Who is Kirk Walstedt?

Kirk Walstedt is a vice chair at the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal with 111 decisions on record from 2005 to 2017. Key areas include administrative law, other tribunals, environmental law.

What tribunal does Kirk Walstedt sit on?

Kirk Walstedt sits on the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does Kirk Walstedt decide?

Kirk Walstedt's most common areas include Administrative Law (109 decisions), Other Tribunals (108 decisions), Environmental Law (21 decisions). Kirk Walstedt has handled 111 decisions across 4 areas.

How many decisions has Kirk Walstedt made?

Kirk Walstedt has 111 decisions on record from 2005 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Kirk Walstedt?

Representatives who frequently appear before Kirk Walstedt include Henry Bos, Geoff Spurr, John Kuntze.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Kirk Walstedt — Vice Chair

Kirk Walstedt

Vice Chair·Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal·Since 2005

111

cases · 13 yrs · OAFRAAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Chair· 67Vice Chair· 15Vice Chair· 15Chair· 4Vice Chair· 3Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1Chair of the Tribunal, Member of this Panel· 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 12, 2011

Drainage assessment appeal denied; engineer's assessment method found compliant with the Drainage Act.

The appellant appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding assessments for the Ross Drain 2004 project under the Drainage Act.

The appellant argued his lands did not benefit from the new tiles and that his assessment should be reduced.

The Tribunal found the engineer's assessment method compliant with the Act and accepted practice, concluding the appellant's lands did benefit from the new tiles and an upstream catch basin.

The appeal was denied, though minor agreed-upon amendments to the engineer's report were ordered.

Ross Drain (RE), 2011 ONAFRAAT 30

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 12, 2011

Consent request for extension of time to file submissions granted.

The Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs requested an extension of time to file submissions regarding the interpretation of the Farm Registration and Farm Organizations Funding Act, 1993 and O. Reg. 723/93, with the consent of the other farm organizations.

The Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal granted the request, amending its previous interim order to extend the deadline for submissions from July 29, 2011, to August 29, 2011.

National Farmers Union Ontario Reaccreditation - Revised Interim Order, 2011 ONAFRAAT 22

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 12, 2011

Consent request for extension of time to file submissions in reaccreditation matter granted.

The Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs requested an extension of time to file submissions regarding the interpretation of the Farm Registration and Farm Organizations Funding Act, 1993 and O. Reg. 723/93 in the context of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture's reaccreditation application.

With the consent of the involved farm organizations, the Tribunal granted the extension, amending its previous interim order to allow submissions to be filed by August 29, 2011.

Ontario Federation of Agriculture (Re), 2011 ONAFRAAT 23

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 12, 2011

Consent request for extension of time to file submissions granted.

The Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs requested an extension of time to file submissions regarding the interpretation of the Farm Registration and Farm Organizations Funding Act, 1993 and Ontario Regulation 723/93 in the context of the Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario's application for reaccreditation.

The request was made with the consent of the involved farm organizations.

The Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal granted the request and extended the deadline for submissions to August 29, 2011.

Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario Reaccreditation, 2011 ONAFRAAT 24

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 11, 2011

Appeal of drainage assessments dismissed; engineer's report and assessment methodology complied with the Drainage Act.

The appellant appealed a decision of the Court of Revision regarding assessments for a municipal drain project initiated by a road authority's petition.

The appellant and another assessed landowner argued the drainage work should have been done privately to save costs, and that the road authority should bear a larger share of the assessment.

The Tribunal found that the municipality and the engineer complied with the Drainage Act in proceeding with the report after receiving a valid petition.

The Tribunal accepted the engineer's methodology for calculating the assessments and dismissed the appeal, confirming the original assessments.

Proctor Drain (Re), 2011 ONAFRAAT 21

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 29, 2011

Tribunal issued interim order requesting submissions on whether statutory payments constitute membership fees for accreditation.

The Ontario Federation of Agriculture applied for renewal of its accreditation under the Farm Registration and Farm Organizations Funding Act, 1993.

Following a hearing, the Tribunal raised concerns regarding the treatment of the payment provided to the Ministry under section 21(1) of the Act as a membership fee, noting discrepancies in statutory language and tax treatment.

The Tribunal issued an interim order inviting submissions from the applicant, other farm organizations, and the Ministry on the proper interpretation of the Act and Regulation before making a final decision.

Ontario Federation of Agriculture Reaccreditation (Re), 2011 ONAFRAAT 19

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 29, 2011

Tribunal issued interim order requesting submissions on whether statutory payments constitute membership fees for accreditation.

The Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario applied for renewal of its accreditation under the Farm Registration and Farm Organizations Funding Act, 1993.

Following a hearing, the Tribunal raised concerns regarding whether the payment provided to the Ministry under section 21(1) of the Act could be treated as a membership fee, noting discrepancies between the Act and the Regulation.

The Tribunal issued an interim order inviting submissions from the applicant, other farm organizations, and the Ministry on the proper interpretation of the legislation before making a final decision.

Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario, 2011 ONAFRAAT 17

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 29, 2011

Tribunal issues interim order requesting submissions on whether statutory payments constitute membership fees for accreditation.

The National Farmers Union - Ontario applied for renewal of its accreditation under the Farm Registration and Farm Organizations Funding Act, 1993.

Following the hearing, the Tribunal raised concerns regarding whether the payment provided to the Ministry under section 21(1) of the Act could be treated as a membership fee, noting apparent contradictions between the Act and Ontario Regulation 723/93.

The Tribunal issued an interim order deferring its final decision and inviting submissions on the proper interpretation of the legislation from the applicant, other accredited farm organizations, and the Ministry.

National Farmers Union Ontario Reaccreditation - Interim Order, 2011 ONAFRAAT 18

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 1, 2011

Tribunal adjusted drainage assessment ratios and ordered a nominal allowance for an existing drain enclosure.

Several landowners appealed the engineer's report and the Court of Revision's decision regarding the Story Drain project under the Drainage Act.

The project involved incorporating an existing private drain enclosure into the municipal drain and replacing a failed section.

The appellants challenged the inclusion of prior engineering costs, the adequacy of allowances for right-of-way and existing drains, the assessment ratios, and the location of the outlet.

The Tribunal ordered a nominal allowance for the existing drain, adjusted the Benefit/Outlet assessment ratios to 60/40, removed a portion of the prior engineering costs, and confirmed the existing outlet location.

Requests for costs were denied.

Story Drain (RE), 2011 ONAFRAAT 14

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 14, 2011

Appeal dismissed; CFO moratorium on out-of-province chicken processing contracts is intra vires provincial marketing authority.

The appellant, an Ontario chicken producer, appealed decisions of the Chicken Farmers of Ontario (CFO) declining his request to revoke a regulation and policy amendment that placed a moratorium on increasing processing contracts with Quebec processors.

The appellant argued the amendments were ultra vires as they controlled interprovincial trade.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the pith and substance of the impugned instruments was the regulation of chicken marketing transactions within Ontario, which falls squarely within the CFO's delegated authority under the Farm Products Marketing Act.

Henry Bos v. Chicken Farmers Of Ontario, 2011 ONAFRAAT 12

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 4, 2011

Drainage assessments upheld; engineer's use of a 38mm drainage coefficient was appropriate and professionally sound.

Several landowners appealed their assessments under the Drainage Act for the Moon Drain 2010, seeking a 12% reduction.

They argued the Engineer showed favouritism to one landowner by designing the drain with a 38mm drainage coefficient instead of a 25mm coefficient, which increased costs.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding that the Engineer acted independently and that the 38mm coefficient was appropriate for a system allowing direct surface water entry, consistent with the Drainage Guide for Ontario.

Moon Drain (Re), 2011 ONAFRAAT 11

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 3, 2011

Association of Ontario Chicken Processors denied full party status but granted intervenor status in appeal.

The Association of Ontario Chicken Processors (AOCP) requested full party status in an ongoing appeal by a chicken producer challenging a regulatory moratorium imposed by the Chicken Farmers of Ontario.

