Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 21, 2017

Reconsideration request dismissed where applicant failed to attend hearing and provided inadequate excuse.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application as abandoned after he failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The applicant argued he was unwell on the hearing date and provided an email sent to his employer stating he could not attend work.

The Tribunal dismissed the reconsideration request, finding that the email demonstrated the applicant had planned to attend work rather than the hearing, and noted he failed to notify the Tribunal of his absence.

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of respecting the adjudicative process and the public resources involved.

Zoher Mala v. Bradley Geddes, 2017 HRTO 921

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 28, 2016

Employer found liable for sexual harassment and reprisal for withholding wages after employee rejected sexual advances.

The applicant, a legal assistant/paralegal, alleged that the individual respondent, who owned the respondent organization, subjected her to sexual harassment and sexual advances in the workplace.

When she rejected his advances, he retaliated by refusing to pay her wages, forcing her to resign.

The Tribunal found that the individual respondent engaged in a course of vexatious conduct, including unwanted text messages and solicitations, which amounted to sexual harassment.

The Tribunal also found that the failure to pay the applicant for over two months was a reprisal for rejecting the advances.

The respondents were found jointly and severally liable and ordered to pay $29,400 in monetary compensation for injury to dignity, lost income, and future counselling.

Anderson v. Law Help Ltd., 2016 HRTO 1683

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 22, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abuse of process for applicant's refusal to produce ordered medical records.

The applicant alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of disability (diabetes) after the respondent put a conditional offer of employment on hold pending medical clearance.

The Tribunal previously ordered the applicant to produce relevant medical documents.

The applicant failed to comply, citing financial constraints and distance, but refused to request a fee waiver or make reasonable efforts to obtain the documents.

The Tribunal found the applicant's refusal to comply with the production order without a reasonable excuse constituted an abuse of process and dismissed the application.

Gerred v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2016 HRTO 1674

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 21, 2016

Application against truck rental company dismissed as its extra-provincial operations fall under federal jurisdiction.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination against two respondents.

One respondent, a truck rental company, brought a preliminary request to dismiss the application against it on the basis that its operations fall under federal jurisdiction.

The Tribunal found that the respondent's operations involved continuous and regular extra-provincial transportation of goods.

Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the respondent is a federal undertaking under s. 92(10)(a) of the Constitution Act, 1867, and dismissed the application against it for lack of jurisdiction.

Summerhill v. AllStaff Inc., 2016 HRTO 1647

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 19, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal direction.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code, which was deferred pending the conclusion of a proceeding before the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to advise whether the WSIB proceeding was still ongoing.

The applicant failed to respond to the Tribunal's direction.

The application was deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Darrell McKee v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2016 HRTO 1633

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 19, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to reactivate following deferred proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application which was deferred pending the conclusion of another legal proceeding.

Following the final judgment in the other proceeding, the applicant failed to request reactivation of the application within the required 60-day period under Rule 14.

The respondent filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings seeking dismissal.

The applicant did not respond.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

A.B. v. Sunshine Montessori School, 2016 HRTO 1627

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 19, 2016

Respondent granted early access to applicant's internal medical file to prepare its response.

The respondent filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings seeking access to the applicant's Occupational Health and Claims Management file to prepare its Response to the human rights application.

The applicant did not respond to the request.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding that exceptional circumstances justified early production of the medical documents, as privacy legislation otherwise prevented the respondent from accessing its own internal files needed to meaningfully respond.

Crawshaw v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2016 HRTO 1632

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 25, 2016

Summary hearing to dismiss human rights application denied due to unresolved credibility issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to services because of disability, based on comments made by a police officer during an interaction.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed at a summary hearing for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that there were differing versions of the facts and credibility issues that could not be resolved at a summary hearing.

Assuming the applicant's version of the facts to be true, the Tribunal concluded the application had a reasonable prospect of success and declined to dismiss it.

Kiers v. Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2016 HRTO 1505

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 15, 2016

Adjournment granted to respondent due to counsel's childcare responsibilities to ensure procedural fairness.

The respondent requested an adjournment of the hearing because its counsel had erroneously released the hearing dates and was scheduled to be the primary caregiver for his newborn baby.

The applicant opposed the request, noting his own prior adjournment request had been denied.

The Tribunal granted the adjournment, finding that proceeding without counsel for the respondent would violate principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.

Ivan De Luca v. McMaster University, 2016 HRTO 1467

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 7, 2016

Human rights application alleging surveillance and harassment by social housing provider dismissed at summary hearing.

The applicant, a tenant in social housing, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on race, colour, ethnic origin, and receipt of public assistance.

He alleged that the building superintendent and management engaged in surveillance and harassment, including using secret cameras and recruiting other residents to follow him.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that the allegations lacked an air of reality and the applicant provided no evidence beyond mere speculation to link the alleged incidents to any Code grounds.

Francis Aboagye v. Region of Peel – Human Services Housing Operations and Management Services Peel Living, 2016 HRTO 1442

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 4, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to comply with disclosure rules.

The applicant filed a human rights application but failed to comply with the Tribunal's rules regarding pre-hearing disclosure of documents and witness statements.

