The moving parties sought leave to appeal an order dismissing their appeal from a Master's decision.
The Master had dismissed their motion for a further and better affidavit of documents from the defendant accounting firm, limiting the scope of relevant documents to those relating to the fraud identified in a forensic auditor's report.
The Divisional Court denied leave to appeal, finding no reason to doubt the correctness of the motion judge's order regarding relevance.
Although the motion judge erred in applying an overly restrictive standard of review, this error had no impact on the outcome.
