Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 10, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

A mediation session was scheduled, but the applicant failed to attend and did not communicate with the Tribunal.

The Tribunal subsequently directed the applicant to advise of her intentions, warning that failure to respond could result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant did not respond.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Bendek v. Robinson Solutions Inc., 2012 HRTO 1705

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 10, 2012

Individual respondent deemed to have accepted allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed human rights applications against a university, a union, and several individuals.

One individual respondent failed to file a Response despite multiple directions and warnings from the Tribunal.

Pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal ordered that the non-responding individual is deemed to have accepted all allegations regarding his conduct and waived all rights to further notice or participation in the proceeding.

McCann v. York University, 2012 HRTO 1708

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 10, 2012

Human rights application dismissed on consent following minutes of settlement and withdrawal of allegations.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code against the University of Windsor and Richard Moon.

Pursuant to Minutes of Settlement, the applicant withdrew all allegations of discrimination.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario dismissed the application on consent.

Emily Carasco v. University of Windsor and Richard Moon, 2012 HRTO 1703

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 7, 2012

Request for reconsideration denied as applicant failed to meet threshold criteria and bias allegation lacked merit.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application regarding his failure to be admitted to a vocational training program.

The applicant argued that the decision was wrong and alleged adjudicator bias.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet the threshold criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5, noting that the request was largely a re-argument of the facts and that the bias allegation was factually incorrect and without merit.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

Soujah v. Ability Learning Network, 2012 HRTO 1694

Adjournment request denied as new counsel had sufficient preparation time and work conflict was speculative.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing dates on the basis of a work-related conflict and insufficient preparation time for his newly retained counsel.

The respondent opposed the request.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment, noting that the new counsel had almost three months to prepare and was assisted by a lawyer familiar with the file.

The Tribunal also found the work conflict could potentially be resolved if the hearing concluded early, and directed counsel to be prepared to address the relevance of a proposed witness's evidence.

Katz v. York University, 2012 HRTO 1660

Bay Ryley

41 cases2005–2025

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 31, 2012

Applicant permitted to amend remedies sought; ordered to produce relevant tax assessment documents.

The applicant filed an Application for Contravention of Settlement and subsequently requested to amend her application to increase the remedies sought.

The respondent opposed the amendment and filed a separate request for the production of the applicant's 2010 and 2011 Canada Revenue Agency Notices of Assessment and Reassessment.

The Tribunal granted the applicant's request to amend, noting that the respondent's objections went to the merits rather than prejudice.

The Tribunal also ordered the production of the 2011 tax documents, as they were relevant to whether the applicant received a refund of the withheld settlement funds, but denied the request for the 2010 documents as irrelevant.

Beverly Axworthy v. The Corporation of the Town of Caledon, 2012 HRTO 1661

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 2, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be filed outside the one-year limitation period.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Gregory Antoniow v. S & T Group and Andrew Sario, 2012 HRTO 1516

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 2, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal's status inquiry.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal had previously deferred the application pending the conclusion of ongoing arbitration proceedings.

The Tribunal subsequently wrote to the applicant's counsel requesting an update on the arbitration proceedings, warning that failure to respond might result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant failed to respond.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Howard v. Board of Directors, Halton Condominium Corporation, 2012 HRTO 1517

Frank E. Van Dyke

5 cases2003–2019

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 2, 2012

Human rights application allowed to proceed despite being filed outside the one-year limitation period.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and sex.

A Notice of Intent to Dismiss was issued because the application was filed more than one year after the last alleged incident.

The applicant's counsel explained the delay was due to the applicant attending to her mother's surgery.

The Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the delay was not incurred in good faith and allowed the application to proceed.

Sprager v. Chill Chain Logistics, 2012 HRTO 1519

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 1, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Siemens v. Homes First Society, 2012 HRTO 1497

Rebecca Lee

3 cases2012–2012

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 1, 2012

Union granted leave to intervene in member's human rights application alleging disability discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The applicant's union filed a Request to Intervene.

Noting that a union nearly always has an interest in an application brought by a member of its bargaining unit, and that neither the applicant nor the respondent opposed the request, the Tribunal granted the union leave to intervene.

Dube v. Cargill Value Added Meats, 2012 HRTO 1500

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 1, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal had previously deferred the application pending the conclusion of an ongoing grievance proceeding.

The Tribunal subsequently wrote to the applicant requesting an update on the grievance proceeding and warning that failure to respond could result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant failed to respond to the Tribunal's correspondence.

Consequently, the application was deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Ryan Willison v. Flex-N-Gate Seeburn, 2012 HRTO 1508

David P. Jacobs

6 cases1993–2024

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 1, 2012

Tribunal resolves procedural issues including intervention and summary hearing, and requests submissions on deferral to WSIB.

The applicant alleged discrimination and reprisal regarding a failure to accommodate her disability related to workplace mould exposure.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed several procedural matters.

The Tribunal removed the individual respondent on consent, granted the applicant's union intervenor status, and denied the respondent's request for a summary hearing.

The Tribunal also directed the parties to provide written submissions on whether the application should be deferred pending the outcome of a related WSIB proceeding.

Campbell-Alldis v. Workers Health and Safety Centre, 2012 HRTO 1503

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 1, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be filed outside the one-year limitation period.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice within the required timeframe.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Dwayne Thomas v. Rosedale Transport Limited and David Tonnelli, 2012 HRTO 1502

Rajendra S. Negi

1 case2012–2012

Ann Burke

13 cases1990–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 31, 2012

Tribunal partially grants applicant's request for document production in employment discrimination case.

The applicant in a human rights proceeding alleging age and gender discrimination in employment filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking extensive production of documents from the respondents.

