Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 13, 2012

Respondent deemed to have accepted human rights complaint allegations after failing to file a response.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination on the basis of family status after his employment was terminated for staying home to care for his children.

The respondent failed to file a response despite receiving notice and communicating with the Tribunal through its accountant.

The Tribunal deemed the respondent to have accepted all allegations in the application and waived its right to further notice or participation.

The applicant was directed to file further submissions and indicate whether he wished to attend a hearing to determine liability and remedy.

McDowell v. 1276458 Ontario Inc. o/a A Dark Horse, 2012 HRTO 2342

Adjournment of hearing granted due to applicant counsel's serious medical appointment.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the final day of the hearing because her counsel had an important medical appointment scheduled for that day.

The respondent opposed the request, citing previous delays caused by the applicant's counsel in scheduling.

The Tribunal found that the medical appointment constituted exceptional circumstances justifying an adjournment, despite the frustration it would cause the respondent.

The request to adjourn and reschedule the hearing was granted.

Cathy Moncur v. Beach Grove Golf and Country Club, 2012 HRTO 2335

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 6, 2012

Human rights application dismissed after applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The applicant filed a human rights application but failed to attend the scheduled hearing on the merits.

The respondents attended and requested the application be dismissed.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was aware of the hearing date but chose not to attend.

Given the resources expended by the respondents and the Tribunal, and the applicant's failure to provide evidence, the application was dismissed for non-attendance.

Balbontin v. Joyce Fruit Market Ltd., 2012 HRTO 2281

Stuart MacKay

11 cases2009–2025

Sean Flaherty

4 cases2012–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 29, 2012

Tribunal ordered third parties to produce applicant's medical records to facilitate expert testimony.

The applicant's expert witness was unable to testify because he could not access the applicant's medical records, which were held by third parties.

The hearing was adjourned.

To ensure the fair and expeditious resolution of the matter, the Tribunal ordered the London Health Sciences Centre and the respondent's disability insurer to produce the applicant's medical records to the applicant's counsel prior to the rescheduled hearing date.

Ian MacLeod by his Substitute Decision-Maker Shaune MacLeod v. The Corporation of the County of Lambton, 2012 HRTO 2241

Roy C. Filion

42 cases1980–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 11, 2012

Request to amend human rights application to add reprisal allegations denied due to delay.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to amend his human rights application to include two new allegations of reprisal.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the factors against granting the amendment outweighed those in favour.

Specifically, the applicant waited more than 10 weeks to file the request after the last alleged incident, and neither party had disclosed documents or witnesses regarding the new allegations in advance of the upcoming hearing.

The denial was without prejudice to the applicant's right to file a new application for the reprisal allegations.

Delaney v. Peel District School Board, 2012 HRTO 1936

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 4, 2012

Request to amend human rights application to add ground of disability granted.

The applicant filed an application alleging employment discrimination based on family status.

After reviewing the respondents' materials, the applicant requested to amend her application to include the ground of disability.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding that the amendment related to the same core event, flowed from the respondents' materials, and would not cause prejudice or negatively impact the hearing.

Monteiro v. CSDC Systems Inc., 2012 HRTO 1895

Peter Dailleboust

109 cases2007–2024

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 3, 2012

Tribunal denies request to defer human rights application pending grievance proceeding dealing with different issues.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of the applicant's human rights application pending the conclusion of two grievances filed on his behalf by his union.

The applicant opposed the deferral, arguing that the grievances dealt with pre-notice and severance entitlements under the collective agreement, while the human rights application alleged discrimination based on disability and age.

The Tribunal denied the deferral request, finding that although the proceedings flowed from the same event, they dealt with different issues.

Lessard v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2012 HRTO 1881

Melany Franklin

12 cases1991–2013

Antonella Ceddia

Practising Law - Employed42 cases2008–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 1, 2012

Motion for document production partially granted; requests for third-party service and adjournment denied.

The applicant, alleging racial profiling by police, brought a request for an order during proceedings seeking production of various documents, service on third parties, and an adjournment.

The respondent TPSB requested permission to have a court reporter record the hearing.

