Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 29, 2012

Request to defer human rights application pending Employment Standards Act claim denied.

The respondent requested that the human rights application be deferred pending the outcome of the applicant's claim under the Employment Standards Act for termination and vacation pay.

The applicant opposed the deferral, arguing that the ESA claim did not raise human rights issues.

The Tribunal denied the deferral request, finding a lack of significant overlap between the two processes and noting that any ESA award could be factored into a Tribunal order if appropriate.

Kirk Grasley v. Sealtac Flat Roof Restorations Inc., 2012 HRTO 644

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 28, 2012

Human rights application to proceed after related union grievance was withdrawn.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the applicant had also filed a union grievance concerning the same subject matter.

After receiving submissions, the Tribunal was informed that the union had withdrawn the grievance.

Consequently, the Tribunal found no ongoing proceeding to defer to and ordered the application to proceed.

Wilbur Nixon v. The Good Neighbours’ Club and Lauro Monteiro, 2012 HRTO 642

Jonathan Dye

8 cases2012–2016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 26, 2012

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as unpardoned criminal conviction is not a protected ground.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of 'record of offences' and reprisal after being terminated by the respondent.

The Tribunal found it lacked jurisdiction because the applicant had not received a pardon for his criminal conviction, meaning he did not fall within the Code's definition of 'record of offences'.

Furthermore, the applicant did not allege any facts constituting reprisal as defined in the Code.

The application was dismissed.

John Rolph v. Home Depot of Canada Inc., 2012 HRTO 624

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 23, 2012

Three respondents removed from human rights application; remaining non-responding party ordered to file response.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in housing.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal removed three individual respondents at the applicant's request or due to an inability to provide a valid address.

The Tribunal also directed one remaining individual respondent, who had failed to file a response, to do so by a specified date or risk the Tribunal proceeding without further notice to him under Rule 5.5.

Mondor v. Peterborough Housing Corporation, 2012 HRTO 607

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 23, 2012

Human rights application against Health Canada dismissed for lack of provincial jurisdiction.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code alleging employment discrimination on the basis of sex and age against Health Canada and one of its directors.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed because the issues fall within exclusive federal jurisdiction.

The Tribunal agreed, finding that Health Canada is a federal department and not provincially-regulated.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Michel St-Pierre v. Health Canada, First Nations Inuit Health Branch and Mike Lovett, 2012 HRTO 606

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 22, 2012

Personal respondent given 10 days to file a Response to human rights application.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the corporate and personal respondents.

The corporate respondent filed a Response, but the personal respondent failed to do so.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the personal respondent of the consequences of failing to participate and granting him 10 days to file a Response and explain the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice.

Linda Duhault v. Gap (Canada) Inc. and Anthony Khan, 2012 HRTO 599

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 22, 2012

Tribunal confirms provincial jurisdiction over employment discrimination application against native child welfare agency.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of race.

The Tribunal requested submissions on whether it had jurisdiction, noting the respondent's employment relations might be federally regulated.

Both parties and the Canadian Human Rights Commission indicated that, based on the Supreme Court of Canada's functional test, the respondent's labour relations fall under provincial jurisdiction.

The Tribunal concluded it has jurisdiction and directed the respondent to file its response.

Samuel Pervais v. Dilico Anishinabek Family Care, 2012 HRTO 597

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 21, 2012

Tribunal grants respondent final 10-day extension to file Response before proceeding without notice.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the deadline set in the Notice of Application.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to participate under Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Procedure, and granted the respondent a final 10 days to file a Response and explain the delay before proceeding without further notice.

Howard v. Crystal Balson, 2012 HRTO 587

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 20, 2012

Two human rights applications involving overlapping facts and respondents consolidated on consent.

The applicants, a mother and daughter, filed separate human rights applications involving overlapping factual situations and respondents.

Following a direction from the Tribunal, all parties consented to consolidating the applications.

Applying the factors from Lattey v. Canadian Pacific Railway and Rule 1.7(d) of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal ordered the files consolidated.

Baldini v. 1022403 Ontario Limited, 2012 HRTO 575

Tribunal grants withdrawal against City of Toronto and issues procedural directions for remaining taxi respondents.

