Caroline Rowan

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Union certification granted following a successful representation vote and resolution of outstanding issues.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of employees at Car Canada Corporation.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, the parties resolved all outstanding issues.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate and directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation & General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Car Canada Corporation, 2001 CanLII 17189

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Proceeding terminated following an agreement between the parties.

The applicant union and responding employer reached an agreement dated July 4, 2001.

Having regard to this agreement, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the proceeding terminated.

International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers, Local 95 v. Nel-Tekk Industrial Specialties Inc., 2001 CanLII 4782

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Unopposed application for a declaration of successor union rights granted.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of its predecessor, Service Employees International Union, Local 204, by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.

The responding parties initially filed objections but subsequently withdrew them, leaving the application unopposed.

The Board granted the application and issued the requested declaration.

Service Employees International Union, Local 528 v. Service Employees International Union, Local 204, 2001 CanLII 3068

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

OLRBDissenting0 cases1980–2001

OPSEU declared bargaining agent for paramedics following successful representation vote.

Following a representation vote directed by the Board in which a majority of ballots were cast in favour of the Ontario Public Service Employees Union, the Board declared OPSEU as the bargaining agent for the paramedic employees of Health Trust Pre Hospital Services Inc. pursuant to section 69(6) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board also granted leave to withdraw a related application.

Ontario Public Service Employees Union v. Health Trust Pre Hospital Services Inc., 2001 CanLII 12099

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

OLRBMajority0 cases1987–2001

Caroline Rowan

Representation vote ordered in certification application despite employer's section 8.1 notice disputing bargaining unit composition.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees at the responding party's hotel.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and that it had established sufficient membership support in its proposed bargaining unit to warrant a representation vote.

The responding party disputed the bargaining unit description and the number of employees, giving notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The majority of the Board directed a representation vote and ordered that ballots of individuals in disputed positions be segregated.

The dissenting Board member would have ordered the ballot box sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.

Teamsters Local Union 938 v. Holiday Inn Express Whitby / Oshawa, 2001 CanLII 11158

Caroline Rowan

Deadline for filing a response or intervention extended to August 10, 2001.

The responding party requested an extension of time to file a response or intervention.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, extending the deadline to August 10, 2001.

Grantley Howell v. USWA Local 7135, 2001 CanLII 3971

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Board directs representation vote in application for termination of bargaining rights.

The applicants applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration terminating the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

The Board found that not less than forty percent of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the union.

Despite the union's assertion that the application should be dismissed without a vote under section 63(16), the Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with the ballot box not to be sealed, and deferred outstanding issues to a post-vote hearing.

Conte et al. v. Canadian Union of Public Employees (Cupe) and its’ Local Union No. 145, 2001 CanLII 2671

Caroline Rowan

Application withdrawn by leave of the Board.

The applicant requested to withdraw the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Chris Schler v. Falconbridge Ltd., 2001 CanLII 8939

Caroline Rowan

Extension of time to file a response granted.

The responding party requested an extension of time to file a response.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, extending the deadline to July 14, 2001.

Christopher Eyre v. C.A.W. - Canada, 2001 CanLII 17099

Caroline Rowan

Application withdrawn by leave of the Board at the applicant's request.

The applicant requested to withdraw her application against the Canadian Auto Workers Union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn by leave of the Board.

Lisa Woolley v. Canadian Auto Workers Union, 2001 CanLII 15864

Caroline Rowan

Applicant directed to file submissions responding to union's request to dismiss section 96 application.

The applicant filed an application under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The responding union requested that the Board dismiss the application for failing to make out a prima facie case or, alternatively, because it is premature as a grievance on the same subject matter is proceeding.

The Board directed the applicant to file submissions in response to these preliminary issues within five days.

Angele Gilbert v. United Food Commercial Workers International Union, Local 175, 2001 CanLII 14977

Caroline Rowan

Application adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.

The applicant filed an application against the responding party union.

On the agreement of the parties, the Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

Victoria Anne Hartwell v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 1133, 2001 CanLII 13935

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application and ordered the responding party to post copies of the decision for 30 days.

Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Town of Ajax, 2001 CanLII 20423

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Union certification granted following a successful representation vote by the employees.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for the employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate.

The Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant and cancelled previously set meeting and hearing dates.

