The accused was charged with sexual interference, invitation to sexual touching, and sexual assault involving a 14-year-old complainant.
The alleged incidents occurred in the complainant's grandfather's basement where the accused resided.
The court heard evidence from the complainant, his mother, his grandfather, and the accused.
The judge applied principles of reasonable doubt and credibility assessment, including the W.(D.) framework and cautions against sexual offence myths.
While the accused's testimony was found to be incredible, and inconsistencies were noted in the complainant's and his family's evidence, the court ultimately found that the Crown had not proven the essential elements of the charges beyond a reasonable doubt.
The accused was acquitted of all charges.