The applicant sought judicial review of a coroner's decision denying him standing at an ongoing inquest.
The coroner found the applicant did not meet the statutory requirements for standing under either the public law or private law tests.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, holding that the coroner's decision was entitled to curial deference and was not unreasonable.
The court emphasized the need to avoid interrupting the ongoing statutory hearing and found no serious error in principle that would justify interference.
