J. Knight

The applicant union sought to add new responding parties and adjourn the section 133 application sine die in order to file a related application under sections 1(4) and 69 of the Labour Relations Act.

The responding parties did not appear.

The Board granted the request, added the new responding parties, and adjourned the matter sine die.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the matter sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The responding party failed to file a response within the stipulated time.

The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support and directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees in the proposed bargaining unit.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, requesting a determination without a hearing.

The Board noted a discrepancy between the applicant's name and the name on the collective agreement provided.

Consequently, the Board declined to issue a default decision and set the matter down for a hearing to address the issue.

The applicant referred a grievance to the Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into a memorandum of agreement.

The Board issued declarations and directions on consent, finding that the responding party was bound by the collective agreement and had violated it.

The responding party was ordered to pay $6,200 in damages as full and final settlement.

The applicant union and responding employer entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the responding party to pay $15,523.11 to the Tile Employee Bargaining Agency and $17,219.91 to Local 7, in addition to damages previously ordered.

The application was adjourned sine die for up to one year.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the grievance referral sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.

The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

On the scheduled hearing date, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement settling the matter.

The Board issued a consent order declaring that the responding party was bound by the collective agreement, had violated it by failing to pay benefits and using non-union workers, and ordered the payment of $11,962.68 in damages and costs.

The applicant union filed a grievance referral against the responding party employer.

On the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

On the scheduled hearing date, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement.

The Board issued a consent order declaring that the responding party is bound by the collective agreement, violated its terms, and must pay $1,450 in costs, with the matter adjourned to a later date.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.

The applicant sought to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

On the agreement of the parties, the Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.

The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to the Board.

When the responding party failed to appear at the scheduled hearing, the applicant requested an arrest warrant for a principal of the responding party who had been properly served with a summons and conduct money.

The Board found that the witness's presence and documents were material to the ends of justice.

Pursuant to its powers under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, the Board issued an arrest warrant to compel the witness's attendance at the continuation of the hearing.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the matter.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the adjournment with leave and rescheduled the hearing.

The panel is not seized.

The applicant, Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 183, sought to withdraw its applications against the responding parties, The Atlas Corporation and Tectonic Infrastructure Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the applications were withdrawn.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support of not less than forty per cent in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board defined the appropriate bargaining unit and directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees.

The applicant sought to withdraw its applications against the responding parties.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the applications.

The applicant union filed an application alleging a sale of a business and related employer status, along with a grievance referral, against the responding parties.

The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued consent declarations that a sale of a business occurred under section 69 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, binding the successor employer to the collective agreement, and ordered the payment of $1,500 in settlement of the grievance.