Bram Herlich is a vice-chair at the Ontario Labour Relations Board with 301 decisions on record from 1990 to 2001. Key areas include employment and labour law, other tribunals, administrative law.

What tribunal does Bram Herlich sit on?

Bram Herlich sits on the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

What areas of law does Bram Herlich decide?

Bram Herlich's most common areas include Employment and Labour Law (301 decisions), Other Tribunals (58 decisions), Administrative Law (55 decisions). Bram Herlich has handled 301 decisions across 5 areas.

How many decisions has Bram Herlich made?

Bram Herlich has 301 decisions on record from 1990 to 2001.

Who frequently appears before Bram Herlich?

Representatives who frequently appear before Bram Herlich include Grainne McGrath, Alicia Gordon-Fagan, Mark A. Stone.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Bram Herlich — Vice-Chair

Employment and Labour Law

Bram Herlich

Vice-Chair·Ontario Labour Relations Board·Since 1990

301

cases · 12 yrs · OLRB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-Chair· 161Vice-Chair· 67Vice-Chair· 60Adjudicator/Referee· 9Vice-Chair· Chair· 2Referee· 1Vice‑Chair· 1

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Style of cause amended to reflect the proper name of the applicant.

The responding party raised a preliminary objection regarding the applicant's name.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board amended the style of cause to reflect the proper name of the applicant: 'International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Construction Council of Ontario'.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Construction Council of Ontario v. Tricin Electric Ltd., 2001 CanLII 6126

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Board directed the responding party to serve its covering letter on the other parties.

The responding party trade union filed its response along with a covering letter raising several concerns.

As it was unclear whether the covering letter had been copied to the other parties, the Board directed the union to deliver copies of the letter to the other parties to ensure they were apprised of the concerns.

Frederick Jim Cousins v. CAW Local 27, 2001 CanLII 3718

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Application withdrawn by leave of the Board.

The applicant sought to withdraw his application against the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Robert Freeman v. Ventra Plastics, 2001 CanLII 6160

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Application to terminate bargaining rights dismissed because supporting letters were signed by proxy.

The applicant sought a declaration terminating the bargaining rights of the responding trade union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application because the supporting material consisted of letters signed on behalf of employees by a different employee, rather than by the employees themselves.

This proxy signing violated Rule 71 of the Board's Rules of Procedure, meaning the applicant failed to demonstrate that 40 percent or more of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the union.

Extendicare (Canada) Port Stanley v. Service Employees International Union, Local 220, Part-Time Registered Nurses, 2001 CanLII 5093

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Union certification granted following a successful representation vote.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Union Cleaners Limited, 2001 CanLII 8860

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Union certification application dismissed after failing to secure majority support in representation vote.

The applicant union applied for certification.

A representation vote was held, but the union failed to obtain more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit.

As no statement of desire to make representations was filed, the Board dismissed the application and cancelled the previously set meeting and hearing dates.

Teamsters Local Union No. 419 v. Associated Freezers Corporation, 2001 CanLII 9735

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Union certified as bargaining agent following successful representation vote.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statement of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon unit of employees at Eric Flooring and Wood Products.

Industrial Wood & Allied Workers of Canada, (I.W.A. Canada) v. Eric Flooring and Wood Products, 2001 CanLII 14558

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Board directs representation vote in application for termination of bargaining rights.

The applicant applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration terminating the responding party's bargaining rights.

The Board found the application timely and that not less than forty percent of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the trade union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

Extendicare (Canada) Port Stanley v. Service Employees International Union, Local 220 Registered Nurses (Full-Time), 2001 CanLII 17786

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Union certification application dismissed after representation vote failed to achieve majority support.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where not more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.

The Board directed the parties' attention to section 10(3) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 regarding any future applications for certification.

Teamsters Local Union No. 419 v. Associated Freezers Corporation, 2001 CanLII 12684

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Application withdrawn by leave of the Board.

The applicant, Sharon Tracey, sought to withdraw her application against The Corporation of the Town of Tecumseh and The Canadian Union of Public Employees, CUPE Local 702.1.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Sharon Tracey v. The Corporation of the Town of Tecumseh, 2001 CanLII 8262

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Application withdrawn by leave of the Board.

