Who is Kirk Walstedt?

Kirk Walstedt is a vice chair at the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal with 111 decisions on record from 2005 to 2017. Key areas include administrative law, other tribunals, environmental law.

What tribunal does Kirk Walstedt sit on?

Kirk Walstedt sits on the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does Kirk Walstedt decide?

Kirk Walstedt's most common areas include Administrative Law (109 decisions), Other Tribunals (108 decisions), Environmental Law (21 decisions). Kirk Walstedt has handled 111 decisions across 4 areas.

How many decisions has Kirk Walstedt made?

Kirk Walstedt has 111 decisions on record from 2005 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Kirk Walstedt?

Representatives who frequently appear before Kirk Walstedt include Henry Bos, Geoff Spurr, John Kuntze.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Kirk Walstedt — Vice Chair

Kirk Walstedt

Vice Chair·Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal·Since 2005

111

cases · 13 yrs · OAFRAAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Chair· 67Vice Chair· 15Vice Chair· 15Chair· 4Vice Chair· 3Chair· 2Chair· 1Vice Chair· 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 6, 2017

Appeal of drainage assessment dismissed; engineer's amended assessment schedule confirmed as technically sound and equitable.

The appellants appealed the decision of the reconvened Court of Revision regarding the amended assessment schedule for the repair and improvement of the Southwest Branch of the Shepley Drain.

The appellants argued that the watershed limits and resulting assessments on their property were incorrect.

The Tribunal found the engineer's methods and the resulting amended assessments to be technically sound and equitable, dismissing the appeal and confirming the amended assessments.

Lynne and Rainer Pahl v. Town of Essex, 2017 ONAFRAAT 15

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 11, 2017

Application to amend drainage by-law granted to reflect as-constructed outdoor pump station modifications.

The City of Sarnia applied to the Tribunal under section 58(4) of the Drainage Act to amend a by-law governing the Clark Drain and Branches.

During construction of a pump station, asbestos was discovered in the existing building, leading to delays and a redesign that replaced the planned building with an outdoor station and weatherproof enclosures.

The Tribunal found that the modifications did not negatively impact the drainage works' capacity or cost apportionment, and granted the application to amend the by-law to reflect the as-constructed drawings.

City of Sarnia (Re), 2017 ONAFRAAT 11

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 4, 2016

Tribunal redistributes bridge replacement and driveway restoration costs caused by upstream development away from affected property owners.

The appellants appealed the special benefit assessments levied against their properties for the replacement of access bridges and the restoration of their asphalt driveways as part of a municipal drain improvement project.

The Tribunal found that the need to replace the bridges was entirely due to increased flows from upstream residential development that lacked proper stormwater management.

Consequently, the Tribunal granted the appeals, removing the special benefit assessments from the appellants' properties and redistributing the costs to the upstream non-agricultural lands and the municipal road authorities.

Dufour Drain and Branches A & B (Re), 2016 ONAFRAAT 19

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 11, 2016

Engineer's report for municipal drain referred back for revision; proposed works on appellant's property found excessive.

The appellant appealed the Engineer's Report for the Setterington Lane Municipal Drain under the Drainage Act, challenging the assessments, the design of the drainage works, and the allowances provided.

The Tribunal found that the proposed work on the appellant's property, which included a large ditch and stormwater management facility, was excessive and unnecessary.

The Tribunal referred the report back to the Municipality with directions to delete the assumption of the existing drain upstream of a certain point, incorporate the construction of a berm as previously agreed upon by the neighbours, and increase the land allowance from $15,000 to $35,000 per acre.

2217273 Ontario Inc. v. Municipality of Leamington, 2016 ONAFRAAT 6

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 13, 2014

Drainage assessment reduced as proposed deep tile drain provided limited benefit to already-drained property.

The appellants appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Wakem-Weir Drain 2013, arguing their property was already systematically drained and derived no benefit from the proposed new drain.

The Tribunal found that while the property derived some benefit from the new catch basins and drain configuration, the assessment was excessive because the new drain was unusually deep and did not provide 'Cut-off Benefit' or improve crop production.

The Tribunal ordered significant reductions to the appellants' benefit and outlet assessments, redistributing the reduced amounts pro rata to upstream lands and roads, including a special assessment to Enbridge.

Ronald Pearson v. Municipality of Thames Centre, 2014 ONAFRAAT 10

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 15, 2013

Drainage report amended to increase Section 29 land allowance for a restricted working corridor.

The appellant appealed an Engineer's Report under the Drainage Act regarding the relocation of a drain onto their agricultural property to facilitate a neighbouring residential development.

The Tribunal upheld the proposed location and design of the drain, finding the benefits exceeded the costs.

However, the Tribunal found that the Engineer erred by not providing a Section 29 allowance for a 7.5 m working corridor adjacent to the drain, as the land use restrictions imposed a permanent impact.

The Tribunal ordered the Section 29 allowance increased by $22,500 to compensate for the working corridor.

Millbrook Drain (Re), 2013 ONAFRAAT 10

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 4, 2013

Appeal of Engineer's Report dismissed; appellant ordered to disconnect unauthorized tile drains from municipal drain.

The appellants appealed an Engineer's Report under the Drainage Act regarding the Saxon Drain Branch No. 1.

The Engineer discovered that the appellants had installed tile drains that diverted water from outside the historical Saxon Drain watershed into the drain, overburdening its capacity.

The Engineer recommended blocking the unauthorized tiles and improving the adjacent Bateman Drain.

The appellants argued the historical watershed was incorrectly defined and their tiles did not adversely impact the drain.

The Tribunal found the appellants knowingly tiled beyond their assessed watershed, adversely impacting downstream landowners.

The Tribunal upheld the Engineer's recommendations to block the tiles and confirmed the assessments, but ordered that recommendations regarding improvements to the Bateman Drain be handled under a separate Section 78 process rather than forming part of the Saxon Drain by-law.

Saxon Drain Branch No. 1 (RE), 2013 ONAFRAAT 7

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 6, 2012

Ontario Federation of Agriculture accredited as a farm organization for three years.

The Ontario Federation of Agriculture applied to the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal for accreditation as a farm organization under the Farm Registration and Farm Organizations Funding Act, 1993.

The Tribunal reviewed the application against the amended criteria in O. Reg. 723/93.

Finding that the applicant met all prescribed criteria, including having an annual membership fee of at least $195, being incorporated, representing persons carrying on farming businesses, providing advice to governments, and agreeing to provide special funding to the eligible francophone organization, the Tribunal granted the accreditation for a period of three years.

Ontario Federation of Agriculture (Re), 2012 ONAFRAAT 39

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 6, 2012

Farm organization accreditation granted after applicant met all newly amended statutory criteria.

The Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario applied to the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal for accreditation as a farm organization under the Farm Registration and Farm Organizations Funding Act, 1993.

The Tribunal reviewed the application against the newly amended criteria in Ontario Regulation 723/93.

Finding that the applicant met all prescribed criteria, including membership fee requirements, incorporation, purpose, and funding agreements, the Tribunal granted the accreditation for a period of three years.

Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario Accreditation #2, 2012 ONAFRAAT 40

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 24, 2012

Drainage appeals largely dismissed; engineer's report upheld except for one property size correction.

Several landowners appealed the engineer's report and the decisions of the Court of Revision regarding the repair and improvement of the 4th Concession Drain in the Town of Kingsville.

The appellants raised issues concerning the necessity of widening the drain, compensation for tree removal, the cost of culvert replacement, and the calculation of their assessments based on property features like ponds and woodlots.

The Tribunal dismissed most of the appeals, accepting the engineer's evidence that the widening was necessary to prevent flooding and that the assessments were properly calculated.

However, the Tribunal granted the appeal of Ryan and Samantha Spitse in part, reducing their affected area and corresponding assessments to reflect the actual size of their property.

4th Concession Drain (Re), 2012 ONAFRAAT 31

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 28, 2012

Drainage assessment appeal dismissed; appellant failed to provide credible evidence to justify a reduction.

The appellant appealed the assessment for the Kershaw Drain under the Drainage Act, arguing that the cost of the drain realignment on his property was too high and that he could have done the work privately for less.

