The accused was tried on a twelve-count indictment alleging various acts of domestic violence against his former partner, including assault, assault with a weapon, mischief, and uttering threats.
The trial primarily hinged on credibility, with the complainant detailing multiple incidents of physical abuse and the accused denying all allegations.
Applying the W.D. framework, the court found the accused's testimony lacked credibility and reliability, while the complainant's evidence was supported by extrinsic evidence such as photographs of her injuries and prior consistent statements.
The accused was found guilty on eight counts, acquitted on three counts due to reasonable doubt, and one count was stayed under the Kienapple principle.