The applicant sought leave to withdraw her application against the responding party union, with the hospital as an intervenor.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Julie Thomson v. OPSEU, Local #472, 2001 CanLII 13505

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Applicant directed to provide requested particulars or file submissions explaining why it should not.

The responding party requested particulars from the applicant trade union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the applicant to either provide the requested particulars within 10 days or file submissions explaining why it should not be required to do so.

International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, Local 1819 v. Regal Aluminum (1993) Inc., 2001 CanLII 19433

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Board issues consent order revoking prior certificate and directing representation vote based on settlement.

The applicant union filed an application for certification.

The parties executed Minutes of Settlement agreeing to revoke a prior certificate issued to an intervenor employee association, declaring their collective agreement invalid under section 53 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and directing a representation vote.

The Board issued a consent order incorporating the settlement terms, revoked the prior certificate, and directed a representation vote.

Teamsters Local Union 91 v. Glopak Inc., 2001 CanLII 21294

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Application withdrawn by leave of the Board.

The applicant requested to withdraw the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Slavka Ivcec v. Windsor Typographical Local Union 30553, 2001 CanLII 8002

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Applicant union directed to respond to employer's request for conditions on withdrawal of certification application.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application for certification.

The responding employer requested that the Board impose conditions on the withdrawal pursuant to sections 7(8) and 7(9) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board directed the applicant to respond to the employer's request within five days.

International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, Local 1819 v. Regal Aluminum (1993) Inc., 2001 CanLII 12721

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Representation vote ordered in union certification application; ballot box sealed due to section 8.1 notice.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.

The Board ordered a representation vote to be held.

Because the responding party filed a notice under section 8.1 of the Act disputing the applicant's estimate of the number of individuals in the unit, the Board directed that the ballot box be sealed.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation & General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Weston Foods Inc. c.o.b. as Crissa Bakery Corp., 2001 CanLII 6791

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 2001

Application withdrawn by leave of the Board.

The applicant, Teamsters Local Union 91, sought to withdraw its application against Glopak Inc. and the Union of Employees of Glopak.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Teamsters Local Union 91 v. Glopak Inc. and Union of Employees of Glopak, 2001 CanLII 2889

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 9, 2001

Representation vote directed in application for certification after union demonstrated requisite 40 percent membership support.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that it appeared to have the requisite 40 percent membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

The Board also provided directions regarding segregated ballots for disputed positions and the posting of notices.

United Steelworkers of America v. Sico Industrial Coatings, Inc., 2001 CanLII 16001

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 9, 2001

Union application withdrawn by leave of the Board.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Locals 1521, 2862 and 3826 v. Ottawa Carleton Association for Persons with Developmental Disabilities, 2001 CanLII 3384

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 9, 2001

Union decertified following representation vote where majority of employees opposed the union.

The applicant applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.

Anil Kumar v. C.A.W. #252, 2001 CanLII 19751

Page 5 of 16 (301 cases)

for Airline Limousine

Mark A. StoneCounsel
2 appearances
Nick LeimonisAgent
2 appearances

for Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1703

Emile DagherUnion representative
2 appearances
Cynthia D. WatsonCounsel
2 appearances

for Beaver Lumber Company Limited

Matt CertosimoCounsel
1 appearance

for Conseil scolaire de district catholique centre-sud

Yvan O’ConnorAgent
1 appearance

for CUPE Local One

Vic DemeloUnion representative
1 appearance
Doug LefaiveUnion representative
1 appearance

for Front End Specialists

Cathy PortuondoAgent
1 appearance
Arsenio PortuondoAgent
1 appearance

for Ginoogaming First Nation

A. RasevychCounsel
1 appearance

for Glopak Inc.

Jacques GirouxAgent
1 appearance

for himself

Carlos E. MarchSelf-represented
1 appearance

for James Gingerich

Derrick BewsterAgent
1 appearance
James GingerichSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kimberly Clark Forest Products Inc.