The Tribunal granted the production request only with respect to background checks conducted on the applicant, finding the other requested documents lacked arguable relevance.

The requests for service on third parties and adjournment were denied.

The request for a court reporter was granted on the condition that the transcript be shared with all parties and the Tribunal.

Selwyn Pieters v. Toronto Police Services Board and William Blair, 2012 HRTO 1863

Robert B. Bayne

2 cases2012–2019

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 25, 2012

Request to reactivate deferred human rights application denied because related WSIB proceedings remained ongoing.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the conclusion of an appeal before the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT).

The WSIAT had remitted the matter to the WSIB, which issued a decision on benefits.

However, the respondent indicated its intention to appeal the WSIB decision.

The Tribunal dismissed the request to reactivate, finding that the related proceedings under the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act were still ongoing and the reasons for deferral remained valid.

Parda v. Tycos Tool & Die, a Division of Magna Exteriors & Interiors Inc., 2012 HRTO 1836

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 21, 2012

Request to defer human rights application pending criminal proceeding dismissed due to advanced stage of hearing.

The organization respondent requested that the Tribunal defer the human rights application pending the conclusion of a criminal proceeding against the individual respondent for sexual assault.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, noting that the human rights proceeding commenced over two years before the criminal proceeding, three days of evidence had already been heard, and the applicant could not advance her human rights claims in the criminal proceeding.

A.S. v. Voysus Group Inc., 2012 HRTO 1815

Lorraine Por

6 cases2000–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 19, 2012

Two human rights applications regarding school accommodation consolidated due to common issues of fact and law.

The applicant, a student with disabilities, filed an Application for Contravention of Settlement alleging the school board breached a previous settlement regarding her accommodation.

Subsequently, a new Application was filed alleging discrimination with respect to services.

The Tribunal considered whether to consolidate the two Applications.

Finding common issues of fact and law, and no prejudice to the respondents, the Tribunal ordered the Applications consolidated and cancelled the scheduled hearing for the first Application to allow for a single hearing on the merits.

J.N. v. Thames Valley District School Board, 2012 HRTO 1777

Susan Ballantyne

16 cases1992–2013

Dan Shields

9 cases2011–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 13, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent union grievance and arbitration proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging reprisal after his employment was terminated following the deferral of his initial application.

The respondents requested that the application be deferred pending the conclusion of an ongoing union grievance and arbitration proceeding regarding the termination.

The union requested intervenor status.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene and deferred the application, noting that labour arbitrators have jurisdiction to apply the Human Rights Code and deferral avoids duplication of proceedings.

Joseph Esmama v. Carillion Services Canada, 2012 HRTO 1734

Erin Porter

15 cases2012–2021

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 12, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent WSIB proceeding regarding workplace injury accommodation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability after suffering a workplace back injury.

She also had an ongoing WSIB claim regarding her return to work and accommodation.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application pending the resolution of the WSIB proceeding.

The Tribunal found that deferral was appropriate because the WSIB claim and the human rights application were triggered by the same facts and there was a clear overlap between the issues, raising the potential for inconsistent findings.

The application was deferred.

Rose v. Revera Long Term Care Inc., 2012 HRTO 1728

Jim Dimovski

3 cases2012–2014

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 12, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent WSIB proceeding involving overlapping facts and issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and failure to accommodate his disability-related needs, leading to his termination.

He subsequently requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of his application pending the conclusion of a concurrent proceeding before the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB), which was reconsidering his entitlement to benefits and re-employment obligations.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding that deferral was the most fair, just, and expeditious way to proceed given the clear overlap in facts, issues, and remedies, and to avoid the possibility of inconsistent findings.

Keith v. GNI Management Group Inc., 2012 HRTO 1726

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 10, 2012

Human rights application dismissed at preliminary stage for failing to allege facts engaging Code-protected grounds.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging that the respondent library subjected him to reprisals by excluding him from the library after he complained about a security guard.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application did not allege that the respondent's behaviour was related to a protected ground under the Human Rights Code.

