21 total
Appeal dismissed; appellant knowingly operated an uninsured vehicle and insurer not estopped from denying benefits.
The appellant appealed an arbitration order finding that the insurer was not required to pay him further income replacement benefits because he was knowingly operating an uninsured motor vehicle at the time of the accident.
The appellant sought to introduce fresh evidence and raise a new waiver argument on appeal.
The Director's Delegate admitted part of the fresh evidence but refused the waiver argument.
On the merits, the Director's Delegate upheld the arbitrator's findings that the vehicle's coverage had been deleted at the spouse's request, that the appellant knew of the deletion, and that the insurer was not estopped from denying coverage.
The appeal was dismissed.