R. E. MannistoCounsel
1 appearance

for Linamar Company, Vehcom Manufacturing

Peter JovanovichAgent
1 appearance
Chris MacRaeAgent
1 appearance
D. Brent LabordCounsel
1 appearance

for Long Lake Employees Association and Ginoogaming First Nation

John EricksonCounsel
1 appearance

for Long Lake Forest Products Inc.

T. E. InglisCounsel
1 appearance
F.J. W. BickfordCounsel
1 appearance

for Ministry of Labour

Karima ChaturCounsel
1 appearance

for Morrison’s Auto Body & Sales

Randy MorrisonAgent
1 appearance

for Roch Drouin

Louise LacasseAgent
1 appearance
Roch DrouinSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Teamsters Local Union 91

A. PapineauUnion representative
1 appearance

for the applicant

E. R. (Ted) DurhamAgent
1 appearance
H. KopytoAgent
1 appearance
Chris FioreAgent
1 appearance
John AmanUnion representative
1 appearance
Hendrik KeesmaatAgent
1 appearance
Bert PoulinCounsel
1 appearance
James R. EvansAgent
1 appearance
Brian MikulinskiCounsel
1 appearance
Eugenia CappetteroAgent
1 appearance
Michael John FergusonAgent
1 appearance
Bill RoterAgent
1 appearance
Rob GibsonUnion representative
1 appearance
Ed. OgizowskiAgent
1 appearance
B. JamesCounsel
1 appearance
Brian FeilUnion representative
1 appearance
Selwyn BeltonAgent
1 appearance
Hagar PrahAgent
1 appearance
Jeff EleveldAgent
1 appearance
Gabriel AzmitiaAgent
1 appearance
Mike McCrearvCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Bienvenido T. PascoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emmanuel AbegunrinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Afifi KhalilSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rick OverendSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kevin HayesSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the applicants

Raja WysockiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira KatzSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dave HepworthAgent
1 appearance
Howard CadeskySelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet van den HeuvelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tim HanniganCounsel
1 appearance
Ed J. HolmesCounsel
1 appearance
Charles WilburnSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shelley Robinson-FoleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Reneé LégerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Diane MargisAgent
1 appearance
Joffre BerubéSelf-represented
1 appearance
Harriet KatzAgent
1 appearance
Richard BosadaAgent
1 appearance
Allen OuelletteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Graham SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Heather MacKinnonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the applicants in Board File 2185-97-R

Nick PapaioannouSelf-represented
1 appearance
David PeeverSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees

Dave BanksUnion representative
1 appearance
James KeenanUnion representative
1 appearance

for the CAW Canada

Lewis GottheilCounsel
1 appearance

for the complainant

Anthony MaiheiroAgent
1 appearance
Jos 2i MartinsAgent
1 appearance
Manuel MartinsAgent
1 appearance
H. John BarnesSelf-represented
1 appearance
L. E. LeblancAgent
1 appearance

for the employee

Mia LondonCounsel
1 appearance
Elisabeth BruckmannCounsel
1 appearance

for the employer

Maura PelletierAgent
1 appearance
Kaleem AhmadCounsel
1 appearance
Paul DellemanAgent
1 appearance
Christopher LeafloorCounsel
1 appearance
Ken HughesAgent
1 appearance

for the Employer

Ron SpeightAgent
1 appearance

for the employer SACCK

Maureen AddieAgent
1 appearance

for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 636

Harold G. VanceUnion representative
1 appearance

for the intervenor

Elizabeth BlundenCounsel
1 appearance
Paul DeBuonoCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia G. MurrayAgent
1 appearance
Dolores BarbiniCounsel
1 appearance
Peter VanderkloetUnion representative
1 appearance
John L. StoutCounsel
1 appearance
David WhiteCounsel
1 appearance
Marianne ChandlerAgent
1 appearance
Mike AzizCounsel
1 appearance
John MorrisonCounsel
1 appearance
Janice CarneyAgent
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Peter ChauvinAgent
1 appearance
Craig WallaceAgent
1 appearance
Lynn MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Carole HoglundAgent
1 appearance
Graham WellsCounsel
1 appearance
Victor TrotmanAgent
1 appearance
Fred Von VehCounsel
1 appearance
Lith MartellAgent
1 appearance

for the Intervenors (the Skilled Trades Employees)

