The appellant appealed a trial judgment ordering him to pay rent, remove his boathouse, and enjoining him from entering the respondent's property.
The trial judge found the boathouse was situated on the respondent's land and a landlord-tenant relationship existed.
The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge's findings that the boathouse was at least partly on the respondent's land and that a landlord-tenant relationship existed.
The Court amended the trial judge's order, which was overly broad in declaring the respondent owned all the land on which the boathouse rested, but otherwise dismissed the appeal.