IWA - Canada v. North Shore Steel Products Limited, 2001 CanLII 18480

Caroline Rowan

Applicant directed to deliver application materials to responding party after failure to do so.

The responding party advised the Board that it had not received a copy of the application, contrary to the applicant's Certificate of Delivery.

The Board directed the applicant to deliver the application and required documents to the responding party forthwith and to file a further Certificate of Delivery.

Guy Guerette v. U.A.W. Local 251, 2001 CanLII 16738

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Union certified as bargaining agent for paramedical employees following successful representation vote.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for paramedical employees of the responding party hospital.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Board certified the union.

A certificate was ordered to issue for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation & General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Wilson Memorial General Hospital, 2001 CanLII 16456

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Board directs representation vote for daycare employees after finding union membership threshold met.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party daycare centre.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and determined the appropriate bargaining unit based on the parties' agreement.

Finding that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

Teamsters International Union, Local 847, AFL-C10-CLC v. Brock Daycare Centre, 2001 CanLII 11005

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Board directs representation vote in application to terminate union's bargaining rights.

The applicant applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration terminating the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

The Board found the application timely and that not less than forty percent of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the trade union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

Melvern Murray v. Teamsters Local Union 938, 2001 CanLII 10989

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Employment and Labour Law

Board directs representation vote in displacement application for certification of security guards.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the security guards employed by the responding party.

Brewery, General & Professional Workers Union v. York Condominium Corporation No. 76, 2001 CanLII 10395

appearing on behalf of the applicant

N. BlumCounsel
1 appearance
J. FilmanCounsel
1 appearance
Cindy Cossar-JonesCounsel
1 appearance
C. LaceCounsel
1 appearance
Ann BigelowCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth MantzCounsel
1 appearance

appearing on behalf of the respondent

Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance
Louise KozaCounsel
1 appearance

appearing on his own behalf

Bert PerbiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark MiddletonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kamal ElassalSelf-represented
1 appearance

Applicant

John TaiteSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for 308237 Ontario Limited and 245 Ouellette Ave. Investments Ltd.

Susan FanelliAgent
1 appearance

for ABC Taxi (Brockville) Ltd. and Safedrive Inc., carrying on business as City Cab

Mohan GillAgent
1 appearance

for Algoma University and Arthur Perlini

Scott WilliamsCounsel
1 appearance

for Apple Mechanical and Nu-Flow Systems

Ruth HarnimanCounsel
1 appearance
David DefrancescoCounsel
1 appearance

for BMWE

David BrownUnion representative
1 appearance
Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance
Dan KennedyUnion representative
1 appearance
Jack ChokanUnion representative
1 appearance
John RiouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Ron BowdenUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick PhillipsUnion representative
1 appearance

for Cheryl Reed-Elder

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for CLN

Jay NuscaAgent
1 appearance
N. LavergneAgent
1 appearance
David LawCounsel
1 appearance
J. WhiteAgent
1 appearance
K. RangerAgent
1 appearance
Bob RustenAgent
1 appearance

for CUPE

Brian SheehanUnion representative
1 appearance
Tom BakerUnion representative
1 appearance

for employer

Samy OuanounouAgent
1 appearance

for herself

Anita KandasammySelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Adolf AstlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ashraf HemedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Alan RowlandsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barry LarkinSelf-represented
1 appearance

for IBM Canada Limited

Valerie A.E. DyerCounsel
1 appearance

for LIUNA, Local 1036

W SuppaCounsel
1 appearance
L. A. RichmondCounsel
1 appearance
A. BowkerCounsel
1 appearance

for MacIsaac Mining and Tunnelling

Mr. GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Mr. BergeronCounsel
1 appearance

for Marathon-Delco Inc., 308237 Ontario Limited and 245 Ouellette Ave. Investments Ltd.

