Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant sought to withdraw her application against the responding party union.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
The applicants sought to withdraw their application against the responding party union.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding employers.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding parties.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Union certified as bargaining agent following a successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit of employees at GFI Control Systems Inc.
Union certification granted following a successful representation vote.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate and directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Union certification application dismissed after failing to secure majority support in representation vote.
A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.
As a result, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application for certification and directed the destruction of the ballots.
Board directs applicant to provide submissions on jurisdiction where responding party claims federal regulation.
The applicant filed an application under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The responding party asserted that the Board lacked jurisdiction because its labour relations are federally regulated under the Canada Labour Code.
The Board directed the applicant to provide a detailed statement of material facts supporting provincial jurisdiction within five days, failing which the application would be deemed dismissed.
Jurisdictional dispute application terminated following a settlement between the parties.
The applicant union brought an application concerning a jurisdictional dispute under section 99 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The parties reached a settlement.
Consequently, the Board amended the style of cause to reflect the correct name of the responding employer and terminated the file.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of Westco Security Services Corporation.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Uncontested application for related employer declaration under section 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act granted.
The applicant union filed an application seeking a declaration that several Hydro One entities are related employers under section 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
No responses were filed by the responding parties.
Having regard to the uncontested materials, the Board granted the application and declared the entities to be one employer for the purposes of the Act.
Union certified as bargaining agent following successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for employees of the responding party.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union and defined the appropriate bargaining unit.
A certificate was ordered to issue.
Union certification application dismissed after representation vote failed to achieve majority support.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
A representation vote was held, but not more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.
As no statement of desire to make representations was filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and directed the destruction of the ballots after 30 days.
Union decertified following representation vote where majority opposed continued representation.
The applicant filed an application for termination of bargaining rights.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the responding party union, and with no statement of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the employer.
Representation vote directed in termination application with ballot box sealed pending status disputes.
The applicant applied under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration terminating the responding party union's bargaining rights.
The union argued the application was untimely and that the applicant was not a member of the bargaining unit.
The Board found the application timely as it was filed exactly one year after certification.
Finding that at least forty percent of employees expressed a wish not to be represented by the union, the Board directed a representation vote, with the ballot box to be sealed pending resolution of the status disputes.
Union certified pending final resolution of disputed bargaining unit classifications following successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the WoodGreen Community Centre of Toronto.
The parties agreed on the bargaining unit description, except for two positions.
A representation vote was held, and more than fifty percent of the ballots cast were in favour of the union, regardless of the outcome of the disputed positions.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board exercised its discretion under section 9(2) of the Labour Relations Act to certify the union pending the final resolution of the composition of the bargaining unit.
Representation vote directed in union certification application after employer failed to file a response.
The applicant trade union applied for certification.
The responding party employer failed to file a response within the stipulated time.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union at the time the application was made.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.
Union certification granted for school bus drivers following a successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent school bus drivers employed by the responding party.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Request for reconsideration of decision directing representation vote dismissed.
The Ontario Public Service Employees Union (OPSEU) requested reconsideration of a Board decision directing a representation vote between OPSEU and CUPE following a sale of a business.
OPSEU argued the decision was inconsistent with another recent Board decision where no vote was ordered despite similar union support levels.
The Board distinguished the cases based on the origins of the minority union's representation rights and dismissed the request for reconsideration.