The applicant brought multiple human rights applications against various taxi companies and the City of Toronto.

During a teleconference hearing to address preliminary issues, the applicant withdrew her allegations against the City of Toronto.

The Tribunal granted the withdrawal and issued directions regarding the representation of a non-participating respondent, the potential consolidation of the applications, and the scheduling of a further hearing to determine whether an additional corporate respondent should be added.

Di Virgilio v. 1210670 Ontario Inc., 2012 HRTO 571

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 19, 2012

Extension of time granted to file response; applicant reminded of implied undertaking rule.

The applicant requested an extension of time to deliver his Response to the respondents' Request for an Order During Proceedings, as he did not receive the Tribunal's previous interim decision until after the deadline had passed.

The Tribunal granted the extension and reminded the applicant of his obligation under Rule 3.3 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure not to use or disseminate documents obtained from the respondents for any purpose other than the proceeding.

David Vizcaya v. UJA Federation of Greater Toronto and Doron Horowitz, 2012 HRTO 558

Craig Lawrence

8 cases2011–2024

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 15, 2012

Human rights application dismissed under s. 45.1 because an employment standards proceeding already dealt with the substance.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of sex, claiming constructive dismissal upon her return from maternity leave.

Prior to this, she had filed an employment standards claim based on the same facts, which an Employment Standards Officer dismissed.

The respondent requested early dismissal of the human rights application under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found that the employment standards proceeding had appropriately dealt with the substance of the application and, applying the Supreme Court's decision in Figliola, dismissed the application to prevent duplicative proceedings.

Jennifer Pinheiro v. Maritz Canada Inc., 2012 HRTO 540

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 14, 2012

Tribunal declines to defer human rights application due to uncertainty and delay in concurrent grievance proceedings.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the applicant's union had also filed a grievance based on the same facts.

The respondent supported deferral, while the applicant and the union opposed it, noting that the respondent was challenging the jurisdiction of the arbitrator and that an unfair labour practice complaint was pending before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Tribunal declined to defer the application, finding that the uncertainty of the outcome of the concurrent proceedings and the resulting delay meant deferral would not be fair, just, or expeditious.

Robert MacLaren v. Town of Arnprior, 2012 HRTO 536

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 8, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend summary hearing.

The Tribunal convened a summary hearing by teleconference to determine whether the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant failed to attend the hearing despite receiving proper notice.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Meenu Rathore v. Canadian Tire o/a Jakubow Enterprises, 2012 HRTO 495

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 6, 2012

Tribunal extends time limit for respondent's late document production where applicant alleged no prejudice.

The respondent brought a Request for an Order During Proceeding seeking permission to rely on documents produced after the deadline set out in Rule 16.1 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The applicant had objected to the late production but did not file a Response to the Request or allege prejudice.

The Tribunal exercised its discretion under Rule 1.7 to extend the time limit from 21 days to 40 days, deeming the respondent in compliance with Rule 16.1.

Krzysztof Bednarski v. Naka Sales Limited, 2012 HRTO 465

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 1, 2012

Tribunal issues interim order directing applicant to comply with implied undertaking rule regarding disclosed documents.

The respondents requested an urgent order directing the applicant to cease and desist from violating Rule 3.3 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, alleging the applicant used disclosed documents to send a letter to an affiliated agency and threatened to go to the wider community.

The Tribunal abridged the time for the applicant to file a response and issued an interim order directing the applicant to comply with Rule 3.3 and not disclose any material provided by the respondents, cautioning that a breach could amount to an abuse of process resulting in dismissal of the application.

David Vizcaya v. UJA Federation of Greater Toronto and Doron Horowitz, 2012 HRTO 447

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 28, 2012

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as alleged reprisal was not based on Code rights.

The applicant filed an application alleging reprisal in employment, claiming she was terminated after advising she would file a workplace harassment complaint under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (Bill 168).

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The Tribunal found that the alleged bullying was unrelated to any Code ground, and the threatened complaint was under the OHSA, not the Code.

As the applicant was not claiming or enforcing a right under the Code, the Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction.

