officer to meet with the parties to attempt to resolve the matters in dispute.
Application adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.
The applicant union and responding employers agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the application would be deemed terminated if no party requested to proceed.
Applications adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.
The parties agreed to adjourn the applications sine die for a period not exceeding one year.
The Board consented to the adjournment, noting that the matters would be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made within that time.
Board corrects typographical errors in statutory references in its previous decision.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a brief decision to correct typographical errors in its previous decision dated June 14, 2001.
The references to subsections 82.4 and 82.3 of the Employment Standards Act were corrected to read subsections 82.3(4) and 82.3(1), respectively.