J. Knight

The applicant sought to withdraw the application against the responding parties.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union filed an application alleging a sale of a business and related employer status, along with a grievance referral, against the responding parties.

The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued consent declarations that a sale of a business occurred under section 69 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, binding the successor employer to the collective agreement, and ordered the payment of $1,500 in settlement of the grievance.

The applicant sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding parties.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act.

The responding employer failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend within the required time.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.

The Board found the responding party bound by the Provincial Agreement and declared that it had violated the agreement.

A hearing was scheduled solely to assess damages.

The applicant union referred a grievance to arbitration under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 and requested a pre-hearing production order.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found the requested documents relevant to the issues in dispute and ordered the responding party to produce them, including contracts, tender documents, payroll records, and permits related to a specific job site.

The Board also directed the applicant to provide a statement of delivery for its request letter.

The applicant union filed an application under sections 69 and 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and referred a grievance to arbitration against the responding employers.

Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement.

The Board issued a consent order declaring the responding employers to be related employers bound by the applicable collective agreement.

The Board also ordered one of the responding employers to pay $2,000 in settlement and granted leave to withdraw the grievance referral.

The Board issued a procedural decision regarding a union certification application and related unfair labour practice complaints.

The Board determined that a single segregated ballot cast by an employee could not be counted, as doing so would reveal how the individual voted, violating the secrecy of the ballot.

Instead, the Board ordered a second representation vote.

The Board also dismissed the responding party's request to dismiss one of the complaints for failing to make out a prima facie case.

Further submissions were directed regarding the responding party's request to add two names to the voters list.

The applicant applied under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that the responding party trade union no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit.

The Board found the application to be timely and that at least forty percent of the employees expressed a wish not to be represented by the union.

Consequently, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support of not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with all ballots segregated and the ballot box sealed pending the resolution of whether the responding parties constitute a single employer for the purposes of the Act.

The applicant requested to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant requested an adjournment and a production order after the responding parties failed to appear at the scheduled hearing.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board adjourned the hearing and ordered the responding parties to produce required returns and payroll records pursuant to section 111 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a decision to correct an error in its previous decision dated January 4, 2000.

The Board revoked and replaced paragraph 9 of that decision, declaring that the responding party is bound by and violated the Carpenters' Provincial Collective Agreement, and ordering the payment of $354.20 in damages and $1,564.00 in costs.

The applicant union filed a grievance referral against the responding party.

The parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement on December 24, 1999.

Having regard to the terms of the agreement, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave for the application to be withdrawn.

The applicant union filed an application against the responding party.

On agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board adjourned the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, to be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made within that time.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The responding party employer failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.

The Board found that the employer violated the collective agreement by failing to provide records of employment and pay owed monies.

The Board ordered the employer to provide the records and pay damages and costs.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter would be deemed terminated if no party requested to proceed.

The parties agreed to adjourn the applications sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the applications will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the responding party failed to pay wages and benefits to an employee.

The responding party failed to file a Request for Hearing and Notice of Intent to Defend.

Pursuant to the Board's Rules of Procedure, the responding party was deemed to have accepted all facts stated in the application.

The Board found the responding party bound by the collective agreement, declared a violation, and ordered payment of damages and costs.

The applicant union filed an application for a related employer and sale of business declaration, and referred a grievance to arbitration.

The responding employers failed to file any response.

The Board noted its authority under the Rules of Procedure to deem the facts accepted and proceed without a hearing.

However, because the applicant had not verified that the required notices to affected employees had been posted by the responding parties, the Board adjourned the matter.

The applicant was directed to provide information regarding the employees or verify the posting within 10 days, failing which the application would be dismissed.