Unlock 3 more sections of this judge’s background. Start your 7-day free trial.
544 total
Appeal allowed; Tribunal erred in law by improperly interpreting the statutory definition of disability.
The appellant appealed a decision of the Social Benefits Tribunal which upheld the Director's finding that she was not a 'person with a disability' under the Ontario Disability Support Program Act.
The Divisional Court allowed the appeal, finding that the Tribunal erred in law by failing to properly interpret and apply all three subparagraphs of section 4(1) of the Act.
The court held that the Tribunal improperly stopped its analysis after finding no 'substantial' impairment under subparagraph (a), without considering the impact of the impairment on activities of daily living under subparagraph (b).
The matter was remitted for a new hearing.
Applicant and ski club ordered to pay $10,000 in fixed costs following dismissed judicial review.
Following the dismissal of an application for judicial review seeking to quash or adjourn the commencement date of a coroner's inquest, the court determined the issue of costs.
The respondent coroner and the family of the deceased sought costs against the applicant and his employer, a ski club.
The court found the claimed costs excessive but ordered the applicant and the ski club to jointly and severally pay fixed costs of $7,500 to the coroner and $2,500 to the family.
Judicial review of coroner's procedural rulings largely dismissed; coroner's self-initiated conflict of interest inquiry quashed.
The applicant sought judicial review of a coroner's orders refusing to adjourn an upcoming inquest into a fatal ski accident and initiating an inquiry into a potential conflict of interest by the applicant's counsel.
The applicant also sought to remove the coroner based on a reasonable apprehension of bias.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application regarding the adjournment and bias, finding no jurisdictional error or fundamental failure of justice in the coroner's procedural rulings.
However, the court set aside the coroner's order directing the applicant's counsel to disclose information about his retainer, finding the coroner lacked sufficient material to initiate a conflict of interest inquiry on his own motion.