The appellant appealed a decision dismissing its oppression claim regarding the sale of a debtor's assets and the refusal to permit redemption of shares.
The Court of Appeal assumed jurisdiction without deciding the issue.
The Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellant was a participant in the prior receivership proceedings where the sale was approved and chose to take no position.
The proper time and place to protest the unfairness of the sale was during the motion to approve the sale in the receivership proceedings.