Who is Michael Smith?

Michael Smith has a minicounsel lawyer profile with 42 linked court cases from 2009 to 2026.

What courts has Michael Smith appeared in?

Michael Smith has appeared in Superior Court of Justice, Ontario Court of Justice, Court of Appeal for Ontario, Ontario Financial Services Commission - Dispute Resolution Services, Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario, with most appearances at the Superior Court of Justice.

How many cases has Michael Smith handled?

Michael Smith has 42 cases on record from 2009 to 2026.

What judges has Michael Smith appeared before?

Michael Smith has most frequently appeared before Justice Julianne A. Parfett, Justice Peter K. Doody, Justice Anne E. London-Weinstein.

minicounsel

Criminal and Quasi-Criminal Law

Civil Litigation - Defendant

Civil Litigation - Plaintiff

Administrative Law

Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule matters (SABS)

Family and Matrimonial Law

Human Rights

Immigration Law

Indigenous Legal Issues

Other Tribunals

Michael Smith

motions

SCJ

LSO Profile

LSO #46171P

cases · SCJ, OCJ, OCA, OFSCDRS, AGCO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

42 total

Appeal dismissed as the court found no basis to interfere with the lower court's decision.

The appellants appealed an order of the Superior Court of Justice.

The Court of Appeal found no basis to interfere with the lower court judge's decision.

The appeal was dismissed with costs awarded to each respondent in the amount of $2,000.

Hussaini v. Bains, 2010 ONCA 649

Respondent Counsel

Richard Kulis

189 cases2003–2018

Michael Smith

42 cases2009–2026

S. Grace Kerr

AGCO0 cases2007–2017

AGCOAlcohol and Gaming Commission of OntarioJan 8, 2009

Mutual disclosure ordered ten days prior to liquor licence suspension hearing.

At a pre-hearing teleconference regarding a Notice of Proposal to suspend a liquor licence, the Board of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario ordered mutual disclosure.

The Licensee was ordered to provide a witness list and detailed evidence summaries, and both parties were ordered to complete disclosure ten days prior to the scheduled hearing date.