The appellant sought an extension of time to seek leave to appeal a Divisional Court decision that dismissed her appeal of a Law Society Tribunal decision.
The appellant also sought to set aside the Divisional Court's decision based on an apprehension of bias, arguing that the lack of hearing transcripts hindered her ability to prove bias.
The Court of Appeal applied the four-factor test for extensions of time, finding that while the appellant intended to appeal and there was no prejudice to the respondent, the delay was significant and the bias allegations lacked particulars and cogent evidence.
The court concluded that the proposed appeal lacked merit and dismissed the motion for an extension of time with costs.