Suzanne Adams v. Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Cornwall & District, 2012 HRTO 418

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 27, 2012

Corporate respondent deemed to have waived participation rights after failing to file a response.

The applicant filed an application alleging age discrimination in housing.

The corporate respondent, Havcare Investments Inc., failed to file a response despite being directed to do so in previous interim decisions.

The Tribunal applied Rule 5.5 of its Rules of Procedure and deemed the corporate respondent to have waived all rights to further notice or participation in the proceeding.

The matter will proceed to an in-person hearing without the corporate respondent's participation.

A.B. v. Havcare Investments Inc., 2012 HRTO 409

Thomas Stefaniak

1 case2012–2012

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 27, 2012

Tribunal scheduled a preliminary hearing to determine if WSIB proceedings preclude a human rights application.

The respondent requested an order to dismiss the human rights application under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) had already fully determined the issue of available work and accommodation.

The applicant opposed the request, asserting the WSIB did not deal with the substance of the discrimination claim.

The Tribunal noted the application raised significant issues regarding the interpretation of section 45.1 in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Figliola, and scheduled a preliminary hearing to hear oral submissions on the issue.

Maxwell v. Cooper-Standard Automotive Canada Limited, 2012 HRTO 399

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 23, 2012

Respondent deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a response.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The respondent failed to file a response, even after a previous interim decision ordered it to do so.

Applying Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal deemed the respondent to have accepted all allegations in the application and waived its right to further notice or participation.

The Tribunal ordered the matter to proceed to an in-person hearing without the respondent.

Ann-Marie Palmer v. Balsam Lodge, 2012 HRTO 384

Page 27 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 27 of 49 (975 cases)

Naomi Overend

Kirk Grasley v. Sealtac Flat Roof Restorations Inc., 2012 HRTO 644

Naomi Overend

Wilbur Nixon v. The Good Neighbours’ Club and Lauro Monteiro, 2012 HRTO 642

Jonathan Dye

Naomi Overend

John Rolph v. Home Depot of Canada Inc., 2012 HRTO 624

Naomi Overend

Mondor v. Peterborough Housing Corporation, 2012 HRTO 607

Naomi Overend

Michel St-Pierre v. Health Canada, First Nations Inuit Health Branch and Mike Lovett, 2012 HRTO 606

Naomi Overend

Linda Duhault v. Gap (Canada) Inc. and Anthony Khan, 2012 HRTO 599

Naomi Overend

Samuel Pervais v. Dilico Anishinabek Family Care, 2012 HRTO 597

Naomi Overend

Howard v. Crystal Balson, 2012 HRTO 587

Naomi Overend

Baldini v. 1022403 Ontario Limited, 2012 HRTO 575

Rosanne Giulietti

Kingsley Laurin

Carl W. Peterson

Naomi Overend

Di Virgilio v. 1210670 Ontario Inc., 2012 HRTO 571

Naomi Overend

David Vizcaya v. UJA Federation of Greater Toronto and Doron Horowitz, 2012 HRTO 558

Craig Lawrence

Naomi Overend

Jennifer Pinheiro v. Maritz Canada Inc., 2012 HRTO 540

Naomi Overend

Robert MacLaren v. Town of Arnprior, 2012 HRTO 536

Naomi Overend

Meenu Rathore v. Canadian Tire o/a Jakubow Enterprises, 2012 HRTO 495

Naomi Overend

Krzysztof Bednarski v. Naka Sales Limited, 2012 HRTO 465

Naomi Overend

David Vizcaya v. UJA Federation of Greater Toronto and Doron Horowitz, 2012 HRTO 447

Naomi Overend

Suzanne Adams v. Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Cornwall & District, 2012 HRTO 418

Naomi Overend

A.B. v. Havcare Investments Inc., 2012 HRTO 409

Thomas Stefaniak

Naomi Overend

Maxwell v. Cooper-Standard Automotive Canada Limited, 2012 HRTO 399

Naomi Overend

Ann-Marie Palmer v. Balsam Lodge, 2012 HRTO 384

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

for P & H Foods, Respondent

for Pizza Nova

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

for Richard Moon