Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 19, 2017

Reconsideration request dismissed for being out of time and failing to meet the required grounds.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision dismissing her application.

The request was filed more than 10 months after the decision, well beyond the 30-day limit under Rule 26.1, without a good faith explanation for the delay.

The applicant sought to introduce documents that were not new or previously unavailable and argued that the Tribunal misinterpreted the evidence.

The Tribunal found no compelling or extraordinary circumstances to justify reconsideration and dismissed the request.

Silverberg v. Lau, 2017 HRTO 1676

Reconsideration granted on consent after application was mistakenly dismissed due to unrecorded extension.

The applicant filed a Request for Reconsideration of a decision that dismissed his application as abandoned for failing to comply with pre-hearing disclosure requirements.

The adjudicator discovered that an extension had previously been granted but not recorded in the file.

The respondent consented to the reconsideration.

The Tribunal granted the Request for Reconsideration and ordered the matter to proceed to mediation or hearing.

Jim Brigis v. Niagara Regional Police, 2017 HRTO 1649

Bettina Burgess

4 cases2012–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 27, 2017

Human rights application dismissed as abuse of process after applicant settled but failed to withdraw.

The applicant and respondent entered into Minutes of Settlement requiring the applicant to withdraw his human rights application.

The applicant received the settlement funds but failed to withdraw the application or communicate with his representative or the Tribunal.

After the applicant failed to attend a scheduled teleconference, the Tribunal found that proceeding with the matter would be an abuse of process and dismissed the application.

Mark Belen v. Conestoga Cold Storage, 2017 HRTO 1561

Adrian Jakibchuk

5 cases2015–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 31, 2017

Application for disability discrimination dismissed; termination was based on performance issues and dishonesty.

The applicant, a security guard, alleged that his employment was terminated because of his disability after he requested a workplace accommodation for a back problem.

The respondent maintained that the termination was due to a culminating incident involving a car accident with a company vehicle and subsequent dishonesty, following a history of performance issues.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to establish that his disability was a factor in the termination, accepting the respondent's non-discriminatory explanation for the dismissal.

Youssef v. Gemstar Security Services Ltd., 2017 HRTO 1434

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 6, 2017

Application dismissed as abandoned due to failure to comply with procedural directions.

The applicant failed to comply with the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure and a Case Assessment Direction requiring the production of documents, witness lists, and witness statements.

The applicant did not file the required materials or communicate with the Tribunal by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned and cancelled the scheduled hearing.

Brigis v. Niagara Regional Police, 2017 HRTO 1324

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 2, 2017

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to comply with document disclosure directions.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Hearing and a subsequent Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to disclose documents, provide a witness list, and submit witness statements by specified deadlines.

The applicant was warned that failure to comply could result in the application being dismissed as abandoned.

The applicant failed to file the required materials or communicate with the Tribunal.

As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned and cancelled the scheduled hearing.

Anderson v. Participation House Brantford, 2017 HRTO 1294

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 29, 2017

Respondent deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed an Application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability.

The respondent failed to file a Response despite receiving a Notice of Application and a subsequent warning letter from the Tribunal.

Pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal ordered that the respondent is deemed to have accepted all allegations in the Application and waived all rights to notice or participation in the proceedings.

A case management conference call was scheduled to determine next steps.

Mark Belen v. Conestoga Cold Storage, 2017 HRTO 1284

Lynette D’Souza

17 cases2013–2017

Adam Guy

Not Practising Law - Employed11 cases2013–2019

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 20, 2017

Human rights applications against OIPRD dismissed due to adjudicative immunity and limitation period expiry.

The applicants filed human rights applications against the Halton Police Services Board, a police detective, the Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD), and the Independent Police Review Director.

The applications alleged discrimination in the execution of a search warrant and in the OIPRD's subsequent investigation and dismissal of their complaints.

The Tribunal held that the OIPRD and its Director are statutory decision-makers protected by adjudicative immunity, depriving the Tribunal of jurisdiction to review their findings.

The Tribunal also refused to permit new allegations regarding the OIPRD investigation process, as they were raised outside the one-year limitation period without a good faith explanation for the delay.

The applications against the OIPRD and its Director were dismissed.

Barton v. Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board, 2017 HRTO 1238

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 6, 2017

Request for reconsideration of application dismissed for delay denied as applicant failed to address delay.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application for delay.

The applicant argued that the interview process used by the respondent was unfair, but failed to address the issue of delay.

The Tribunal found no other factors outweighing the public interest in the finality of decisions and dismissed the request for reconsideration.

Zimmerman v. Ontario (Natural Resources & Forestry), 2017 HRTO 1154

Ron Franklin

23 cases2009–2026

John-Paul Alexandrowicz

In Private Practice32 cases1998–2017

Amanda Lawrence-Patel

1 case2017–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 1, 2017

Request to add personal respondent denied where organizational respondent acknowledged liability for the individual's actions.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceeding to amend her human rights application to include a subsequent event and to add a personal respondent.

The respondent consented to the addition of the subsequent event but opposed adding the personal respondent.

The Tribunal granted the amendment to add the subsequent event on consent.

Applying the three-part test for adding a respondent, the Tribunal denied the request to add the personal respondent, finding it unnecessary because the organizational respondent acknowledged liability for the individual's actions and the individual's conduct was not central to the allegations as a whole.

Roberta Mazzariol v. London District Catholic School Board, 2017 HRTO 1135

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 31, 2017

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed a human rights application which was deferred pending the conclusion of a grievance proceeding.

After the grievance concluded, the Tribunal directed the applicant to follow the process for reactivating a deferred application and warned that failure to respond could result in dismissal.

The applicant failed to respond to the Tribunal's communications.