The Tribunal reviewed the nine categories of requested documents, which included student evaluations, resumes of other faculty members, and hiring policies.

The Tribunal granted the request for documents regarding hiring policies, mandatory use of student evaluations, and a specific apology email, but denied or deferred the requests for student evaluations, faculty resumes, and faculty demographic information on the basis of relevance and proportionality.

Wasi Khan v. Seneca College of Applied Art and Technology and Karen Murkar, 2012 HRTO 1484

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 31, 2012

Tribunal removes individual respondents on consent and orders remaining respondents to file full responses.

In an interim decision concerning two consolidated human rights applications, the Tribunal addressed several procedural issues.

The Tribunal granted the respondents' request, on consent, to remove four individually-named respondents from the first application to avoid unnecessary naming of personal respondents.

The Tribunal also directed one individual respondent, who had failed to file a response and whose mail was returned, to update his contact information and file a response within two weeks, warning of consequences under Rule 5.5.

Finally, the Tribunal directed another individual respondent to file a full response, rejecting his request for dismissal based on a parallel civil claim, as the civil claim was for defamation rather than a human rights violation.

McCann v. York University, 2012 HRTO 1493

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 30, 2012

Human rights applications dismissed as abandoned after applicants failed to respond to Tribunal inquiries.

The applicants filed human rights applications which were deferred pending the conclusion of related Landlord and Tenant Board proceedings.

The Tribunal subsequently wrote to the applicants requesting an update on the status of the board proceedings and warning that failure to respond could result in dismissal.

The applicants failed to respond to the Tribunal's inquiry.

Consequently, the applications were deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Weller v. Calvert, 2012 HRTO 1482

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 25, 2012

Request for reconsideration of reprisal application dismissal denied for failing to meet threshold criteria.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his reprisal application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant argued the decision conflicted with established case law and that the adjudicator was biased for not allowing cross-examination.

The Tribunal found the applicant failed to meet the threshold criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26, noting that reconsideration is not an appeal and no determinative new facts were presented.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

Khan v. Seneca College of Applied Arts and Technology, 2012 HRTO 1458

Raj Anand

54 cases1981–2017

Mary Eberts

In Private Practice31 cases1981–2023

Freya Kristjanson

32 cases1995–2016

Amanda Darrach

23 cases2009–2019

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 25, 2012

Tribunal deferred ruling on Wigmore privilege over search committee documents until after applicant's case-in-chief.

The applicant, who was unsuccessful in her bid to become Dean of the University of Windsor Law School, brought requests for the production of unredacted search committee documents.

The University opposed production, claiming privilege under the Wigmore test.

Given the proximity to the hearing and the need for evidence to assess the privilege claim, the Tribunal deferred the determination of the privilege issue until after the applicant's case-in-chief.

The Tribunal also granted the individual respondent's request to seal certain documents pending the resolution of the privilege issue.

Carasco v. University of Windsor, 2012 HRTO 1451

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 24, 2012

Request for reconsideration of human rights decision denied for failing to meet threshold criteria.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that found she was subjected to sexual harassment by her commercial landlord but did not find that the lease ended for Code-related reasons.

The applicant argued the decision conflicted with established case law and that other facts outweighed the public interest in finality.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding the applicant failed to establish any threshold criteria under Rule 26 and was improperly attempting to appeal the decision and increase damages.

Candice Jensen v. Lucijan Ulanowicz, 2012 HRTO 1441

Page 23 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 23 of 49 (975 cases)

Naomi Overend

Bendek v. Robinson Solutions Inc., 2012 HRTO 1705

Naomi Overend

McCann v. York University, 2012 HRTO 1708

Naomi Overend

Emily Carasco v. University of Windsor and Richard Moon, 2012 HRTO 1703

Naomi Overend

Soujah v. Ability Learning Network, 2012 HRTO 1694

Ronald G. Slaght

Paul N. Feldman

Naomi Overend

Katz v. York University, 2012 HRTO 1660

Bay Ryley

Naomi Overend

Beverly Axworthy v. The Corporation of the Town of Caledon, 2012 HRTO 1661

Naomi Overend

Gregory Antoniow v. S & T Group and Andrew Sario, 2012 HRTO 1516

Naomi Overend

Howard v. Board of Directors, Halton Condominium Corporation, 2012 HRTO 1517

Frank E. Van Dyke

Naomi Overend

Sprager v. Chill Chain Logistics, 2012 HRTO 1519

Naomi Overend

Siemens v. Homes First Society, 2012 HRTO 1497

Rebecca Lee

Naomi Overend

Dube v. Cargill Value Added Meats, 2012 HRTO 1500

Naomi Overend

Ryan Willison v. Flex-N-Gate Seeburn, 2012 HRTO 1508

David P. Jacobs

Naomi Overend

Campbell-Alldis v. Workers Health and Safety Centre, 2012 HRTO 1503

Naomi Overend

Dwayne Thomas v. Rosedale Transport Limited and David Tonnelli, 2012 HRTO 1502

Rajendra S. Negi

Ann Burke

Naomi Overend

Wasi Khan v. Seneca College of Applied Art and Technology and Karen Murkar, 2012 HRTO 1484

Naomi Overend

McCann v. York University, 2012 HRTO 1493

Naomi Overend

Weller v. Calvert, 2012 HRTO 1482

Naomi Overend

Khan v. Seneca College of Applied Arts and Technology, 2012 HRTO 1458

Raj Anand

Mary Eberts

Freya Kristjanson

Amanda Darrach

Naomi Overend

Carasco v. University of Windsor, 2012 HRTO 1451

Naomi Overend

Candice Jensen v. Lucijan Ulanowicz, 2012 HRTO 1441

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras