Ena Chadha is a adjudicator at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Adjudicator

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Adjudicator·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Brian P. Smeenk

34 cases1982–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 13, 2010

Reconsideration request denied as untimely and failing to meet the threshold criteria.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application under section 53(8) of the Code.

The Tribunal denied the request for reconsideration because it was filed more than two months after the 30-day deadline and the applicant provided no explanation for the delay.

Furthermore, the Tribunal found that even if the request had been timely, it did not meet the criteria for reconsideration as it merely attempted to re-argue the same issues without presenting new determinative evidence or demonstrating a conflict with established jurisprudence.

Florips Bajouco v. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Bronwen Morgan, 2010 HRTO 1518

Jo-Anne Pickel

13 cases2007–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 13, 2010

Reconsideration request denied as untimely and failing to meet threshold criteria.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed her application under section 53(8) of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal denied the request for reconsideration because it was filed beyond the 30-day deadline without explanation.

Furthermore, the Tribunal found that even if timely, the request did not meet the criteria under Rule 26, as the applicant merely sought to re-argue her case and presented no new determinative facts or evidence.

Bajouco v. Ontario Nurses’ Association, 2010 HRTO 1510

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 13, 2010

Tribunal declined to determine early dismissal request regarding hospital liability before a full response was filed.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination in the provision of health services by the respondent hospital.

The respondent requested early dismissal of the application, arguing it was not liable for the actions of individual medical practitioners.

The Tribunal declined to determine the liability issue at a preliminary stage, noting that a full response is generally required to assess the facts and legal relationships involved.

The respondent was directed to file a complete response.

Dorosz v. Kingston General Hospital, 2010 HRTO 1523

Raymond Bogg

1 case2010–2010

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 9, 2010

Extension of time granted for incarcerated applicant to respond to early dismissal request.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on creed.

The respondents filed a Request for Early Dismissal, arguing the matter was previously dealt with by the Commission and was out of time.

The applicant, who was incarcerated and seeking legal representation, requested an extension of time to respond to the dismissal request.

The Tribunal granted a two-week extension, finding no prejudice to the respondents.

Mertick v. Office of the Registrar General, 2010 HRTO 1501

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 8, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to jurisdictional inquiry.

The applicant filed an Application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of record of offences.

The Tribunal noted that the narrative failed to identify any alleged discrimination related to a record of offences as defined under the Code, and directed the applicant to provide written submissions on jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond within the specified timeline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the Application abandoned and dismissed it.

Courtney Alistair v. Extreme Fitness, Declan Boyle, Naresh Persuad and Michael Slack, 2010 HRTO 1472

Justin Heimpel

24 cases2010–2024

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 8, 2010

Human rights application alleging sex discrimination and harassment dismissed due to lack of credible evidence.

The applicant alleged that she was subjected to derogatory conduct and comments related to her gender by a co-worker, and that the employer failed to take appropriate action, forcing her to resign.

The Tribunal found the applicant's evidence lacked credibility and preferred the respondents' evidence that the workplace conflicts stemmed from work performance issues rather than gender.

The Tribunal concluded that the applicant failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination or harassment on the basis of sex, and dismissed the application.

Marshall v. G & A Lock and Security Service, 2010 HRTO 1479

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 7, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending completion of related union grievances.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of disability.

The respondents requested that the application be deferred pending the completion of three outstanding union grievances that raised related matters.

The Tribunal found significant overlap between the application and the grievances, which had been referred to arbitration.

The Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievances and declined to rule on the respondents' additional requests to dismiss part of the application and remove the applicant's representative at this stage.

Douglas v. St. Joseph’s Health Care Centre, 2010 HRTO 1481

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 7, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to jurisdictional inquiry.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination in the area of goods, services, and facilities.

The Tribunal issued a notice indicating that the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction because the narrative failed to identify specific acts of age discrimination, and directed the applicant to provide written submissions.

The applicant failed to respond within the required 35-day period.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Hunt v. Bomb Shelter Pub, 2010 HRTO 1480

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 5, 2010

Tribunal directs respondents to file late Response and requests submissions on naming individual adjudicator.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability regarding the respondents' policy on fibromyalgia.

The respondents failed to file a Response within the required timeframe.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondents to file a Response within 14 days, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice.