Finding that the applicant failed to allege facts coming within the scope of section 8 of the Code, the Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction.

Richard Toderan v. Toronto Public Library – Toronto Reference Library, 2012 HRTO 1700

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 6, 2012

Request for interim remedy dismissed as moot after respondent granted the requested accommodation.

The applicant, a student, filed an application alleging the respondent college failed to accommodate his disability and failed to intervene in harassment.

He also requested an interim remedy ordering immediate accommodation, specifically an extension of time for a project.

The respondent provided evidence that it had already granted the extension after the request was filed.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for an interim remedy as moot.

Collin Dolny v. Everest College of Business, Technology and Health Care – Toronto College Park, 2012 HRTO 1684

Marnie Corbold

17 cases1999–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 5, 2012

Human rights allegations from 2008-2009 dismissed as untimely; applicant failed to prove good faith delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability and reprisal by her employer.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed as untimely, as the alleged failure to accommodate occurred in 2008-2009, while the termination letter was sent in April 2011.

The Tribunal found the incidents did not constitute a series of incidents due to a gap of more than one year.

Furthermore, the Tribunal held that the applicant failed to provide sufficient medical evidence to prove her delay was incurred in good faith due to psychological difficulties.

The 2008-2009 allegations were dismissed, leaving only the April 2011 termination allegation to proceed.

Angela Olaski v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2012 HRTO 1678

Nancy Jammu-Taylor

15 cases2006–2020

Mary Jane Campigotto

In Private Practice6 cases2011–2014

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 4, 2012

Request to hold proceeding in abeyance denied; applicant ordered to provide hearing availability.

The applicant requested that her human rights application be held in abeyance pending the resolution of a related civil matter following a Court of Appeal decision.

The Tribunal denied the request, citing its duty to dispose of applications fairly and expeditiously, noting that any impact of the civil matter could be addressed through submissions later.

The Tribunal also ordered the applicant to provide her availability for an additional hearing day within one week, warning that her new reprisal allegation would be dismissed if she failed to comply.

Moncur v. Beach Grove Golf and Country Club, 2012 HRTO 1664

Sari Springer

31 cases1993–2017

Naomi Margo

6 cases2011–2025

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 31, 2012

Adjournment granted due to counsel's health withdrawal, subject to strict disclosure compliance conditions.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing after her legal counsel withdrew for health reasons.

The respondents opposed the request, noting the applicant's failure to comply with pre-hearing disclosure rules.

The Tribunal found that the counsel's withdrawal constituted an extraordinary circumstance justifying an adjournment.

However, given the unexplained failure to comply with disclosure rules prior to the withdrawal, the Tribunal imposed strict conditions requiring the applicant to provide document and witness lists within three weeks, failing which the application would be dismissed.

Shoaa Farhan T. Alshamari v. The Governing Council of the University of Toronto, 2012 HRTO 1656

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 29, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent school boards.

After a mediation failed to resolve the matter, the hearing was scheduled but later adjourned at the request of the respondents.

The Tribunal directed the applicant's next friend to provide her availability for rescheduled hearing dates.

Despite multiple emails, voicemails, and letters from the Tribunal warning that the application could be deemed abandoned, the applicant's next friend failed to respond.

The Tribunal found that this failure thwarted its process and dismissed the application as abandoned.

M.D. v. Toronto District School Board, 2012 HRTO 1649

Page 15 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Claudio MastroianniSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeremy MajorSelf-represented
1 appearance
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Shawn WestonAgent
2 appearances
Deolinda MarquesSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elzbieta SzylukSelf-represented
2 appearances
Juan ReyesSelf-represented
2 appearances
Glen MorrisonAgent
2 appearances
Civita GauleyCounsel
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance
Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Aaron CrangleCounsel
1 appearance
Alexander KowalCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Andy PushalikCounsel
1 appearance
Angela E. RaeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
John SaundersCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan L. DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Agnes WintersingerAgent
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance
André NowakowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew AshenhurstCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew CoxCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Bill MatharuSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance
David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance
Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance
David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance
Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 15 of 29 (567 cases)