Jason Bogle

The applicant, a former paralegal whose licence was revoked in 2018 for professional misconduct including filing forged documents and practicing while suspended, applied for re-licensing.

The Law Society referred the application to the Tribunal to determine if she met the good character requirement.

The Tribunal applied the Armstrong factors and found that the applicant lacked meaningful insight into her past misconduct and failed to demonstrate true remorse or rehabilitation.

The application for re-licensing was dismissed.

The claimant commenced a proceeding under section 26 of the Expropriations Act for compensation arising from the expropriation of parts of their lands by the Regional Municipality of Durham.

A Case Management Conference was held to schedule a hearing and issue a Procedural Order.

The Tribunal scheduled a three-day video hearing to commence on May 5, 2027, and issued a Procedural Order governing the future conduct of the proceeding, including mediation and the exchange of expert appraisal reports.

The claimant filed an application for determination of compensation under the Expropriations Act.

The Ontario Land Tribunal notified the claimant's counsel on two occasions that the required appeal fee was outstanding and warned that failure to pay would result in dismissal.

The claimant failed to submit the fee within the specified timeframe.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application pursuant to section 19(1)(a) of the Ontario Land Tribunal Act, 2021.

The appellants sought reconsideration of a Licence Appeal Tribunal decision that confirmed a 30-day suspension and seizure order of their Commercial Vehicle Operator's Registration (CVOR) certificates.

The appellants alleged procedural unfairness and errors of law and fact, including issues regarding the assessment of their violation rates, alleged police bias, the interpretation of sections 171 and 177 of the Highway Traffic Act, and the consideration of a manager's driving incident.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for reconsideration, finding no violation of procedural fairness and no errors of law or fact that would have changed the outcome.

The appellants, two tow truck companies, appealed a 30-day Suspension and Seizure Order of their Commercial Vehicle Operator Registrations (CVOR) issued by the Registrar of Motor Vehicles.

The Tribunal found that the two companies were related entities under the Highway Traffic Act.

Based on the companies' poor safety records and numerous police reports detailing unsafe roadside behaviour and refusal to follow police direction at collision scenes, the Tribunal concluded there were reasonable grounds to believe the appellants would not operate commercial vehicles safely or in accordance with the law.

The appeal was dismissed and the suspension order was confirmed.