Timothy W. Sargeant

The applicant, United Steelworkers of America, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party, Concord Elevator Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave for the application to be withdrawn.

The parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The Board consented to the adjournment, noting that the matter would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed within that time.

The applicant and responding party agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the application will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of employees at the responding party's workplace.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant municipality brought an application under the Public Sector Labour Relations Transition Act, 1997.

Following a run-off representation vote, a majority of employees in the bargaining unit voted in favour of CUPE Local 3405.

The Board terminated the bargaining rights of IWA Canada Local 2693 and appointed CUPE Local 3405 as the bargaining agent for the unit.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote directed by the Board, not more than 50% of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application for certification and directed the parties to section 10 of the Labour Relations Act regarding any future applications.

The applicant appealed an Employment Standards Officer's assessment regarding unpaid wages and overtime.

The applicant argued that her time cards were altered, she did not receive 15-minute unpaid breaks, and a room and board refund should not be considered wages.

The Board found that the time cards were altered and the applicant did not receive breaks, adding hours to her assessment.

However, the Board agreed with the Officer that the room and board refund fell within the definition of wages.

The employer was ordered to pay the applicant $275.48 in unpaid wages and vacation pay.

The applicant union sought leave to withdraw its application for certification after a hearing was held but before a decision was issued.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant union brought an application under subsection 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, seeking a declaration that multiple Hydro One corporate entities constitute a single employer.

Upon a review of the pleadings, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the application and declared the responding entities to be one employer for the purposes of the Act.

The applicant union applied for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application for certification and directed the parties to section 10 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 regarding future applications.

The applicant applied under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that the responding party trade union no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit.

The responding party failed to file a response within the stipulated time.

The Board found the application timely and that not less than forty per cent of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the trade union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

The applicant trade union applied for certification.

The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board found that the applicant established sufficient membership support in its proposed bargaining unit to obtain a representation vote.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with ballots cast by individuals in disputed 'Lead Hand' positions to be segregated.

The applicant trade union applied for certification of a tag end unit consisting of professional student services personnel employed as librarians by the responding school board.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with segregated ballots for any individuals whose inclusion in the unit is disputed.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification for employees currently represented by the intervenor union.

The Board found that the applicant established sufficient membership support in its proposed bargaining unit to obtain a representation vote.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees to determine whether they wish to be represented by the applicant or the intervenor.

The applicant sought to withdraw the application against the responding party union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The Minister of Labour referred a question to the Ontario Labour Relations Board asking whether the Community Living Association (Lanark County) is a 'hospital' within the meaning of the Hospital Labour Disputes Arbitration Act.

The employer operates group homes for individuals with severe developmental disabilities who require 24-hour supervision and care.

The Board concluded that the services provided by the employer involve the observation, care, or treatment of persons affected with physical or mental illness.

The Board advised the Minister that the employer is a hospital within the meaning of the Act.

The applicant employer sought a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director to be disbursed in accordance with the settlement, with $4,000 paid to the employee, $150 returned to the employer, and the $915 administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

At the scheduled hearing, the parties agreed to adjourn the matters.

The Board rescheduled the hearing for July 19 and 20, 2001, on consent of the parties.

The applicant, United Steelworkers of America, brought a successor rights application under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act.

The Board declared that CAW Local 448 acquired the rights, privileges, and status of its predecessor, Retail Wholesale Canada, Canadian Service Sector Division of the United Steelworkers of America, Local 448, by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.

The applicant employer sought a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

Following a hearing, the workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Board issued an order directing the disbursement of funds held in trust by the Director in accordance with the settlement, paying $1,600 to the employee, returning $561.63 to the employer, and retaining a $216.16 administration fee.