The Tribunal found the engineer's assessment rationale to be fair, reasonable, and compliant with the Act, noting that the appellant provided no credible evidence to support a reduction.

The appeal was denied, and the Tribunal declined to award costs to the municipality, finding the appellant's conduct was not frivolous or in bad faith.

Rein Minnema (Minnema Farms Ltd.) v. Municipality of Southwest Middlesex, 2012 ONAFRAAT 29

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 10, 2012

Engineer's report referred back for reconsideration on consent; appeal dismissed.

The appellant appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Marr Municipal Drain 2011 Improvement.

Following an initial hearing where the Tribunal set aside the Engineer's Report, the Municipality requested that the report be referred back to the Engineer for reconsideration under section 57 of the Drainage Act to ensure it included the required overall drainage plan.

The appellant consented to this request.

The Tribunal ordered the report referred back to the Engineer and dismissed the appeal.

Marr Municipal Drain 2011 (RE) PHC, 2012 ONAFRAAT 27

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 15, 2012

Tribunal allows dairy quota transfer from parent to child, finding DFO policy did not prohibit it.

The appellant appealed a decision by the Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO) denying his request to transfer his dairy quota to his daughter.

The DFO denied the transfer because it would effectively merge the quota with the daughter's in-laws' existing dairy operation, which the DFO argued was prohibited under its 2010 Parent to Child Transfer policy.

The Tribunal found that the plain language of the 2010 policy did not actually prohibit the specific type of transfer requested, despite the DFO's stated intentions to prevent mergers.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal and ordered the DFO to process the quota transfer.

Alan Cunnington v. Dairy Farmers of Ontario, 2012 ONAFRAAT 25

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 25, 2012

Tribunal ordered a new hearing to review post-hearing evidence after orally setting aside an engineer's report.

The appellant appealed a decision of the Court of Revision regarding an Engineer's Report for municipal drain improvements.

At the hearing, the Tribunal orally ordered the Report set aside due to non-compliance with the Drainage Act, including the engineer's failure to independently research land ownership and use, and procedural irregularities.

Following the hearing, the municipality submitted new information contradicting evidence presented at the hearing.

The Tribunal ordered a new hearing to review the post-hearing submission and its effect on the oral order.

Shawn Parkins v. Municipality of Central Elgin, 2012 ONAFRAAT 19

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 26, 2012

Appeal allowed; dairy quota transfer to daughter permitted as DFO policy did not explicitly prohibit it.

The appellant dairy farmer appealed a decision by the Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO) denying his request to transfer his dairy quota to his daughter.

The DFO had denied the request on the basis that the transfer would effectively merge the quota with her husband's family's existing dairy operation, which the DFO argued was prohibited under its 2010 policy changes.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the plain language of the 2010 Parent to Child Transfer policy did not actually prohibit the requested transfer, despite the DFO's stated intentions to prevent mergers.

The Tribunal ordered the quota transferred.

Cunnington v. Dairy Farmers of Ontario, 2012 ONAFRAAT 17

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 23, 2012

Farm organization's reaccreditation refused for failing to meet membership agreement and financial reporting criteria.

The applicant farm organization applied to the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal for renewal of its accreditation under the Farm Registration and Farm Organizations Funding Act, 1993.

The Tribunal considered whether the mandatory payment provided to the Ministry could be treated as a membership fee, concluding it could only if an explicit membership agreement existed.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's practice of conferring membership automatically upon payment contravened the Act.

Furthermore, the applicant failed to meet the prescribed criteria regarding the content and timely submission of its audited financial statements.

Consequently, the Tribunal refused the application for reaccreditation.

Ontario Federation of Agriculture Reaccreditation, 2012 ONAFRAAT 10

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 23, 2012

NFU-O's application for reaccreditation refused for failing to meet prescribed criteria under the Act.

The National Farmers Union - Ontario (NFU-O) applied to the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal for a renewal of its accreditation under the Farm Registration and Farm Organizations Funding Act, 1993.

The Tribunal considered whether the payment of the prescribed amount to the Ministry could be treated as a membership fee, concluding it could only if an explicit membership agreement existed.

