The applicant landlord and respondent tenant brought cross-applications regarding the interpretation of a commercial lease.
The landlord sought a declaration that the lease expired in 2029, while the tenant argued it expired in 2039.
The tenant also sought orders requiring the landlord to replace the roof and parking lot, and an injunction regarding access to a parcel of land.
The court found the lease documents were ambiguous and admitted extrinsic evidence, concluding the lease expires in 2039.
The court dismissed the tenant's counter-application, finding the landlord was not obligated to replace the roof or parking lot, and an injunction was premature.