Dennis CharbonneauAgent
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Labour

Grainne McGrathCounsel
3 appearances
Alicia Gordon-FaganCounsel
3 appearances
L. EisenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Jeremy WarningCounsel
2 appearances
Murray KleinCounsel
2 appearances
Karima ChaturAgent
2 appearances
Mark ShurvinCounsel
1 appearance
Karen NortheyCounsel
1 appearance
Frank CamilleriCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce ArnottCounsel
1 appearance
K. LivingstoneCounsel
1 appearance
Dan BeaulieuAgent
1 appearance
Heidi Ann Lazar-MeynCounsel
1 appearance
Mircho MirchevAgent
1 appearance
Karima ChaturCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

James D. ChurchAgent
1 appearance
A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance
Nancy A. EberCounsel
1 appearance
B. CarrozziAgent
1 appearance
Gino San giovanniAgent
1 appearance
Russel ZinnCounsel
1 appearance
Peter BourqueAgent
1 appearance

for the responding parties

Joe TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Bob MasonCounsel
1 appearance
Ted PorterSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the responding party

Dr. Peter SimpsonUnion representative
1 appearance
Ian B. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance
Sharon SteckleyAgent
1 appearance
Maurice GreenCounsel
1 appearance
S. HerseUnion representative
1 appearance
S.B.D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance
N. L. JesinCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia RossAgent
1 appearance
Lorne CarterCounsel
1 appearance
Greg MichalukUnion representative
1 appearance
John ColettiCounsel
1 appearance
Jim ForsterAgent
1 appearance
Dave EllulUnion representative
1 appearance
Eugene KoszikaCounsel
1 appearance
Craig MitchelCounsel
1 appearance
Robert GibsonUnion representative
1 appearance
Richard VerrierAgent
1 appearance
Jack AudnadeAgent
1 appearance
Brian WrightAgent
1 appearance
David JewittCounsel
1 appearance

for the responding party Times Fiber Canada Ltd.

John MartelliAgent
1 appearance
Barry HoltAgent
1 appearance
Lillian DunbarAgent
1 appearance

for the SEIU Local 663

Garry ThayerUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Union

John MifsudUnion representative
1 appearance

for Toronto Hydro-Electric Commission

Glen RawsonAgent
1 appearance
Sharon HallAgent
1 appearance
E. C. Carla ZabekCounsel
1 appearance

for Westario Power Services Inc., Westario Power Inc., and Westario Power Holdings Inc.

Guy CluffAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Norampac Inc

Stephen BullAgent
1 appearance
Fiona SterlingAgent
1 appearance
Toni LionettiAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the applicant

Rita QuonSelf-represented
2 appearances
J. S. CliffeAgent
1 appearance
J. S. CliffeCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of the applicants in Board File 2185-97-R

David PeeverSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nick PapaioannouSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of the intervenor

Leslee WillsAgent
1 appearance
Shane SmithAgent
1 appearance
David IrvineAgent
1 appearance
Andy AndersonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Ministry of Labour

Jeremy WarningCounsel
2 appearances
L. EisenbergCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie EisenbergCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of the responding parties Marie Estrelita Castro and Aledin Castro

Columbia DiazAgent
1 appearance
Aledin M. CastroSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of the responding party

Rob HobbsUnion representative
1 appearance
Don WarnerUnion representative
1 appearance
Tom DattilolUnion representative
1 appearance
Geoff DalzielUnion representative
1 appearance
Shawn WilliamsUnion representative
1 appearance
Thomas ParkUnion representative
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Danusia SzpakSelf-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf

Douglas L. CritchSelf-represented
1 appearance
Walter F. PintoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug MaySelf-represented
1 appearance
A. George DragoneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ed FroomeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ross McBrideSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hector (Chuck) DepelteauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom JohnstonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter PleasantSelf-represented
1 appearance
John SteadmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barry WeislederSelf-represented
1 appearance

on their own behalf

Susan GilbertSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerald DiakowSelf-represented
1 appearance

301

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

2.2

cases/mo

OLRB301(100%)

Decision types

motion

227

trial

appeal

Page 5 of 16 (301 cases)