2 total
Appeals for residential severances within a floodplain dismissed; municipal official plan amendment and zoning by-law upheld.
The appellant appealed the City of Richmond Hill's refusal of consent applications to sever a property to create two new residential lots, as well as the City's Official Plan Amendment No. 22 and By-law 64-21, which expanded the Lake Wilcox Special Policy Area.
The appellant argued that the property was not within the Regulatory Floodplain and that the City's floodplain mapping was flawed.
The Tribunal accepted the evidence of the City and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority that the property is located within the Regulatory Floodplain and lacks safe access during flood events.
The Tribunal found that the proposed severances were inconsistent with provincial policies protecting public safety and environmental integrity.
The Tribunal upheld OPA 22 and By-law 64-21, finding them to be grounded in sound planning principles and supported by robust technical analysis, and dismissed the appeals.
Tribunal approves Yonge and Bernard KDA Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law modifications, dismissing remaining appeals.
The Ontario Land Tribunal heard Phase 2 of appeals regarding the Yonge and Bernard Key Development Area (KDA) Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law in the City of Richmond Hill.
The hearing focused on site-specific development applications and policies for the eastern quadrants and the Di Pede lands in the northwest quadrant.
The Tribunal approved the City's proposed modifications, which were supported by expert planning, transportation, and environmental evidence.
The Tribunal upheld the Greenway System designation and natural hazard buffer requirements for the northeast quadrant, dismissing the appeals of North Elgin Centre Inc. (NEC), which failed to call any evidence.
All other appeals were dismissed, bringing the Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law into effect for the remaining lands.
No co-appearing lawyers found.
No judges found.