2 total
A comprehensive general liability insurer underwriting Ontario risks connects itself to Ontario for jurisdictional purposes.
This appeal addresses issues of jurisdiction simpliciter and forum non conveniens in a complex international insurance coverage dispute.
Vale and RSA initiated actions in Ontario seeking coverage for environmental liabilities, primarily in Ontario, after Travelers commenced a similar action in New York.
The motion judge largely found Ontario had jurisdiction and was not forum non conveniens, except for North River.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the insurers' appeals, affirming Ontario's jurisdiction over them, and allowed Vale's appeal, finding Ontario also had jurisdiction over North River.
The court emphasized that a comprehensive general liability insurer underwriting Ontario risks connects itself to Ontario for jurisdictional purposes, and that the "first-to-file" rule does not automatically determine the appropriate forum.
Summary judgment on ultimate limitation period denied due to genuine issue of fraudulent concealment.
The defendants brought a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the plaintiffs' action regarding a collapsed hog barn, arguing it was barred by the 15-year ultimate limitation period under the Limitations Act, 2002.
The plaintiffs argued the limitation period was tolled due to the defendants' wilful concealment of construction deficiencies.
The court found a genuine issue requiring a trial regarding the fraudulent concealment exception for the corporate defendants and dismissed their motion.
However, the court granted summary judgment dismissing the action against the individual engineer defendants, finding they were protected by a limitation of liability clause in their employer's contract.
