The plaintiff sued multiple corporate and individual defendants for fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent misrepresentation, conspiracy, and intentional interference with economic relations, alleging they stripped assets from a judgment debtor to avoid payment.
The defendants moved to strike the statement of claim under Rule 21 for failing to plead material facts.
The court granted the motions in part, striking the tort claims with leave to amend because the plaintiff failed to plead the specific material facts required for each cause of action against each individual defendant.
The court also struck claims for contempt and sequestration without leave to amend, holding that such relief must be sought by motion under the Rules of Civil Procedure, not as free-standing claims in an action.