The Tribunal found that the NFU-O did not meet several prescribed criteria for accredited farm organizations, including those related to membership agreements, audited financial statements, and electoral processes.

Consequently, the Tribunal refused the NFU-O's application for reaccreditation.

National Farmers Union - Ontario Reaccreditation, 2012 ONAFRAAT 11

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 17, 2012

Tribunal rescinds Court of Revision's arbitrary assessment reduction and reinstates original drainage report assessments.

The County of Elgin appealed a decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Kalita-Pfeifer Drain.

The Court of Revision had reduced the assessment of a private landowner and added the difference to the County's assessment.

The Tribunal found the Engineer's original assessment methodology to be technically sound and compliant with the Drainage Act.

Finding no rationale for the Court of Revision's decision, the Tribunal rescinded the reduction and reinstated the original assessments.

Kalita-Pfeifer Drain (Re), 2012 ONAFRAAT 6

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 17, 2012

Tribunal varies Court of Revision's drainage assessment reapportionments, reinstating original benefit assessments for road authority.

The County of Elgin appealed a decision of the Court of Revision regarding drainage assessments for the Talbot Line Drain.

The Court of Revision had reduced assessments for two property owners and reapportioned those costs entirely to the County.

The Tribunal confirmed one reduction based on new evidence but ordered the costs reapportioned among all affected parties.

The Tribunal rescinded the second reduction, finding no rationale for the Court of Revision's decision, and reinstated the original benefit assessments from the Engineer's Report.

County of Elgin v. Municipality of West Elgin, 2012 ONAFRAAT 7

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 3, 2012

Drainage assessment appeal dismissed; tribunal upholds engineer's benefit/outlet split and methodology.

The appellant appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the East Ruthven Drain, arguing that the single Construction Schedule of Assessment was inappropriate and that the 91%/9% Benefit/Outlet split unfairly penalized the appellant.

The Tribunal accepted the engineer's report methodology, finding that the road formed a barrier to drainage and that the assessment split was logical.

The appeal was denied, save for a minor correction assessing the cost of relocating water services to the respondent as the water utility.

Corporation of the County of Essex v. Town of Kingsville, 2012 ONAFRAAT 1

Page 1 of 6 (111 cases)

appellant

Henry BosSelf-represented
4 appearances
Dale McFeetersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Alan CunningtonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Carolyn BoyceSelf-represented
1 appearance
David BoyceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Diana HammSelf-represented
1 appearance
Finlay McCormickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fred DaubertSelf-represented
1 appearance
George VanderbekeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gladys DufourSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helmut FunkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeanette JenkinsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim JenkinsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance
John PetropoulosSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph PruynSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith EmmettSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ludmila DejmekSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant

Rein MinnemaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ronald PearsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn ParkinsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance
Kenneth PearsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marian EadieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald EadieSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant and assessed landowner

Jackie OrgarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Louis VargaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea ClemencioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Clifford TattersallSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dave OrgarSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant, and assessed landowner

Robert GregsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant/Landowner

Georges BicrelSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellants

Moira DaubertSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HuardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fred DaubertSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andy HuardSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellants

Rainer PahlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lynne PahlSelf-represented
1 appearance

applicant

John VieraitisSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner

Tony RitolaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne BuchananSelf-represented
1 appearance
William TiessenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andre CartierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Claire GiffinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cliff IvensSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don GiffinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Earl HardingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edwin ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Garry SteeleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Harry KellerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hugh WalkerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jan Van NulandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim SteeleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Keith ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lew AcreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Liz BuchananSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maggie WahlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marjorie SteeleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Neil BrownSelf-represented
1 appearance

Assessed landowner

Keith ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter SemowoniukSelf-represented
1 appearance

Assessed Landowner

Karen WakemSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ron WakemSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, appellant

Paul BrownSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner in the Elliott Drain watershed

Barbara BalogSelf-represented
1 appearance

Assistant to counsel for Appellant

Curtis CleeverCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the Municipality of North Perth

Andrew OsyanyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the respondent

Geoff SpurrCounsel
3 appearances

counsel for the Town of Kingsville

Ruth Orton-PertCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for Xeltron S.A., respondent

