Wallace Leo Murray

The appellant appealed a trial judgment ordering him to pay rent, remove his boathouse, and enjoining him from entering the respondent's property.

The trial judge found the boathouse was situated on the respondent's land and a landlord-tenant relationship existed.

The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge's findings that the boathouse was at least partly on the respondent's land and that a landlord-tenant relationship existed.

The Court amended the trial judge's order, which was overly broad in declaring the respondent owned all the land on which the boathouse rested, but otherwise dismissed the appeal.

The appellant farmer appealed a trial judgment ordering him to pay the respondent for soybean seed, chemicals, and spraying services, and dismissing his counterclaim for crop losses.

The appellant argued the trial judge erred in finding he authorized a herbicide substitution, in enforcing an allegedly illegal contract for an unregistered pesticide combination, and in calculating the quantity of soybeans ordered.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable and overriding error in the trial judge's factual findings and concluding that enforcing the contract for the unregistered pesticide combination was not contrary to public policy.