The Tribunal considered the common law principles of intervention and determined that granting full party status on the eve of the hearing would be unfair to the existing parties.

However, recognizing AOCP's sufficient interest in the subject matter, the Tribunal granted AOCP intervenor status to make submissions as a friend of the court.

Henry Bos v. Chicken Farmers of Ontario, 2011 ONAFRAAT 9

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 4, 2011

Appeal denied; marketing board had authority to eliminate tobacco production quotas and implement licensing system.

The appellant, a tobacco farming corporation, appealed a decision of the Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers' Marketing Board denying the use of its previous farm licence numbers and a refund for licence fees paid in 2009 and 2010.

The appellant argued that the Board did not have the authority to remove its basic production quota (BPQ) and that the new licensing system improperly limited production.

The Tribunal found that the Board had the absolute authority to remove the BPQ and transition to a licensing system under the Farm Products Marketing Act and its regulations.

The Tribunal also found that the new licensing system did not improperly limit production, as growers could produce as much tobacco as they could secure contracts for.

The appeal was denied, as the Tribunal could not reinstate a quota system that no longer existed.

Gubbels Farms Ltd. v. The Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers’ Marketing Board, 2011 ONAFRAAT 5

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 3, 2011

Engineer's report for municipal drain set aside because it was unsigned and unsealed.

Several landowners appealed the decisions of the Court of Revision regarding the assessments for the Baer Municipal Drain.

At the hearing, the Tribunal discovered that the Engineer's Report adopted by the municipal council and circulated to landowners was neither signed nor sealed by the engineer.

The Tribunal found that the unsigned and unsealed report was not a valid report under the Drainage Act.

Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Engineer's Report, rendering the appeals moot, and directed that the proper statutory process be followed for adopting a new report.

Baer Municipal Drain (Re), 2011 ONAFRAAT 4

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 31, 2011

Appeals from engineer's report and Court of Revision dismissed; municipal drain improvements and assessments upheld.

The appellants appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the repair and improvement of a municipal drain.

The appellants argued that the assessments were too high and that downstream drainage issues should be addressed first.

The Tribunal accepted the engineer's evidence that the proposed work, which included relocating a portion of the drain to follow the natural gradient, was necessary and compliant with the Drainage Act.

The Tribunal found the assessments fair and equitable and dismissed the appeals, while granting the engineer's request to amend the working corridor and corresponding allowances.

Schooley Municipal Drain (Re), 2011 ONAFRAAT 2

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 17, 2010

Appeals from engineer's report and drainage assessment dismissed; proposed drain design and allowances upheld.

The appellants appealed an Engineer's Report and a Court of Revision decision regarding the construction of a new municipal tile drain on their property.

They sought to have the drain diverted to a different watershed, requested changes to the drain's design, argued for increased allowances for land and crop damages, and sought a reduction in their drainage assessment.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, accepting the engineer's evidence that the design was appropriate for the historical watershed, the allowances were fair and equitable, and the assessment methodology conformed with the Drainage Act.

Baird Municipal Drain (RE), 2010 ONAFRAAT 34

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 15, 2010

Tribunal modifies drainage report, ordering municipality and engineer to bear accrued interest and hearing costs.

The Township of Norwich applied to the Tribunal under Section 58(4) of the Drainage Act to modify the Engineer's Report on the Ross Drain 2004.

The modifications were required due to additional tile replacement work and associated costs not included in the original report.

The Tribunal ordered the Municipality to adopt the Engineer's Addendum, directed a Court of Revision for assessment appeals, and held that accrued interest charges and engineering fees for the hearing should be borne by the Municipality and the Engineer, not the assessed landowners, due to delays and unauthorized work.

Ross Drain (Re), 2010 ONAFRAAT 32

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 8, 2010

Engineer's report set aside due to undue influence by municipal council compromising the engineer's independent judgment.

The appellant appealed an Engineer's Report and a decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Miller Drainage Works 1969.

The appellant sought to have the open channel of the drain on his property enclosed, as originally proposed in the Engineer's preliminary report.