Cheryl BiehlerCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Agricorp

Karin RasmussenCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Agricorp, the respondent

Rebecca GivenCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to John and Susanna Cayer

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Mike Koczycki appellant

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant

John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants

Julian FalconerCounsel
2 appearances
Sunil MathaiCounsel
2 appearances

counsel to the Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Dairy Farmers of Ontario, respondent

Geoffrey SpurCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Ontario Milk Transport Association, appellant

Andrew OsyanyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
2 appearances

counsel to the Township of Perth South

Gerry CullitonCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Township of Kingsville

Perry DunmoreCounsel
1 appearance

Deputy Clerk

Dianne WilsonAgent
1 appearance

Director, Drainage Division for the municipality

Tim DickAgent
1 appearance

Director Physical Services for Municipality

Lloyd PerrinAgent
1 appearance

Director Physical Services for the Municipality

Lloyd PerrinAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for Municipality

Brett RuckAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the City of Port Colborne

Rene LandryAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for the Municipality

Brett RuckAgent
1 appearance
Elizabeth JefferyAgent
1 appearance
Harold HallAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich, respondent

Ralph BeharrellAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the Township of Southwold, assessed landowner

Brent ClutterbuckAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich

Ralph BeharrellAgent
1 appearance

Engineer for the Corporation of the County of Essex, appellant

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

engineer for the municipality

Tim OliverAgent
1 appearance

Engineer for the Report

Bill DietrichAgent
1 appearance

Engineer on behalf of the Municipality

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

Engineer, on behalf of the Municipality

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
John SprietAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the report

Gerard RoodAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report

Jeff DicksonAgent
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the report

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Mike P. DeVosAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the Report

John KuntzeAgent
3 appearances
J.R. (Jeff) DicksonAgent
2 appearances
Gerard RoodAgent
2 appearances
John SprietAgent
1 appearance
Paul SmeltzerAgent
1 appearance
Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance
Raymond DobbinAgent
1 appearance
R.O. (Ray) DobbinAgent
1 appearance
John M. SprietAgent
1 appearance

for all of the appellants

Timothy FlanneryCounsel
1 appearance

for Amico Properties Inc.

Cindy PrinceAgent
1 appearance

for Brian Whelan

Larry PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Brunato Farms Limited, Assessed Landowner

James CookCounsel
1 appearance

for CFO

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Janet CioruchAgent
1 appearance

for CLPA Inc., assessed landowner

Barbara RozakAgent
1 appearance
Tony RozakAgent
1 appearance

for Conestoga Meat Packers/Progressive Pork Producers

Arnold DrungAgent
1 appearance
Bob HunsbergerAgent
1 appearance
Frank DevetAgent
1 appearance

for Conestoga Meat Packers/Progressive Pork Producers (Conestoga 3P)

Arnold DrungAgent
1 appearance
Bob HunsbergerAgent
1 appearance

for Daniel Neufeld, assessed landowner

William NeufeldAgent
2 appearances

for De Wetering Hill Farms

Teresa De WeteringAgent
2 appearances

for Districts 10, 11 and 12 Pork Producers

Bruce HudsonAgent
1 appearance
Rob de WoldeAgent
1 appearance

for Elizabeth Trepanier, assessed landowner

Lawrence TrepanierAgent
1 appearance

for Grant and Sharon Wolfe and Jim Wolfe, Assessed Landowners

M. Paul DownsCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Elaine HeyinkSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself and Eckro Precision

Terry EckertSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Bud KellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Clare HartleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jay MaxnerSelf-represented
1 appearance
John CampbellSelf-represented
1 appearance
William YoungSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself and his brother Ron Jarvis, appellants

Keith JarvisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself, John and Betty Denby, appellants

William (Bill) DenbySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Huron County Pork Producers' Association

Grant LoveAgent
2 appearances
John Vander BurgtAgent
2 appearances

for intervenor, the Association of Ontario Chicken Processors

Herman TurkstraCounsel
1 appearance

for John and Susanna Cayer

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for Kenneth and Lynda Anderson