The Tribunal also directed the parties to provide written submissions on whether the unnamed individual adjudicator should remain a personal respondent.

Goldman v. Ontario (Community and Social Services) (No. 1), 2010 HRTO 1432

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 5, 2010

Human rights application allowed to proceed despite delay due to applicant's mental health issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of disability, approximately two years after his employment ended.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss due to the delay.

The applicant submitted that the delay was incurred in good faith due to his mental health following the murder of his common-law spouse and his initial pursuit of an Employment Standards claim.

The Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the delay was not incurred in good faith and allowed the application to proceed.

Atherton v. 1022756 Ontario, 2010 HRTO 1464

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 29, 2010

Tribunal scheduled preliminary hearing to determine if application should be dismissed based on prior grievance settlement.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The respondent requested early dismissal, arguing the applicant had signed a full and final release during a grievance mediation.

The applicant alleged he signed the release under duress.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene and directed that a preliminary hearing be scheduled to determine whether the application should be dismissed based on the release or section 45.1 of the Code.

Andrews v. Hamilton (City), 2010 HRTO 1418

Tribunal finds selective enforcement of hard hat rule and harassment against Sikh security guard.

The complainant, a Sikh security guard who wears a turban, was assigned to a Home Depot construction site.

The assistant store manager ordered him to wear a hard hat and, when the complainant refused due to his religious beliefs, ordered him to leave the premises.

The Tribunal found that the hard hat rule was selectively enforced against the complainant, as other workers were permitted in the same areas without hard hats.

The Tribunal also found that the assistant store manager subjected the complainant to discriminatory harassment by goading him to remove his turban and taunting him with termination.

The hearing was bifurcated, with the duty to accommodate and occupational health and safety issues deferred to a second stage.

Loomba v. Home Depot Canada Inc. (No. 2), 2010 HRTO 1434

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 23, 2010

Respondent deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on sex (pregnancy).

The respondent failed to file a Response within the required timeframe and ignored a subsequent Interim Decision directing it to do so.

The Tribunal ordered that the respondent is deemed to have waived all rights to notice or participation in the proceedings and is deemed to have accepted all allegations in the application pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The Tribunal will proceed to determine the application based on the applicant's materials.

Amanda Bickell v. The Country Grill, 2010 HRTO 1408

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 4, 2010

Request to dismiss human rights application denied as Employment Insurance board did not consider discrimination issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of disability after his employment was terminated for refusing to undergo drug and alcohol testing.

The respondent requested early dismissal under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that a Board of Referees under the Employment Insurance Act had already determined the applicant was terminated for misconduct.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the Board of Referees expressly declined to consider the human rights issues.

The Tribunal directed the parties to provide further submissions on whether the application should be deferred pending the applicant's appeal to the Office of the Umpire.

Napash v. URS Canadian Operations Ltd., 2010 HRTO 1281

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 4, 2010

Adjournment request denied as personal travel plans do not constitute exceptional circumstances.

The respondents requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing dates, citing travel disruptions expected from the G20 Summit in Toronto and the applicant's consent due to her son's travel plans.

The Tribunal relocated the hearing to Guelph to address the G20 concerns.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment request, finding that the applicant's son's travel plans did not constitute exceptional circumstances and noting the request was made well beyond the five-day period following the Notice of Hearing.

Melissa Marshall v. G & A Lock and Security Service Ltd. and Raymond Charron, 2010 HRTO 1285

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2010

Human rights application deferred on consent pending resolution of related WSIB appeal.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and sex, and requested that the application be deferred pending the resolution of a related WSIB appeal.

The respondent consented to the deferral request.

The Tribunal granted the request and deferred the application, noting the overlap in issues and the WSIB's expertise in addressing disability matters.

Paula Moulton v. Skyjack Inc., 2010 HRTO 1250

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 2, 2010

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as respondent is a federally regulated business.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of record of offences and race or ethnic origin.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed because it is a federally regulated business involved in processing banking transactions.

The applicant conceded the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction but requested the matter be referred to the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

The Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction and noted it has no authority to refer applications to other adjudicative bodies.

Sheldon Yang v. Symcor Inc., 2010 HRTO 1241

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 2, 2010

Request for early dismissal denied as WSIB and Employment Standards proceedings did not address human rights accommodation issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability after being laid off following a work-related injury.