The Tribunal found that the municipal council exceeded its jurisdiction by exerting undue influence on the Engineer to change the report's recommendations from a drain enclosure to an access culvert, and that the Engineer failed to exercise independent judgment.

The Tribunal set aside the Report and ordered the municipality to appoint a new Engineer to prepare a final report for the enclosure of the drain.

Rein Minnema v. Municipality of Southwest Middlesex, 2010 ONAFRAAT 31

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 5, 2010

Tribunal refused to hear appeal of 2005 chicken quota policies due to passage of time.

The appellant, a chicken producer, appealed certain 2005 and 2009 policies of the Chicken Farmers of Ontario (CFO) to the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

The CFO brought a preliminary motion to dismiss the portion of the appeal relating to the 2005 policies, arguing the appellant had known of them for more than a year and was not aggrieved by them.

The Tribunal granted the motion, exercising its discretion under s. 16(4) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Act to refuse to hear the appeal of the 2005 policies.

The Tribunal noted the policies were developed through a negotiated process, the industry had relied on them for four years, and the requested change to open contracting would fundamentally alter the assurance of supply system.

Henry Bos v. Chicken Farmers of Ontario, 2010 ONAFRAAT 38

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 28, 2010

Drainage Act appeal denied; Tribunal upholds Engineer's Report and proposed drainage route.

The appellant appealed an Engineer's Report under the Drainage Act, seeking to redirect proposed drainage away from his property to a North Drain, remove his property from the drainage area, and eliminate his assessments.

The Tribunal heard competing expert engineering evidence regarding natural surface water flow and project costs.

The Tribunal accepted the municipal engineer's conclusion that natural overland flow is predominantly from northeast to southwest and that the proposed Drain A option was the most practical solution.

The Tribunal found the appellant's assessments for benefit and outlet to be fair and equitable.

The appeals were denied.

Whelan/Collver Road Drain (Re), 2010 ONAFRAAT 36

Page 2 of 6 (111 cases)

appellant

Henry BosSelf-represented
4 appearances
Dale McFeetersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Alan CunningtonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Carolyn BoyceSelf-represented
1 appearance
David BoyceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Diana HammSelf-represented
1 appearance
Finlay McCormickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fred DaubertSelf-represented
1 appearance
George VanderbekeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gladys DufourSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helmut FunkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeanette JenkinsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim JenkinsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance
John PetropoulosSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph PruynSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith EmmettSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ludmila DejmekSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant

Rein MinnemaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ronald PearsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn ParkinsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance
Kenneth PearsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marian EadieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald EadieSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant and assessed landowner

Jackie OrgarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Louis VargaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea ClemencioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Clifford TattersallSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dave OrgarSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant, and assessed landowner

Robert GregsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant/Landowner

Georges BicrelSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellants

Moira DaubertSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HuardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fred DaubertSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andy HuardSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellants

Rainer PahlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lynne PahlSelf-represented
1 appearance

applicant

John VieraitisSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner

Tony RitolaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne BuchananSelf-represented
1 appearance
William TiessenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andre CartierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Claire GiffinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cliff IvensSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don GiffinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Earl HardingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edwin ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Garry SteeleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Harry KellerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hugh WalkerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jan Van NulandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim SteeleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lew AcreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Liz BuchananSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maggie WahlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marjorie SteeleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Neil BrownSelf-represented
1 appearance

Assessed landowner

Keith ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter SemowoniukSelf-represented
1 appearance

Assessed Landowner

Karen WakemSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ron WakemSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, appellant

Paul BrownSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner in the Elliott Drain watershed

Barbara BalogSelf-represented
1 appearance

Assistant to counsel for Appellant

Curtis CleeverCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the Municipality of North Perth

Andrew OsyanyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the respondent

Geoff SpurrCounsel
3 appearances

counsel for the Town of Kingsville

Ruth Orton-PertCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for Xeltron S.A., respondent

Cheryl BiehlerCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Agricorp

Karin RasmussenCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Agricorp, the respondent

