Hearing adjourned on consent of the parties.
The applicant sought an adjournment of the hearing.
Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Board adjourned the hearing to a date to be set by the Registrar.
Union decertified following a representation vote where a majority of employees voted in opposition.
The applicant applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.
Application adjourned sine die for up to two years on consent of the parties.
The applicant brought an application against the responding union.
On the agreement of the parties, the Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding two years.
Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as the employer is federally regulated.
The applicant filed an application alleging a breach of the duty of fair representation under section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The employer submitted that its labour relations were federally regulated, as the union was certified by the Federal Labour Relations Board and the employer held extra-provincial trucking licenses.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found it lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the application.
Board orders representation vote with four options in competing union certification applications at Sobeys.
The Board conducted a consultation to determine the arrangements for a representation vote in competing certification applications by UFCW Canada and CAW-Canada for employees at Sobeys.
The Board ordered a representation vote to be held on December 20, 2001, with a voting constituency of all employees in the Regional Municipality of Durham serving the Sobeys account, subject to certain exclusions.
The ballot will include options for CAW-Canada, District 2A, UFCW Canada, and no union.
The Board directed that part-time and full-time employees vote separately and that disputed employees' ballots be segregated.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant, Ontario Nurses' Association, sought to withdraw its application against the responding parties.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Application adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed.
The applicant sought to withdraw her application against the responding party union.
Employment standards application terminated following parties' execution of Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant filed an employment standards application against the responding parties.
The parties subsequently entered into Minutes of Settlement.
Having regard to the settlement, the Ontario Labour Relations Board terminated the application.
Union certified as bargaining agent following a successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party child care centre.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.
The applicant, Riverside Fabricating Limited, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party union.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Representation vote ordered in certification application; majority declines to seal ballot box despite employer's section 8.1 notice.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The majority of the Board found that the applicant established sufficient membership support to order a representation vote and directed that the vote be held.
The majority declined to seal the ballot box.
The dissenting Board member would have directed the ballot box to be sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.
The applicant, John Foote, sought to withdraw his application against the Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 506.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Board cancels representation vote and schedules consultation to determine ballot form and new vote date.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board cancelled a representation vote scheduled for December 14, 2001, noting agreement among the parties that the date was unsuitable.
Due to the volume of submissions and issues regarding ballot configuration, the Board scheduled a consultation for December 17, 2001, to hear submissions on the form of the ballot and the new date for the vote.
Representation vote directed in application for certification.
The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.
The Board found the applicant to be a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, based on a previous Registrar's certificate.
Finding that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken.
Representation vote cancelled and rescheduled to allow CAW to be added to the ballot.
The CAW requested to be added to the ballot for a representation vote among part-time employees.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board determined there was insufficient time to amend the ballot for the vote scheduled that day.
To ensure the vote reflected the true wishes of the employees and to avoid future litigation, the Board cancelled the scheduled vote and ordered a new vote to be held three days later.
Representation vote rescheduled on agreement of the parties.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a decision on agreement of the parties to cancel a representation vote scheduled for December 12, 2001, and reschedule it to December 13, 2001.
All other conditions from the Board's previous decision remained the same.
Board corrects previous decision and adjusts poll times for representation vote.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a decision to correct an inadvertent error in its previous decision dated December 10, 2001.
The Board deleted paragraph 3 of the prior decision, confirmed that the applicant appeared to have the required 40 percent support based on the material filed, and directed that the polls for the representation vote remain open from 4:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.