Anthony Brown

Following the dismissal of an application, the responding party requested that the Board consider making an order for costs against the applicant union.

The Board declined to entertain argument on the issue, noting that a final decision had already been issued and that the Board has previously determined it lacks jurisdiction to award costs.

The applicant applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of Lewisfoods Inc.

The applicant union applied for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application for certification and drew attention to the potential one-year bar on subsequent applications under section 10(3) of the Act.

The applicant requested to withdraw its applications before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted leave and the applications were withdrawn.

The applicant union requested to withdraw its application for certification following the taking of a representation vote.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application effective June 8, 2001, and noted that the effect of subsection 7(10) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 on any subsequent applications would be determined if and when such an application is made.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicants filed an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.

The applicant union sought certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.

As no statement of desire to make representations was filed, the Board dismissed the application and directed attention to section 10(3) of the Act regarding future applications.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party hotel.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statement of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the bargaining unit appropriate.

The Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant union.

The applicant, Service Employees International Union, Local 528, sought to withdraw its application against Flamboro Downs Holdings Limited.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union applied for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application for certification and noted the potential application of the one-year bar under section 10(3) of the Act for any subsequent applications.

The applicant filed an application alleging a breach of the duty of fair representation under section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The responding party union and the employer reported that they had not been served with the application.

The Board observed that the application filed was incomplete, missing two pages.

The Board directed the applicant to deliver and file a complete application within 14 days, failing which the application would be deemed terminated.

The applicant filed an application alleging a violation of section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board directed the applicant to provide a detailed statement of material facts, documents, and remedies sought, warning that failure to comply could result in dismissal.

The applicant failed to reply.

The Board dismissed the application for lacking detail and failing to comply with Rule 26 of the Board's Rules of Procedure.

The applicant sought to withdraw her application against the responding party.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union filed an application for certification.

Following a representation vote where not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and no statement of desire to make representations was filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.

The Board noted the potential application of the one-year bar under section 10(3) of the Act for any subsequent applications.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of Cornerstone/Le Pilier supportive housing in Ottawa.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The employer and the trade union made a joint application for the Board's consent to the early termination of their collective agreement.

Notices were posted on the employer's premises, and no objections were filed by any affected employees.

The Board granted its consent to the early termination of the collective agreement based on the materials before it.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote in which more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon unit of employees.

The applicant filed an application under section 100 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board determined that the application pertained to the same circumstances as two other applications and ordered that they be heard together.

The Board scheduled the hearing and set a deadline for the responding party's response.

The applicant union applied for certification.

A representation vote resulted in a tie with one segregated ballot.

The parties agreed the individual who cast the segregated ballot was entitled to vote.

Because representation votes are by secret ballot, the Board directed that a second representation vote be held.