Rebecca GivenCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to John and Susanna Cayer

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Mike Koczycki appellant

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant

John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants

Julian FalconerCounsel
2 appearances
Sunil MathaiCounsel
2 appearances

counsel to the Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Dairy Farmers of Ontario, respondent

Geoffrey SpurCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Ontario Milk Transport Association, appellant

Andrew OsyanyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
2 appearances

counsel to the Township of Perth South

Gerry CullitonCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Township of Kingsville

Perry DunmoreCounsel
1 appearance

Deputy Clerk

Dianne WilsonAgent
1 appearance

Director, Drainage Division for the municipality

Tim DickAgent
1 appearance

Director Physical Services for Municipality

Lloyd PerrinAgent
1 appearance

Director Physical Services for the Municipality

Lloyd PerrinAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for Municipality

Brett RuckAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the City of Port Colborne

Rene LandryAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for the Municipality

Brett RuckAgent
1 appearance
Elizabeth JefferyAgent
1 appearance
Harold HallAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich, respondent

Ralph BeharrellAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the Township of Southwold, assessed landowner

Brent ClutterbuckAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich

Ralph BeharrellAgent
1 appearance

Engineer for the Corporation of the County of Essex, appellant

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

engineer for the municipality

Tim OliverAgent
1 appearance

Engineer for the Report

Bill DietrichAgent
1 appearance

Engineer on behalf of the Municipality

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

Engineer, on behalf of the Municipality

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
John SprietAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the report

Gerard RoodAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report

Jeff DicksonAgent
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the report

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Mike P. DeVosAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the Report

John KuntzeAgent
3 appearances
J.R. (Jeff) DicksonAgent
2 appearances
Gerard RoodAgent
2 appearances
John SprietAgent
1 appearance
Paul SmeltzerAgent
1 appearance
Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance
Raymond DobbinAgent
1 appearance
R.O. (Ray) DobbinAgent
1 appearance
John M. SprietAgent
1 appearance

for all of the appellants

Timothy FlanneryCounsel
1 appearance

for Amico Properties Inc.

Cindy PrinceAgent
1 appearance

for Brian Whelan

Larry PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Brunato Farms Limited, Assessed Landowner

James CookCounsel
1 appearance

for CFO

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Janet CioruchAgent
1 appearance

for CLPA Inc., assessed landowner

Barbara RozakAgent
1 appearance
Tony RozakAgent
1 appearance

for Conestoga Meat Packers/Progressive Pork Producers

Arnold DrungAgent
1 appearance
Bob HunsbergerAgent
1 appearance
Frank DevetAgent
1 appearance

for Conestoga Meat Packers/Progressive Pork Producers (Conestoga 3P)

Arnold DrungAgent
1 appearance
Bob HunsbergerAgent
1 appearance

for Daniel Neufeld, assessed landowner

William NeufeldAgent
2 appearances

for De Wetering Hill Farms

Teresa De WeteringAgent
2 appearances

for Districts 10, 11 and 12 Pork Producers

Bruce HudsonAgent
1 appearance
Rob de WoldeAgent
1 appearance

for Elizabeth Trepanier, assessed landowner

Lawrence TrepanierAgent
1 appearance

for Grant and Sharon Wolfe and Jim Wolfe, Assessed Landowners

M. Paul DownsCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Elaine HeyinkSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself and Eckro Precision

Terry EckertSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Bud KellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Clare HartleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jay MaxnerSelf-represented
1 appearance
John CampbellSelf-represented
1 appearance
William YoungSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself and his brother Ron Jarvis, appellants

Keith JarvisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself, John and Betty Denby, appellants

William (Bill) DenbySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Huron County Pork Producers' Association

Grant LoveAgent
2 appearances
John Vander BurgtAgent
2 appearances

for intervenor, the Association of Ontario Chicken Processors

Herman TurkstraCounsel
1 appearance

for John and Susanna Cayer

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for Kenneth and Lynda Anderson