Dennis H. AsherCounsel
1 appearance

for Maple Leaf Consumer Foods

Cathy AkerAgent
1 appearance
Don DavidsonAgent
1 appearance

for Maple Leaf Consumer Foods (Maple Leaf)

Cathy AkerAgent
1 appearance
Don DavidsonAgent
1 appearance

for Mr. Mitri

G. MeakingsCounsel
1 appearance

for Mr. Schives, the petitioner

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Pork Producers' Marketing Board

Ken OvingtonAgent
1 appearance
Kim MullinCounsel
1 appearance
Wilma JeffrayAgent
1 appearance

for Ontario Pork Producers' Marketing Board (Ontario Pork)

Maryann HendrikxAgent
1 appearance
Ken OvingtonAgent
1 appearance
Sean ForanCounsel
1 appearance
Wilma JeffrayAgent
1 appearance

for Patricia Larkin, assessed landowner

Joseph LarkinAgent
1 appearance

for Pyramid Farms, assessed landowner

Dean TiessenAgent
1 appearance
William TiessenAgent
1 appearance

for Quality Meat Packers

Dan CohoeAgent
2 appearances
Jim GracieAgent
1 appearance

for Rein Minnema

Elbert van DonkersgoedAgent
2 appearances

for respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO)

Graham LloydCounsel
2 appearances

for Sure Fresh Foods Inc.

Andrew HealCounsel
1 appearance
Hank Van VoorstAgent
1 appearance

for Synergy Swine, Paragon Farms, and RFW Farms

James ReesorAgent
1 appearance
Mark YungblutAgent
1 appearance
Rob McDougallAgent
1 appearance

for Synergy Swine, Paragon Farms, and RFW Farms (Synergy et al.)

Mark YungblutAgent
1 appearance
James ReesorAgent
1 appearance
Rob McDougallAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant

Donald GoodCounsel
2 appearances
Carina BruggemanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris MastersonAgent
1 appearance
Damon SrokoszSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance
Jim MastersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John CoxonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Matthew DickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael AllemanoCounsel
1 appearance
Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance
Rick GrimaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sher HelmerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom BradishSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barry CardCounsel
1 appearance
Wayne HartungSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Donald MurneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary ArtsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Max IlandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael LabaCounsel
1 appearance
Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance
Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance
Wilhelm GreisbachSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellant, Frank Pohorly

Steven PohorlyAgent
1 appearance
Susan PohorlyAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant George Vanderbeke

Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance

for the Appellant, Gubbels Farms Ltd.

Jim CaskeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Paul and Nancy Brown

John WiebeAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Ruedel Farms Inc.

John TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants

Cheryl LenehanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Jeannine MillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard MetcalfeAgent
1 appearance
Terry MillerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellants, Wyatt Stetler and 934671 Ontario Limited

Burton TaitCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Alvaro VenturelliUnion representative
1 appearance
Ann SlaterUnion representative
1 appearance
Don MillsUnion representative
1 appearance
John SutherlandUnion representative
1 appearance
Peter DowlingUnion representative
1 appearance

for the CFFO

Lorne SmallAgent
2 appearances
Henry StevensAgent
1 appearance
John ClementAgent
1 appearance
Gerald PoechmanAgent
1 appearance
Nathan StevensAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Port Colborne, respondent

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the County of Elgin, the appellant

Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance

for the Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Alex HamiltonAgent
1 appearance
Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance
Ross CrawfordAgent
1 appearance

for the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs

Kristopher Crawford-DickinsonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Municipality

Janet McGuigan-KellyCounsel
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Ruth OrtonCounsel
1 appearance
Ruth Orton-PertCounsel
1 appearance
Steven ShoemakerCounsel
1 appearance
Wray RamsayAgent
1 appearance
Gerry LeggAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Bayham

Bill KniftonAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich

Wybe CnossenAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich, respondent

