Khrystina McMillan

The plaintiff brought a motion for summary judgment claiming damages for wrongful dismissal, aggravated damages, and punitive damages.

The defendant employer initially terminated the plaintiff for cause but later withdrew the allegation, relying instead on a without cause termination provision in her employment agreement.

The court found the termination provision void for lack of consideration and held that the employer's conduct—including creating a toxic workplace, suspending her, and making unfounded cause allegations—amounted to a repudiation of the contract.

The court awarded 11 months' reasonable notice, $50,000 in aggravated damages, and $25,000 in punitive damages.

The plaintiff landlord sued the defendant tenant for damages after the tenant repudiated a commercial lease with eight years remaining.

The repudiation forced the plaintiff to sell the property, as it could not afford the carrying costs without the rental income and re-letting was unfeasible.

The defendants admitted liability but argued the plaintiff suffered no damages because the property was sold at fair market value.

The court rejected this argument, finding the forced sale was not at fair market value and did not compensate the plaintiff for the lost income stream and capital appreciation.

The court accepted the plaintiff's discounted cash flow analysis to quantify damages, using the 2015 appraised fair market value to account for foreseeable lost capital appreciation, and assuming reasonable mitigation through a hypothetical investment in a REIT basket.