Consequently, the application was deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Kelley Maki v. Near North District School Board, 2017 HRTO 1128

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 29, 2017

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to NOID.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) on the basis that the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction, directing the applicant to respond by a specified date.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Eskios v. Toronto Community Housing, 2017 HRTO 1115

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 29, 2017

Application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss on the basis that the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice by the specified deadline.

As a result, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Brent Martin v. Georgian Waste Services/Recycling Specialties and Paul Pickett, 2017 HRTO 1114

Maura Thompson

3 cases2016–2024

Carole G. Jenkins

In Private Practice39 cases2003–2025

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 22, 2016

Human rights application alleging disability discrimination by children's aid societies dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in services on the basis of disability against two children's aid societies.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and found that the respondents' actions in assessing the applicant's mental health and stability were necessary for child protection purposes and not based on discriminatory factors.

The application was dismissed.

D.G. v. Peel Children’s Aid Society, 2016 HRTO 1665

Sean Bawden

1 case2016–2016

Sabatina Vassalli

14 cases2014–2026

Cheryl Ellison

Practising Law - Employed33 cases2007–2025

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 21, 2016

Summary hearing request granted for Ministry but denied for service provider regarding discriminatory discharge testing.

The applicant, a child with autism and secondary disabilities, alleged discrimination in the provision of services after being discharged from an intensive behavioural intervention program.

The respondents, Kinark Child and Family Services and the Ministry of Children and Youth Services, requested a summary hearing to dismiss the application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal dismissed the application against the Ministry, finding no allegations of specific acts that disadvantaged the applicant on the basis of disability.

However, the Tribunal denied Kinark's request to dismiss, as the applicant alleged the testing used for discharge failed to accommodate her secondary disabilities, which required a hearing on the merits to resolve.

C.P. v. Kinark Child and Family Services, 2016 HRTO 1653

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 29, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to comply with procedural directions and indicated disinterest.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code.

Prior to the scheduled hearing, the applicant failed to comply with the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure regarding document exchange and indicated via email that she had no interest in pursuing the matter.

After failing to respond to the Tribunal's directions to either file a formal withdrawal or confirm her intention to proceed, the Tribunal found that the applicant had abandoned the application.

The application was dismissed as abandoned.

Puklicz v. ParaMed Home Health Care, 2016 HRTO 1532

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 25, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID and a subsequent follow-up email.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Shawn Taylor v. Kenex Coatings, 2016 HRTO 1507

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 25, 2016

Individual respondent deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a response.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment.

The individual respondent failed to file a Response despite receiving multiple notices and warnings from the Tribunal regarding the consequences of non-compliance.

Applying Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, the adjudicator deemed the individual respondent to have accepted all allegations against her and waived all rights to further notice or participation in the proceedings.

Gaiane Tonoian v. Angelo’s Unisex Hairstyling, 2016 HRTO 1511

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 25, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to file required reply and submissions.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Delivery of Response and Notice of Request to Dismiss, directing the applicant to file a Reply and submissions on the respondents' request to dismiss the application.

The applicant failed to file a Reply or respond to a follow-up letter warning that the application might be dismissed as abandoned.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Shannon Hicks v. London Ale House and Alex Petropoulakis, 2016 HRTO 1506

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 25, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation session and did not respond to subsequent Tribunal correspondence inquiring about their intentions.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

McJannet v. Bayshore Property Management Inc., 2016 HRTO 1513

Page 1 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 1 of 49 (975 cases)

Naomi Overend

Silverberg v. Lau, 2017 HRTO 1676

Woodward B. McKaig

Jennifer Zdriluk

Naomi Overend

Jim Brigis v. Niagara Regional Police, 2017 HRTO 1649

Bettina Burgess

Naomi Overend

Mark Belen v. Conestoga Cold Storage, 2017 HRTO 1561

Adrian Jakibchuk

Naomi Overend

Youssef v. Gemstar Security Services Ltd., 2017 HRTO 1434

Naomi Overend

Brigis v. Niagara Regional Police, 2017 HRTO 1324

Naomi Overend

Anderson v. Participation House Brantford, 2017 HRTO 1294

Naomi Overend

Mark Belen v. Conestoga Cold Storage, 2017 HRTO 1284

Lynette D’Souza

Adam Guy

Naomi Overend

Barton v. Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board, 2017 HRTO 1238

Naomi Overend

Zimmerman v. Ontario (Natural Resources & Forestry), 2017 HRTO 1154

Ron Franklin

John-Paul Alexandrowicz

Amanda Lawrence-Patel

Naomi Overend

Roberta Mazzariol v. London District Catholic School Board, 2017 HRTO 1135

Naomi Overend

Kelley Maki v. Near North District School Board, 2017 HRTO 1128

Naomi Overend

Eskios v. Toronto Community Housing, 2017 HRTO 1115

Naomi Overend

Brent Martin v. Georgian Waste Services/Recycling Specialties and Paul Pickett, 2017 HRTO 1114

Maura Thompson

Carole G. Jenkins

Naomi Overend

D.G. v. Peel Children’s Aid Society, 2016 HRTO 1665

Sean Bawden

Sabatina Vassalli

Cheryl Ellison

Naomi Overend

C.P. v. Kinark Child and Family Services, 2016 HRTO 1653

Naomi Overend

Puklicz v. ParaMed Home Health Care, 2016 HRTO 1532

Naomi Overend

Shawn Taylor v. Kenex Coatings, 2016 HRTO 1507

Naomi Overend

Gaiane Tonoian v. Angelo’s Unisex Hairstyling, 2016 HRTO 1511

Naomi Overend

Shannon Hicks v. London Ale House and Alex Petropoulakis, 2016 HRTO 1506

Naomi Overend

McJannet v. Bayshore Property Management Inc., 2016 HRTO 1513

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.