Dennis H. AsherCounsel
1 appearance

for Maple Leaf Consumer Foods

Cathy AkerAgent
1 appearance
Don DavidsonAgent
1 appearance

for Maple Leaf Consumer Foods (Maple Leaf)

Cathy AkerAgent
1 appearance
Don DavidsonAgent
1 appearance

for Mr. Mitri

G. MeakingsCounsel
1 appearance

for Mr. Schives, the petitioner

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Pork Producers' Marketing Board

Ken OvingtonAgent
1 appearance
Kim MullinCounsel
1 appearance
Wilma JeffrayAgent
1 appearance

for Ontario Pork Producers' Marketing Board (Ontario Pork)

Maryann HendrikxAgent
1 appearance
Ken OvingtonAgent
1 appearance
Sean ForanCounsel
1 appearance
Wilma JeffrayAgent
1 appearance

for Patricia Larkin, assessed landowner

Joseph LarkinAgent
1 appearance

for Pyramid Farms, assessed landowner

Dean TiessenAgent
1 appearance
William TiessenAgent
1 appearance

for Quality Meat Packers

Dan CohoeAgent
2 appearances
Jim GracieAgent
1 appearance

for Rein Minnema

Elbert van DonkersgoedAgent
2 appearances

for respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO)

Graham LloydCounsel
2 appearances

for Sure Fresh Foods Inc.

Andrew HealCounsel
1 appearance
Hank Van VoorstAgent
1 appearance

for Synergy Swine, Paragon Farms, and RFW Farms

James ReesorAgent
1 appearance
Mark YungblutAgent
1 appearance
Rob McDougallAgent
1 appearance

for Synergy Swine, Paragon Farms, and RFW Farms (Synergy et al.)

Mark YungblutAgent
1 appearance
James ReesorAgent
1 appearance
Rob McDougallAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant

Donald GoodCounsel
2 appearances
Carina BruggemanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris MastersonAgent
1 appearance
Damon SrokoszSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance
Jim MastersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John CoxonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Matthew DickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael AllemanoCounsel
1 appearance
Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance
Rick GrimaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sher HelmerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom BradishSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barry CardCounsel
1 appearance
Wayne HartungSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Donald MurneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary ArtsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Max IlandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael LabaCounsel
1 appearance
Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance
Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance
Wilhelm GreisbachSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellant, Frank Pohorly

Steven PohorlyAgent
1 appearance
Susan PohorlyAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant George Vanderbeke

Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance

for the Appellant, Gubbels Farms Ltd.

Jim CaskeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Paul and Nancy Brown

John WiebeAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Ruedel Farms Inc.

John TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants

Cheryl LenehanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Jeannine MillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard MetcalfeAgent
1 appearance
Terry MillerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellants, Wyatt Stetler and 934671 Ontario Limited

Burton TaitCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Alvaro VenturelliUnion representative
1 appearance
Ann SlaterUnion representative
1 appearance
Don MillsUnion representative
1 appearance
John SutherlandUnion representative
1 appearance
Peter DowlingUnion representative
1 appearance

for the CFFO

Lorne SmallAgent
2 appearances
Henry StevensAgent
1 appearance
John ClementAgent
1 appearance
Gerald PoechmanAgent
1 appearance
Nathan StevensAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Port Colborne, respondent

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the County of Elgin, the appellant

Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance

for the Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Alex HamiltonAgent
1 appearance
Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance
Ross CrawfordAgent
1 appearance

for the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs

Kristopher Crawford-DickinsonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Municipality

Janet McGuigan-KellyCounsel
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Ruth OrtonCounsel
1 appearance
Ruth Orton-PertCounsel
1 appearance
Steven ShoemakerCounsel
1 appearance
Wray RamsayAgent
1 appearance
Gerry LeggAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Bayham

Bill KniftonAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich

Wybe CnossenAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich, respondent

