Marilyn Silverman

The applicant requested an adjournment sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the request and adjourned the application sine die, noting it will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed within that time.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding employer failed to remit benefit contributions and union dues as required by the collective agreement.

The responding employer failed to file a response or notice of intent to defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the Board deemed the employer to have accepted all facts stated in the application.

The Board declared that the employer was bound by the collective agreement and had violated it by failing to make the required remittances.

The issue of damages was deferred to a scheduled oral hearing.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The applicant union referred a grievance to arbitration under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, requesting determination without a hearing as the responding party failed to file a Notice of Intent to Defend.

The applicant also requested a declaration of successor trade union status to Local 597.

The Board declined to grant default judgment, noting that a separate application concerning successor status was pending before another panel, and jurisdiction over the job site lay with Local 597.

The matter was deferred to a scheduled hearing.

The employer requested an adjournment of an employment standards matter scheduled for October 5, 2000, citing professional schedule disruptions and inconvenience to witnesses.

The applicant opposed the request.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board denied the adjournment, noting that it generally does not adjourn matters without consent and that no compelling reason was provided.

The responding party requested an adjournment of an employment standards appeal hearing because a key witness, the applicant's former supervisor, had a scheduled overseas vacation.

The applicant opposed the request due to the delay.

The Board found the request reasonable as it was made promptly and the responding party agreed to an early rescheduling.

The Board granted the adjournment, giving the applicant the option to either begin the hearing on the scheduled date without the witness or reschedule to one of three specified dates.

The applicant employer applied for a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director to be disbursed in accordance with the settlement, with $2,048.89 paid to the employer, $2,048.89 paid to the employee, and the administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

The applicant requested confirmation of posting of notices by the responding parties, and the responding parties requested an extension of time to file their responses.

The Board granted the extension of time for 5 days and directed the responding parties to immediately post the required notices and file the completed Form A-26.

The applicants requested to withdraw their applications against the Ontario Secondary School Teachers Federation and the District School Board Ontario North East.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the applications were withdrawn.

The applicant filed an employment standards complaint directly with the Ontario Labour Relations Board against her employer, A&W Restaurants.

The Board found that the complaint had never been brought to the Ministry of Labour and no Employment Standards Officer had issued or refused to issue an order.

As there was no decision to appeal, the Board determined it had no jurisdiction to consider the matter and terminated the application.

The applicant employer applied for a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director to be disbursed in accordance with the settlement, with $1,600 paid to the employee, $197.92 returned to the employer, and the administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

The applicant employer applied for review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Board ordered the disbursement of the funds held in trust by the Director in accordance with the settlement, with $5,000 paid to the employee, $4,976.93 returned to the employer, and the administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

The employer applied for a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director to be disbursed according to the settlement, with $1,525.00 to the employee, $573.70 returned to the employer, and the administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

The applicant requested to withdraw the matter.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the matter was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant employer applied under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act to review an Order to Pay.

The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director to be disbursed according to the settlement, with $5,000 paid to the employee, $4,976.93 returned to the employer, and the administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

The matter was deemed terminated subject to any request by the Ministry of Labour to relist.

The applicant filed an employment standards application against the responding parties.

The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

Having regard to the settlement, the Ontario Labour Relations Board terminated the matter.

The applicant employer sought a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Board ordered the disbursement of the funds held in trust, with $916.40 returned to the employer, $550.00 paid to the employee, and the $146.64 administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

The applicant filed an employment standards application against the responding parties.

The parties reached an agreement on September 13, 2000.

Having regard to the agreement, the Ontario Labour Relations Board terminated the matter.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding employer failed to remit required benefit contributions and union dues.

The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the Board deemed the facts in the application accepted and found the responding party liable for violating the collective agreement.

A hearing was scheduled to assess the quantum of damages.

The applicant requested an amendment to the certificate to correct the responding party's name.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and ordered that the certificate be amended by inserting the word 'Ontario' after '1278655'.