Following a complex motion regarding insurance coverage for asbestos claims where the plaintiff was unsuccessful, the successful defendant insurers sought their costs.
The plaintiff argued for a reduction based on divided success on factual issues and refusal to admit facts.
The court rejected the plaintiff's arguments, finding the defendants were the clear winners and their refusal to admit facts was not unreasonable.
The court awarded partial indemnity costs to the defendants, making some reductions to specific bills for duplication of effort among multiple counsel, totaling approximately $546,887.