Wybe CnossenAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of North Perth

Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Thames Centre, respondent

David A. BroadCounsel
1 appearance

for the NFU-O

Don MillsAgent
1 appearance
Alvaro VenturelliAgent
1 appearance
Ann SlaterAgent
1 appearance
John SutherlandAgent
1 appearance
Michael SchmidtAgent
1 appearance
Peter DowlingAgent
1 appearance
Rae MacIntyreAgent
1 appearance
Sean McGivernAgent
1 appearance
Steve DickAgent
1 appearance

for the OFA

Lori PerkesAgent
3 appearances
Neil CurrieAgent
3 appearances
Jason BentAgent
1 appearance
Mark WalesAgent
1 appearance

for The Open Marketing Group

Brian SimpsonAgent
2 appearances

for the respondent

Fred ThomsonAgent
2 appearances
Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
2 appearances
Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance
Rebecca GivensCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance
John BarkovicAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Tim DickAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, OFCTGMB

Barry BresnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Ontario Processing Vegetable Growers

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers’ Marketing Board

Barry H. BresnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of Amherstburg

Bruce CrozierAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, Turkey Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town

David H. GrahlmanAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Amherstburg

Eric ChamberlainAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Fort Erie

Brett RuckAgent
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Kingsville

Perry DunmoreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Middlesex Centre, respondent

Andrew WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the upstream agricultural appellants

Janet McGuigan KellyCounsel
1 appearance

for Town of Kingsville

Ruth Orton-PertCounsel
1 appearance

for Wilhemina Van Raay, assessed landowner

Bert Van RaayAgent
1 appearance

for Zantingh Direct Inc. and Zantingh Swine Inc.

Brad ZantinghAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas RichterCounsel
1 appearance

for Zantingh Direct Inc. and Zantingh Swine Inc. (Zantingh)

Brad ZantinghAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas RichterCounsel
1 appearance

landowner

Doug JohnstonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Thomas GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Manager of Transportation and Drainage for Municipality

Geoff BrooksAgent
1 appearance

Manager of Transportation and Drainage for the Municipality

Geoff BrooksAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of AGRICORP

Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Diana Hamm

Victor HammAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of himself and his brother Ron Jarvis, appellants

Keith JarvisSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of himself, John and Betty Denby, appellants

William (Bill) DenbySelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of Municipality

Colin G. TriversAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Municipality of West Perth

Mike KraemerAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO)

George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Lakeshore, respondent

Edward DriesAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

Phair Systems Ltd., respondent

Bill PhairAgent
1 appearance

Reeve, Township of Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

Ben Van DiepenbeekAgent
1 appearance

representative for Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance

representative for Karin Gagne, appellant

Daniel DevereuxAgent
1 appearance
Ed DykstraAgent
1 appearance

representative for the respondent

George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance

representative for Xeltron S.A., respondent

Arturo AgueroAgent
1 appearance

representative of Leanne Landers and Stephen Herman, appellants

Barbara HermanAgent
1 appearance

representative of the respondent, Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
3 appearances

representative of upstream agricultural owners

John McGuiganAgent
1 appearance

representing appellant Percy and Gladys Dufour

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

representing assessed landowner S. Proctor

John ProctorAgent
1 appearance

representing Elizabeth Trepanier, assessed landowner

Lawrence TrepanierAgent
1 appearance

representing George Vanderbeke, assessed landowner

Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance

representing Marion Piggott

Gary PiggottAgent
1 appearance
Mark RankinAgent
1 appearance

representing Percy Steele, assessed landowner

Jack SteeleAgent
1 appearance

representing Shevaun Day, an appellant

Steve VoisinAgent
1 appearance

representing the appellants

Roderick McCormickAgent
1 appearance

representing the City of Kawartha Lakes

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

representing the municipality

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

Secretary/Treasurer of 517749 Ontario Ltd on behalf of Mr. Mario Valletta, assessed landowner in the Elliott Drain watershed

Lucy VallettaAgent
1 appearance

the appellant

Jeff CridlandSelf-represented
1 appearance

the Engineer who prepared the Report

Gerard RoodAgent
1 appearance

111

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

0.7

cases/mo

OAFRAAT111(100%)

Decision types

appeal

motion

trial

Page 2 of 6 (111 cases)