The respondents requested early dismissal under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the matter was appropriately dealt with by the WSIB and Employment Standards.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the WSIB's application of its re-employment policy and the payment of termination pay did not appropriately deal with the human rights substance of the application, specifically the duty to accommodate.

The Tribunal directed the parties to provide further submissions on whether the application should be deferred pending the completion of the WSIB process.

Ana Olliver v. Taylor Electronic Services Inc., Dave Taylor and Liz Taylor, 2010 HRTO 1248

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 28, 2010

Request to dismiss human rights application denied as subject-matter differed from spouse's previous complaint.

The respondents requested the early dismissal of a human rights application under section 53(8) of the Human Rights Code, arguing it was substantially the same as a previous complaint filed by the applicant's spouse.

The Tribunal found that the current application, which alleged discrimination based on marital status and disability regarding inquiries made to the spouse's disability insurer, was not substantially the same as the spouse's employment accommodation complaint.

The request to dismiss was denied.

Linda Saxon v. Amherstburg Police Services Board and Tim Berthiaume, 2010 HRTO 1204

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 30, 2009

Tribunal orders Commission to produce facts on prior complaint and sets schedule for preliminary issues.

In an interim decision, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario addressed various procedural requests from the parties.

The Tribunal directed the Ontario Human Rights Commission to produce a statement of facts regarding the applicant's previous complaint.

The Tribunal also set new timelines for the respondents to file submissions on preliminary issues, including delay, jurisdiction, and whether the substance of the application was dealt with in another proceeding, and for the applicant to file reply submissions.

The applicant was directed to file a Request for Order During Proceedings if he wished to amend his application.

William Thomson v. Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation and Ontario Labour Relations Board, 2009 HRTO 2272

Page 39 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 39 of 44 (867 cases)

Brian P. Smeenk

Ena Chadha

Florips Bajouco v. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Bronwen Morgan, 2010 HRTO 1518

Jo-Anne Pickel

Ena Chadha

Bajouco v. Ontario Nurses’ Association, 2010 HRTO 1510

Ena Chadha

Dorosz v. Kingston General Hospital, 2010 HRTO 1523

Raymond Bogg

Ena Chadha

Mertick v. Office of the Registrar General, 2010 HRTO 1501

Ena Chadha

Courtney Alistair v. Extreme Fitness, Declan Boyle, Naresh Persuad and Michael Slack, 2010 HRTO 1472

Justin Heimpel

Ena Chadha

Marshall v. G & A Lock and Security Service, 2010 HRTO 1479

Ena Chadha

Douglas v. St. Joseph’s Health Care Centre, 2010 HRTO 1481

Ena Chadha

Hunt v. Bomb Shelter Pub, 2010 HRTO 1480

Ena Chadha

Goldman v. Ontario (Community and Social Services) (No. 1), 2010 HRTO 1432

Ena Chadha

Atherton v. 1022756 Ontario, 2010 HRTO 1464

Ena Chadha

Andrews v. Hamilton (City), 2010 HRTO 1418

Raj Anand

Michael Dunn

Kevin MacNeill

Anthony Griffin

Ena Chadha

Loomba v. Home Depot Canada Inc. (No. 2), 2010 HRTO 1434

Ena Chadha

Amanda Bickell v. The Country Grill, 2010 HRTO 1408

Ena Chadha

Napash v. URS Canadian Operations Ltd., 2010 HRTO 1281

Ena Chadha

Melissa Marshall v. G & A Lock and Security Service Ltd. and Raymond Charron, 2010 HRTO 1285

Ena Chadha

Paula Moulton v. Skyjack Inc., 2010 HRTO 1250

Ena Chadha

Sheldon Yang v. Symcor Inc., 2010 HRTO 1241

Ena Chadha

Ana Olliver v. Taylor Electronic Services Inc., Dave Taylor and Liz Taylor, 2010 HRTO 1248

Ena Chadha

Linda Saxon v. Amherstburg Police Services Board and Tim Berthiaume, 2010 HRTO 1204

Ena Chadha

William Thomson v. Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation and Ontario Labour Relations Board, 2009 HRTO 2272

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

for Michael Watson

for Mohammed Manjra

for OPSEU

for Paul Cohn

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

for Stanley Klimitz

for Stan Mei

for the Affected Party

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75