Arthur BaratCounsel
1 appearance
Avril FarlamCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Angèle CadieuxUnion representative
1 appearance
Suzanne Hébert-VaillantUnion representative
1 appearance
Linda KernohanUnion representative
1 appearance
Maureen DoyleUnion representative
1 appearance

for OPSEU

E. OgibowskiUnion representative
1 appearance

for SEIU

Cathy CarrollUnion representative
1 appearance

for the applicant

Harold F. CaleyCounsel
2 appearances
Jim ParéCounsel
2 appearances
Anthony F. DaleCounsel
2 appearances
D. McBrideUnion representative
1 appearance
Daniel McBrideCounsel
1 appearance
Sam CiniAgent
1 appearance
Konstantinos GlambedakisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raymond LemayAgent
1 appearance
S. C. BernardoCounsel
1 appearance
Rick ButeraUnion representative
1 appearance
George MillngtonAgent
1 appearance
Michael GottheilCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Sharen HowarthAgent
1 appearance
D. LefaiveAgent
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance
Robert SahotaAgent
1 appearance
Jean-Denis BélecCounsel
1 appearance
Karen NorthgraveAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Jimmy GorgievSelf-represented
2 appearances
Jean-Alexandre De BousquetCounsel
1 appearance
André NowakowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Aristide TsemoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Luigi CaringiAgent
1 appearance
Mitra Mohed ArangehSelf-represented
1 appearance
Grantley HowellAgent
1 appearance
Andrzej OrlowskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Arvind KarirSelf-represented
1 appearance
C. BeaupréCounsel
1 appearance
Selwyn PietersCounsel
1 appearance
Achille John RuffoloSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maria AndradeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Amanda Elisabeth KeelerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Désiré NdombaAgent
1 appearance

for the applicants

Kevin McGeeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicants

Thomas ArnoldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter GravSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Belanger Ford Lincoln Centre Limited

Guy BeaulieuAgent
1 appearance
Leah ClarkeAgent
1 appearance
Robert GirouxAgent
1 appearance
France Bélanger-HouleAgent
1 appearance

for the CAW and CAW Supporters

Farah BalooAgent
1 appearance
Patrick WarnerAgent
1 appearance
L. N. GottheilCounsel
1 appearance
Karen CobbAgent
1 appearance
Alex SalagubandAgent
1 appearance
Nasir MohamedAgent
1 appearance
Ananthanasa VerasinghamAgent
1 appearance

for the claimant

David BrewsterAgent
1 appearance
Angie LeeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Roy LeeAgent
1 appearance

for the County

J. A. MurrayAgent
1 appearance

for the Employee

Margurite ToutounjianSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the employees

Barry W. AdamsCounsel
1 appearance
Anna Marie VentrescaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the employer

Victoria WillSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim JohnstonAgent
1 appearance
Sandra JonesAgent
1 appearance
Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Debbie FeltisAgent
1 appearance
Peter WadsworthCounsel
1 appearance

for the Employer

Arthur BaratAgent
1 appearance

for the group of employees

Brent GuilboardAgent
1 appearance
Robert CountrymanAgent
1 appearance

for the intervenor

Lisa CompagnoneCounsel
1 appearance
Henry WatsonUnion representative
1 appearance
Wayne DeMilleUnion representative
1 appearance
Ray BrazeauAgent
1 appearance
John McInnesCounsel
1 appearance
William LeMayCounsel
1 appearance
John L. StoutCounsel
1 appearance
Tracy McPheeAgent
1 appearance
Jeff NesterUnion representative
1 appearance
Melissa NixonCounsel
1 appearance
D. WrayCounsel
1 appearance
Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance
Michael HylandCounsel
1 appearance
Derek RogersCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin WilsonCounsel
1 appearance
Lynn TessaroAgent
1 appearance
Sam MandelbaumAgent
1 appearance
Grant Radley-WaltersCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew RegnerusUnion representative
1 appearance
Brenda PrieurCounsel
1 appearance

for the intervenor employer

Yves FricotCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry

Laurie EisenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Karen NortheyCounsel
2 appearances
Heidi Ann Lazar-MeynCounsel
2 appearances
Jeremy WarningCounsel
1 appearance
Frank CamilleriAgent
1 appearance
Karima ChaturAgent
1 appearance
Karima ChaturCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie EisenbergAgent
1 appearance
Karen NortheyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Labour

Karima ChaturCounsel
4 appearances
Karen NortheyCounsel
2 appearances
Karima ChaturAgent
2 appearances
Frank CamilleriAgent
1 appearance
Richard HousenAgent
1 appearance
Jeremy WarningCounsel
1 appearance
Karen NortheyAgent
1 appearance
Darcy WatsonAgent
1 appearance
Heidi Ann Lazar-MeynAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Council

