84 total
First CMC held for appeals of Mount Dennis Secondary Plan; mediation requested and second CMC scheduled.
This was the first Case Management Conference regarding appeals by multiple developers against the City of Toronto's adoption of Official Plan Amendment No. 571, which adds the Mount Dennis Secondary Plan.
The Tribunal granted participant status to the Learning Enrichment Foundation.
The parties agreed that the matter would benefit from Tribunal-led mediation, and a second Case Management Conference was scheduled for June 2023.
Tribunal consolidates planning appeals and orders City to provide comments and draft Issues List.
The Ontario Land Tribunal held a Case Management Conference regarding appeals for a zoning by-law amendment and an official plan amendment to permit a 42-storey addition on an existing building.
The Tribunal ordered the consolidation of the two appeals.
Additionally, the Tribunal directed the City of Toronto to provide its comments on the revised application and a draft Issues List by specified dates to facilitate the preparation of a Procedural Order for the upcoming merits hearing.
Tribunal grants party status and sets procedural timeline for appeals of Toronto's rail facilities OPA.
The Ontario Land Tribunal held a first Case Management Conference regarding 46 appeals of the City of Toronto's Official Plan Amendment No. 536, which relates to development within the area of influence of rail facilities.
The Tribunal granted party status to seven entities, noted the withdrawal of two appeals in favour of party status, and established a procedural timeline for the submission of consolidated and site-specific issues lists.
A second Case Management Conference was scheduled for December 1, 2022.
Tribunal approves settlement for 29-storey mixed-use development near planned transit station.
The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit a 29-storey mixed-use development.
At a settlement hearing, the parties presented a revised proposal that no longer required an Official Plan Amendment.
Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment was consistent with provincial policy, conformed to the City's Official Plan, and represented good land use planning.
The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part and approved the Zoning By-law Amendment in principle, withholding its final order pending the finalization of the by-law and a Section 37 agreement.