Despite a Case Assessment Direction ordering compliance, the applicant failed to provide the required materials and suggested she might not attend the scheduled hearing.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Francis v. Best Buy Canada Ltd., 2016 HRTO 1438

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 2, 2016

Adjournment request denied; lack of preparation is not an extraordinary circumstance.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing more than 14 days after the Notice of Hearing was issued, citing a lack of preparation and difficulty accessing witnesses.

The respondent consented to the request.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment, finding that a lack of preparation does not constitute an extraordinary circumstance justifying an adjournment under the Tribunal's Practice Direction.

De Luca v. McMaster University, 2016 HRTO 1426

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 2, 2016

Tribunal declines to dismiss disability discrimination application at summary hearing due to factual disputes.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, claiming he was not hired after disclosing a learning disability prior to taking an integrity test.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application should be dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal declined to dismiss the application on a preliminary basis, finding that there were factual disputes regarding the test results and that, assuming the applicant's allegations were true, the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

Ryan v. Labour Ready Temporary Services, Ltd., 2016 HRTO 1425

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 31, 2016

Request for particulars denied; parties must complete exchange of pleadings before raising preliminary matters.

The respondents in a human rights application filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings seeking an extension of time to file their Response and an order for particulars.

The Tribunal found the extension request moot and denied the request for particulars, noting that parties are expected to complete the exchange of pleadings before raising preliminary matters.

The respondents were ordered to file their Response within seven days.

K.L. v. Thames Valley District School Board, 2016 HRTO 1402

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 28, 2016

Tribunal waives 60-day time limit and allows reactivation of deferred application due to short delay.

The applicant filed a request to reactivate her deferred human rights application following the conclusion of a related WSIAT proceeding.

The respondent opposed the request, arguing it was filed outside the 60-day time limit under Rule 14.4.

The Tribunal found that while the request was approximately two weeks late, the applicant provided a reasonable explanation based on a mistaken belief about the WSIAT deadline.

Given the short delay and lack of significant prejudice to the respondents, the Tribunal waived the time limit and granted the request to reactivate the application.

Linda Hill v. Cotton Inc. and Renzo Giancaterino, 2016 HRTO 1394

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 26, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as untimely because the delay in filing was not incurred in good faith.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability regarding his 14-month detention in a maximum security mental health facility.

The application was filed approximately two years and nine months after the last alleged incident.

The Tribunal found that the delay was not incurred in good faith, as the applicant had been found capable of managing his property and had actively participated in other legal proceedings during the delay period.

The application was dismissed as untimely.

W.S. v. Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2016 HRTO 1382

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 26, 2016

Human rights application dismissed; job reclassification was a business decision, not discriminatory or a reprisal.

The applicant, a Sinhalese man originally from Sri Lanka, alleged that his employer discriminated against him and subjected him to reprisals by reclassifying his position from cook to pizza maker, resulting in lower wages.

The Tribunal dismissed the allegations relating to incidents between 2007 and 2011 as untimely, finding the delay was not incurred in good faith.

On the merits of the 2012 reclassification, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence that the decision was based on the applicant's race, place of origin, ethnic origin, or as a reprisal.

The evidence showed the reclassification affected multiple employees of different backgrounds and was a business decision, not a discriminatory act.

Mihindukulasuriya v. Aramark Canada Limited, 2016 HRTO 1388

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 24, 2016

Adjournment granted due to respondent's mandatory food safety audit and applicant's prior absence.

The respondent requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing because its mandatory annual food safety audit was scheduled for the same time.

The applicant opposed the request.

The Tribunal found that the mandatory audit constituted an extraordinary circumstance justifying the late adjournment request, particularly given the applicant's prior failure to attend mediation.

The adjournment was granted.

Wayne Inamoto v. Wildly Delicious Preserve Co. Ltd., 2016 HRTO 1372

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 21, 2016

Human rights application dismissed; assigning only male clients to male personal support worker not discriminatory.

The applicant, a male personal support worker, alleged that his employer discriminated against him on the basis of sex by refusing to assign him female clients for dressing and bathing care, and that his employment was terminated as a reprisal for claiming his human rights.

The Tribunal found that the employer's practice of accommodating female clients' requests for female personal support workers was not arbitrary and did not disadvantage the applicant, as male workers actually averaged more hours due to high demand.

The reprisal claim was also dismissed because the applicant's own evidence indicated he was constructively dismissed before he notified the employer of his human rights complaint.

Galuego v. Spectrum Health Care, 2016 HRTO 1367

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 14, 2016

Application against union dismissed at summary hearing for failing to link representation to Code grounds.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by his former employer and his union based on race, colour, ethnic origin, family status, and marital status.

The Tribunal directed a summary hearing to determine whether the application against the union respondent should be dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to allege or point to any evidence linking the union's failure to advance his grievance to arbitration to any Code-protected ground.

The application against the union was dismissed.

Gonzales v. Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc., 2016 HRTO 1340

Page 2 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom RabaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steven GerredSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Sean FlahertyCounsel
2 appearances
Corey ChandlerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
2 appearances
Ernst GoetzeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Najeem EbrahimiAgent
2 appearances
Richard ClarkeSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Matthew OrchardCounsel
1 appearance
C. April StewartAgent
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Shaheynoor TalukderCounsel
1 appearance
Lorraine PorCounsel
1 appearance
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance
Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
1 appearance
David TurnerCounsel
1 appearance
Richard WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Pranavan GaneshalingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter OsborneCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brennagh SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 2 of 29 (567 cases)