Employment standards appeal adjourned to provide notice to a potentially affected related corporation.
The applicant appealed an Employment Standards Officer's refusal to issue an Order to Pay for unpaid wages against a related corporation, which the Officer found was statute-barred.
At the hearing, the Board noted that the related corporation had not been listed as a responding party and did not receive notice of the hearing.
Because any decision would affect the corporation, the Board adjourned the hearing and directed the applicant to provide contact information so proper notice could be given.
Application terminated following minutes of settlement between the parties.
The applicant filed an application which was subsequently resolved by the parties.
Having regard to the Minutes of Settlement reached between the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board terminated the application.
Employment standards appeal adjourned pending resolution of related criminal proceedings involving the applicant's wife.
The applicant appealed an Employment Standards Officer's refusal to make an Order to Pay against the responding party employer.
At the hearing, the parties agreed to adjourn the matter on the merits until criminal proceedings involving the applicant's wife are conclusively resolved.
The Board granted the adjournment and directed the parties to file written submissions regarding a preliminary issue of whether the applicant's wife must produce documents requested in a summons to witness.
Application for unpaid wages dismissed as it was filed outside the strict statutory limitation period.
The applicant filed a claim for unpaid wages under the Employment Standards Act.
The applicant's last day of work was October 1, 1999, but the claim was not filed until November 27, 2000.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application, finding that it was barred by the strict limitation period in section 82.3(1) of the Act, which the Board has no discretion to vary.
Employer's appeal dismissed for non-attendance; subsequent explanatory letter treated as request for reconsideration.
The applicant employer failed to attend the scheduled hearing for its appeal of an Order to Pay.
After standing down for half an hour, the Board orally dismissed the appeal.
Subsequently, the applicant's counsel advised the Board that the failure to attend was due to an inadvertent office error.
The Board treated this correspondence as a request for reconsideration and directed the parties to file submissions.
Board issues consent order declaring municipality as successor employer following transfer of transportation department.
The applicant union applied under section 69 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that the municipality was the successor employer to the public utility commission following the transfer of the transportation department.
The parties reached a settlement and requested a consent order.
The Board issued declarations on consent confirming the municipality as the successor employer bound by the existing collective agreements and bargaining unit descriptions.
Board issued procedural directions and scheduled a hearing for a labour relations transition application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued procedural directions in an application under the Public Sector Labour Relations Transition Act, 1997.
The Board directed the parties to file briefs and documents regarding the issues in dispute and scheduled a consultation and/or hearing for May 7, 2001.
Union certified for Kingston bargaining unit but application dismissed for Belleville/Bancroft unit following representation votes.
The applicant union applied for certification for two bargaining units: Kingston and Belleville/Bancroft.
Following representation votes, the union failed to secure more than fifty per cent of the ballots in the Belleville/Bancroft unit, resulting in the dismissal of that portion of the application.
However, the union secured more than fifty per cent of the ballots in the Kingston unit.
The Board issued a certificate for the Kingston bargaining unit.
Board corrects previous decision to direct parties to section 10(3) of the Labour Relations Act.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a decision correcting paragraph 5 of its previous decision dated April 5, 2001.
The Board revoked the original paragraph 5 and substituted it with a new paragraph directing the parties and employees to section 10(3) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, regarding any future application for certification.
Union decertified following a representation vote where a majority of employees voted in opposition.
The applicant applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the Sexual Assault Crisis Centre of Windsor Essex County.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board at the applicant's request.
The applicant requested to withdraw the application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant requested to withdraw its application.
Applications withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant, Michael Dub, sought to withdraw two applications against the Ministry of Correctional Services, Management Board of Cabinet, The Crown in the Right of Ontario, and OPSEU.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the applications.
Union certification granted for part-time taxi dispatchers following a successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent part-time order takers and dispatch system operators employed by the responding party.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Application dismissed due to applicant's failure to file a required reply.
The applicant failed to file a reply to the requests for dismissal made by the responding party and the intervenor, despite a Board direction to do so.
As a result, the application was dismissed.
Representation vote directed in application for termination of bargaining rights.
The applicant applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that the responding party trade union no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit.
The Board found the application timely and that not less than forty percent of the employees had expressed a wish not to be represented by the trade union.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.
Board directs representation vote for LINC instructors at York Catholic District School Board.
The Canadian Union of Public Employees applied for certification to represent Language Instructors for New Comers to Canada (LINC) employed by the York Catholic District School Board.
The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and determined the appropriate bargaining unit based on the parties' agreement.
Finding that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed unit were members of the union, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken.
Representation vote ordered for proposed bargaining unit with segregated ballots for part-time employees.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that it established sufficient membership support in its proposed bargaining unit to obtain a representation vote.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the individuals in the voting constituency, with segregated ballots for employees working not more than 24 hours per week, pending resolution of their inclusion in the bargaining unit.