Wybe CnossenAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of North Perth

Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Thames Centre, respondent

David A. BroadCounsel
1 appearance

for the NFU-O

Don MillsAgent
1 appearance
Alvaro VenturelliAgent
1 appearance
Ann SlaterAgent
1 appearance
John SutherlandAgent
1 appearance
Michael SchmidtAgent
1 appearance
Peter DowlingAgent
1 appearance
Rae MacIntyreAgent
1 appearance
Sean McGivernAgent
1 appearance
Steve DickAgent
1 appearance

for the OFA

Lori PerkesAgent
3 appearances
Neil CurrieAgent
3 appearances
Jason BentAgent
1 appearance
Mark WalesAgent
1 appearance

for The Open Marketing Group

Brian SimpsonAgent
2 appearances

for the respondent

Fred ThomsonAgent
2 appearances
Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
2 appearances
Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance
Rebecca GivensCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance
John BarkovicAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Tim DickAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, OFCTGMB

Barry BresnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Ontario Processing Vegetable Growers

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers’ Marketing Board

Barry H. BresnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of Amherstburg

Bruce CrozierAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, Turkey Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town

David H. GrahlmanAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Amherstburg

Eric ChamberlainAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Fort Erie

Brett RuckAgent
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Kingsville

Perry DunmoreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Middlesex Centre, respondent

Andrew WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the upstream agricultural appellants

Janet McGuigan KellyCounsel
1 appearance

for Town of Kingsville

Ruth Orton-PertCounsel
1 appearance

for Wilhemina Van Raay, assessed landowner

Bert Van RaayAgent
1 appearance

for Zantingh Direct Inc. and Zantingh Swine Inc.

Brad ZantinghAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas RichterCounsel
1 appearance

for Zantingh Direct Inc. and Zantingh Swine Inc. (Zantingh)

Brad ZantinghAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas RichterCounsel
1 appearance

landowner

Doug JohnstonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Thomas GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Manager of Transportation and Drainage for Municipality

Geoff BrooksAgent
1 appearance

Manager of Transportation and Drainage for the Municipality

Geoff BrooksAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of AGRICORP

Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Diana Hamm

Victor HammAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of himself and his brother Ron Jarvis, appellants

Keith JarvisSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of himself, John and Betty Denby, appellants

William (Bill) DenbySelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of Municipality

Colin G. TriversAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Municipality of West Perth

Mike KraemerAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO)

George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Lakeshore, respondent

Edward DriesAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

Phair Systems Ltd., respondent

Bill PhairAgent
1 appearance

Reeve, Township of Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

Ben Van DiepenbeekAgent
1 appearance

representative for Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance

representative for Karin Gagne, appellant

Daniel DevereuxAgent
1 appearance
Ed DykstraAgent
1 appearance

representative for the respondent

George MacNaughtonAgent
1 appearance

representative for Xeltron S.A., respondent

Arturo AgueroAgent
1 appearance

representative of Leanne Landers and Stephen Herman, appellants

Barbara HermanAgent
1 appearance

representative of the respondent, Agricorp

Fred ThomsonAgent
3 appearances

representative of upstream agricultural owners

John McGuiganAgent
1 appearance

representing appellant Percy and Gladys Dufour

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

representing assessed landowner S. Proctor

John ProctorAgent
1 appearance

representing Elizabeth Trepanier, assessed landowner

Lawrence TrepanierAgent
1 appearance

representing George Vanderbeke, assessed landowner

Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance

representing Marion Piggott

Gary PiggottAgent
1 appearance
Mark RankinAgent
1 appearance

representing Percy Steele, assessed landowner

Jack SteeleAgent
1 appearance

representing Shevaun Day, an appellant

Steve VoisinAgent
1 appearance

representing the appellants

Roderick McCormickAgent
1 appearance

representing the City of Kawartha Lakes

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

representing the municipality

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

Secretary/Treasurer of 517749 Ontario Ltd on behalf of Mr. Mario Valletta, assessed landowner in the Elliott Drain watershed

Lucy VallettaAgent
1 appearance

the appellant

Jeff CridlandSelf-represented
1 appearance

the Engineer who prepared the Report

Gerard RoodAgent
1 appearance

111

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

0.7

cases/mo

OAFRAAT111(100%)

Decision types

appeal

motion

trial

Page 1 of 6 (111 cases)