Harold F. CaleyCounsel
1 appearance
Charles CallinganCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Stuart DucoffeCounsel
1 appearance
Sharon DuffyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

David PatacairkCounsel
1 appearance
Martha CookCounsel
1 appearance
Larry CulverCounsel
1 appearance
Michael GwynneCounsel
1 appearance

for the responding employee

David RitchieSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the responding employer

Ernie GecAgent
1 appearance

for the responding parties

Patrick H. MacIsaacAgent
1 appearance
Brian R. GatienCounsel
1 appearance
James FysheCounsel
1 appearance

for the responding party

Robert BradtCounsel
1 appearance
Peter YemenUnion representative
1 appearance
Brian SweetCounsel
1 appearance
Ron GroulxUnion representative
1 appearance
Jack SullensCounsel
1 appearance
Brian P. NolanCounsel
1 appearance
George NielsonAgent
1 appearance
Frank CanningAgent
1 appearance
J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance
M. Patrick MoranCounsel
1 appearance
Dave MichorAgent
1 appearance
Joseph LibermanCounsel
1 appearance
Doug WilsonAgent
1 appearance
Don TalaricoUnion representative
1 appearance
Charlene AvonUnion representative
1 appearance
James FysheCounsel
1 appearance
Ellen SpeerUnion representative
1 appearance
Candy LanganUnion representative
1 appearance
Nancy RosenbergCounsel
1 appearance
Linda PaquetteUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Responding Party

John MatasAgent
1 appearance
Longina FrydrychSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the responding party employer

Hugo Von SchoberCounsel
1 appearance

for the SEIU

Teresa MinchellaAgent
1 appearance
Joman JaraAgent
1 appearance
Antonio ElevazoAgent
1 appearance
John L. StoutCounsel
1 appearance
John R. EvansCounsel
1 appearance
Amelita RoqueAgent
1 appearance
Karen WalshAgent
1 appearance

for the union

Harold F. CalyCounsel
1 appearance
Michelle DuncanCounsel
1 appearance
Tim YoungUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Union

Luciano MascarinUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers of America

Guy LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
David LiptonUnion representative
1 appearance
Johanne WilsonUnion representative
1 appearance
David DooreyCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Azmina JivanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Armando MinicucciAgent
1 appearance
Agnese MinicucciSelf-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf

Samir BoucennaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jacques MessierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nevin PattonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne BradySelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Andrzej OrlowskiSelf-represented
1 appearance

pour IBM Canada Limited, intimée

Valerie A.E. DyerCounsel
1 appearance

600

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

2.2

cases/mo

OLRB554(92%)

HRTO27(5%)

OPEHT19(3%)

Decision types

motion

470

trial

appeal

/Adjudicator

Caroline Rowan — Vice-Chair

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Health Law

Caroline Rowan

Vice-Chair·Ontario Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal·Since 1999

OPEHT OLRB HRTO

600

cases · 24 yrs · OLRB, HRTO, OPEHT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-Chair· 228Vice-Chair· 174Vice-Chair· 162Adjudicator· 23Vice-Chair· Chair· 3Arbitre· 2Vice-Chair· Chair· 1Adjudicator· 1

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 10, 2001

Board issues consent order terminating union's bargaining rights following sale of business and intermingling.

The parties reached a settlement agreeing that a sale occurred, employees were intermingled, and a large disparity existed between union and non-union employees.

The Board issued a consent order declaring the applicant a successor employer and terminating the union's bargaining rights retroactive to the date of the sale.

Brant Community Healthcare System v. Ontario Public Service Employees Union, 2001 CanLII 5048

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Union certification granted following a successful representation vote and resolution of outstanding issues.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of employees at Car Canada Corporation.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, the parties resolved all outstanding issues.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate and directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation & General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Car Canada Corporation, 2001 CanLII 17189

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Proceeding terminated following an agreement between the parties.

The applicant union and responding employer reached an agreement dated July 4, 2001.

Having regard to this agreement, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the proceeding terminated.

International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers, Local 95 v. Nel-Tekk Industrial Specialties Inc., 2001 CanLII 4782

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Unopposed application for a declaration of successor union rights granted.

The responding parties initially filed objections but subsequently withdrew them, leaving the application unopposed.

