Tyler Peck

The appellant appealed the Town of Oakville Committee of Adjustment's refusal of a minor variance application to facilitate the construction of a two-storey detached dwelling.

The requested variances related to garage floor area, garage projection, dwelling depth, front yard setback, and main wall proportionality.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal and authorized the variances, finding that they satisfied the four tests under section 45(1) of the Planning Act.

The Tribunal accepted the expert planning evidence that the proposed development was compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood and would not create unacceptable adverse impacts.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's neglect to make a decision on a Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 26-storey rental apartment building.

Following a settlement hearing and based on uncontested land use planning evidence, the Ontario Land Tribunal allowed the appeal in part.

The Tribunal approved the redevelopment in principle and, after being advised that all pre-conditions were satisfied, ordered the amendment of Zoning By-law 569-2013.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications to permit a mixed-use development with 33- and 44-storey towers.

The parties reached a settlement modifying the proposal.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised proposal consistent with provincial policies and the City's Official Plan.

The appeals were allowed in part and the planning instruments were approved in principle, with the final order withheld pending fulfillment of specified conditions.

The applicant appealed the City's failure to make a decision on a Zoning By-law amendment application to permit a 26-storey rental apartment building.

Prior to the merit hearing, the parties reached a settlement for a revised 22-storey building.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, in conformity with the Growth Plan and the City's Official Plan, and representative of good planning.

The appeal was allowed in part, with the final order withheld pending the satisfaction of several conditions.

The applicants appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a zoning by-law amendment application to permit a mixed-use development at 301-319 King Street West.

The parties reached a settlement for a 50-storey building that integrates existing heritage facades.

Based on uncontroverted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed development consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, in conformity with the Growth Plan and the City's Official Plan, and representative of good planning.

The appeal was allowed in part, and the zoning by-law was amended accordingly.