The Board granted the application and issued the requested declaration.

Service Employees International Union, Local 528 v. Service Employees International Union, Local 204, 2001 CanLII 3068

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

OLRBDissenting0 cases1980–2001

OPSEU declared bargaining agent for paramedics following successful representation vote.

The Board also granted leave to withdraw a related application.

Ontario Public Service Employees Union v. Health Trust Pre Hospital Services Inc., 2001 CanLII 12099

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

OLRBMajority0 cases1987–2001

Caroline Rowan

Representation vote ordered in certification application despite employer's section 8.1 notice disputing bargaining unit composition.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees at the responding party's hotel.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and that it had established sufficient membership support in its proposed bargaining unit to warrant a representation vote.

The responding party disputed the bargaining unit description and the number of employees, giving notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The majority of the Board directed a representation vote and ordered that ballots of individuals in disputed positions be segregated.

The dissenting Board member would have ordered the ballot box sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.

Teamsters Local Union 938 v. Holiday Inn Express Whitby / Oshawa, 2001 CanLII 11158

Caroline Rowan

Deadline for filing a response or intervention extended to August 10, 2001.

The responding party requested an extension of time to file a response or intervention.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, extending the deadline to August 10, 2001.

Grantley Howell v. USWA Local 7135, 2001 CanLII 3971

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Board directs representation vote in application for termination of bargaining rights.

The applicants applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration terminating the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

The Board found that not less than forty percent of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the union.

Conte et al. v. Canadian Union of Public Employees (Cupe) and its’ Local Union No. 145, 2001 CanLII 2671

Caroline Rowan

Application withdrawn by leave of the Board.

The applicant requested to withdraw the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Chris Schler v. Falconbridge Ltd., 2001 CanLII 8939

Caroline Rowan

Extension of time to file a response granted.

The responding party requested an extension of time to file a response.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, extending the deadline to July 14, 2001.

Christopher Eyre v. C.A.W. - Canada, 2001 CanLII 17099

Caroline Rowan

Application withdrawn by leave of the Board at the applicant's request.

The applicant requested to withdraw her application against the Canadian Auto Workers Union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn by leave of the Board.

Lisa Woolley v. Canadian Auto Workers Union, 2001 CanLII 15864

Caroline Rowan

Applicant directed to file submissions responding to union's request to dismiss section 96 application.

The applicant filed an application under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board directed the applicant to file submissions in response to these preliminary issues within five days.

Angele Gilbert v. United Food Commercial Workers International Union, Local 175, 2001 CanLII 14977

Caroline Rowan

Application adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.

The applicant filed an application against the responding party union.

On the agreement of the parties, the Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

Victoria Anne Hartwell v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 1133, 2001 CanLII 13935

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application and ordered the responding party to post copies of the decision for 30 days.

Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Town of Ajax, 2001 CanLII 20423

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Union certification granted following a successful representation vote by the employees.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for the employees of the responding party.

The Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant and cancelled previously set meeting and hearing dates.

IWA - Canada v. North Shore Steel Products Limited, 2001 CanLII 18480

Caroline Rowan

Applicant directed to deliver application materials to responding party after failure to do so.

The responding party advised the Board that it had not received a copy of the application, contrary to the applicant's Certificate of Delivery.

The Board directed the applicant to deliver the application and required documents to the responding party forthwith and to file a further Certificate of Delivery.

Guy Guerette v. U.A.W. Local 251, 2001 CanLII 16738

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Union certified as bargaining agent for paramedical employees following successful representation vote.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for paramedical employees of the responding party hospital.

A certificate was ordered to issue for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation & General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Wilson Memorial General Hospital, 2001 CanLII 16456

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Board directs representation vote for daycare employees after finding union membership threshold met.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party daycare centre.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and determined the appropriate bargaining unit based on the parties' agreement.

Finding that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

Teamsters International Union, Local 847, AFL-C10-CLC v. Brock Daycare Centre, 2001 CanLII 11005

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan

Board directs representation vote in application to terminate union's bargaining rights.

The applicant applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration terminating the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

The Board found the application timely and that not less than forty percent of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the trade union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

Melvern Murray v. Teamsters Local Union 938, 2001 CanLII 10989

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Caroline Rowan